网络分析在数字人文中的应用框架

doi:10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2022.20.006

图书情报工作 ›› 2022, Vol. 66 ›› Issue (20): 50-61.DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2022.20.006

• 北京大学信息管理系成立75周年学术专辑 • 上一篇下一篇

网络分析在数字人文中的应用框架

王林旭^1,2, 王军^1,2

1. 北京大学信息管理系北京 100871;
2. 北京大学数字人文研究中心北京 100871

收稿日期:2022-07-29 修回日期:2022-09-05 出版日期:2022-10-20 发布日期:2022-11-17
通讯作者: 王军,教授,通信作者,E-mail:junwang@pku.edu.cn
作者简介:王林旭,博士研究生。
基金资助:
本文系国家自然科学基金国际重点合作项目"中国儒家学术史知识图谱构建研究"(项目编号:72010107003)研究成果之一。

Application Framework of Network Analysis in Digital Humanities

Wang Linxu^1,2, Wang Jun^1,2

1.Department of Information Management, Peking University, Beijing 100871;
2. The Center for Digital Humanities, Peking University, Beijing 100871

Received:2022-07-29 Revised:2022-09-05 Online:2022-10-20 Published:2022-11-17

摘要/Abstract

摘要： [目的/意义] 网络分析作为有效的分析手段与可视化方式,是数字人文领域应用最广泛的方向之一。对网络分析在数字人文领域的应用进行系统总结与归纳,有助于数字人文研究人员快速明确网络分析的能力与局限,以便开展更深层次的研究实践。[方法/过程] 采用内容分析法对发表在国际数字人文领域最有影响力的期刊和国际数字人文会议上近5年的文章进行梳理与总结,从研究问题、数据集、网络特性、网络分析指标4个方面进行梳理,最终提炼出网络分析方法在数字人文领域的应用框架。[结果/结论] 该应用框架包括三类数据规模(单一文本、平行文本和语料库)、五大应用场景(角色分析网络、人物关联网络、话语空间网络、文本关联网络、文化主题网络)、两种指标规模(全局指标和局部指标)以及五类指标类型(构成、密度、中心度、派系和结构)。

关键词: 网络分析, 数字人文, 社会网络分析, 内容分析

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] Network analysis is an effective analysis method and visualization method, is one of the most widely used directions in the field of digital humanities. A systematic summary and induction of the application of network analysis in the field of digital humanities will help the digital humanities researchers quickly identify the capabilities and limitations of network analysis, and to carry out deeper research practice. [Method/Process] In this study, we adopted content analysis to summary the papers published in the most influential journals in the international digital humanities field and International Digital Humanities Conference in the past five years. And from the five perspectives of research question, dataset, network special characteristics and network analysis metrics, the organization system for the application of network analysis methods in the field of digital humanities was finally extracted. [Result/Conclusion] The organizational structure includes three kinds of data scale (including single text analysis, parallel text analysis and corpus analysis), five application scenarios (containing characters analysis network, people relation network, words semantic network, text relevancy network and culture topic network), two scales of indicators (including global indicators and local indicators), and five types of metrics (like composition, density, centrality, clique and structure).

Key words: network analysis, digital humanities, social network analysis, content analysis

中图分类号:

G250

王林旭, 王军. 网络分析在数字人文中的应用框架[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(20): 50-61.

Wang Linxu, Wang Jun. Application Framework of Network Analysis in Digital Humanities[J]. Library and Information Service, 2022, 66(20): 50-61.

参考文献

[1] 赵薇.数字时代人文学研究的变革与超越——数字人文在中国[J].探索与争鸣,2021(6):191-206, 232-233.
[2] WETHERELL C. Historical social network analysis[J]. International review of social history, 1998, 43(S6): 125-144.
[3] 邵作运,李秀霞.引文分析法与内容分析法结合的文献知识发现方法综述[J].情报理论与实践,2020,43(3):153-159.
[4] RANDI R. Building a corpus: what are the key considerations?[M]//The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics. London :Routledge, 2010.
[5] PAINTER D T, DANIELS B C, JOST J. Network analysis for the digital humanities: principles, problems, extensions[J]. Isis, 2019, 110(3): 538-554.
[6] LUHMANN J, BURGHARDT M. Digital humanities-a discipline in its own right? an analysis of the role and position of digital humanities in the academic landscape[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2022, 73(2): 148-171.
[7] RHODES II M A. Paul Robeson’s place in YouTube: a social spatial network analysis of digital heritage[J]. Digital scholarship in the humanities, 2019, 34(1): 174-188.
[8] MORETTI F. Network theory, plot analysis[M]. London: Verso Books, 2013.
[9] EVALYN L, GAUCH S, SHUKLA M. Analyzing social networks of xml plays: exploring shakespeare’s genres[C/OL].[2022-08-22]. https://dh2018.adho.org/analyzing-social-networks-of-xml-plays-exploring-shakespeares-genres/.
[10] 赵薇.社会网络分析与"《大波》三部曲"的人物功能[J].山东社会科学,2018(9):50-64.
[11] SO R J, LONG H. Network analysis and the sociology of modernism[J]. Boundary 2, 2013, 40(2): 147-182.
[12] AGARWAL A, CORVALAN A, JENSEN J, et al. Social network analysis of alice in wonderland[C]// Proceedings of the NAACL-HLT 2012 Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Literature. Montréal: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2012: 88-96.
[13] MAC CARRON P, KENNA R. Universal properties of mythological networks[J]. Europhysics letters, 2012, 99(2): 28002.
[14] ALEXANDER M C, DANOWSKI J A. Analysis of an ancient network: personal communication and the study of social structure in a past society[J]. Social networks, 1990, 12(4): 313-335.
[15] LEMERCIER C, ZALC C. Quantitative methods in the humanities: an introduction[M]//GOLDHAMMER A. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2019.
[16] AHNERT R, AHNERT S E. Metadata, surveillance and the Tudor State[J]. History workshop journal, 2019, 87: 27-51.
[17] JACKSON C. Using social network analysis to reveal unseen relationships in medieval Scotland[J]. Digital scholarship in the humanities, 2017, 32(2): 336-343.
[18] 严承希,王军.数字人文视角:基于符号分析法的宋代政治网络可视化研究[J].中国图书馆学报,2018,44(5):87-103.
[19] 张力元,王军.基于社会网络动力学的两宋学术和政治体系比较分析[J].情报工程,2020,6(1):34-49.
[20] OCHAB J K, ŠKVRÁK J, ŠKVRÁK M. Detecting Ottokar II’s 1248-1249 uprising and its instigators in co-witnessing networks[J/OL]. Historical methods: a journal of quantitative and interdisciplinary history, 2022: 1-20[2022-08-22]. https://doi.org/10.1080/01615440.2022.2065397.
[21] 邱伟云.词汇、概念、话语:数字人文视野下中国近代"美"之观念的建构与再现[J].艺术理论与艺术史学刊,2019(1):182-223.
[22] CHAO A S, LIU Z, LI Q. Network of words: a co-occurrence analysis of nation-building terms in the writings of liang qichao and chen duxiu[J/OL]. Journal of historical network research, 2022, 5(1) [2022-08-22]. https://doi.org/10.25517/jhnr.v5i1.122.
[23] YANG Y, SONG Y. Exploring the similarity between Han’s and non-Han’s Yuan poetry: resistance distance metrics over character co-occurrence networks [J]. Digital scholarship in the humanities, 2022, 37(3): 880-893.
[24] LEVINE M. Biography for historical analysis: a chinese biographical database[J/OL]. Journal of historical network research, 2021, 5(1) [2022-08-22].http://jhnr.uni.lu/index.php/jhnr/article/view/124.
[25] BOL P K. From kinship to collegiality: changing literati networks, 1100-1400[J/OL]. Journal of historical network research, 2021, 5(1) [2022-08-22]. http://jhnr.uni.lu/index.php/jhnr/article/view/121.
[26] WAXMAN J. A graph database of scholastic relationships in the Babylonian Talmud[J]. Digital scholarship in the humanities, 2021, 36(S2): ii277-ii289.
[27] ROSA ZAMBRANO M, GONZALEZ M, MEDINA A, et al. Modern architecture in the professional discourse: analysis of the Architectural Biennial of Quito’s 1976-92 archive using bipartite networks [J]. Digital scholarship in the humanities, 2022, 37(3): 894-909.
[28] PIKKANEN I. The metrics and poetics of historical drama: the dramatis personae of a premodern revolt in early nineteenth-century Finland[J]. Orbis litterarum, 2019, 74(5): 311-339.
[29] KUBIS M. Quantitative analysis of character networks in Polish 19th-and 20th-century novels[J]. Digital scholarship in the humanities, 2021, 36(S2): ii175-ii181.
[30] JAYANNAVAR P, AGARWAL A, JU M, et al. Validating literary theories using automatic social network extraction[C]//Proceedings of the fourth workshop on computational linguistics for literature. Denver: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2015.
[31] 许超. 《左传》的语言网络和社会网络研究[D].南京:南京师范大学,2014.
[32] LEE J S Y, YEUNG C Y. Extracting networks of people and places from literary texts[C]//Proceedings of the 26th Pacific Asia conference on language, information, and computation. Bali: Faculty of Computer Science, Universitas Indonesia, 2012.
[33] SANTA MARÍA M T, CALVO TELLO J, JIMÉNEZ C M. Existe correlación entre importancia y centralidad? evaluación de personajes con redes sociales en obras teatrales de la Edad de Plata[J]. Digital scholarship in the humanities, 2021, 36(S1): i81-i88.
[34] SHANG W, SANG Z. Solidity in a turbulent flow: the social network of aristocratic families in the Eastern Jin Dynasty (317-420 CE)[J/OL]. Journal of historical network research, 2022, 5(1) [2022-08-22]. http://jhnr.uni.lu/index.php/jhnr/article/view/126.
[35] ARMAND C, HENRIOT C. From textual to historical networks: Social relations in the bio-graphical dictionary of republican China[J/OL]. Journal of historical network research, 2021, 5(1) [2022-08-22]. http://jhnr.uni.lu/index.php/jhnr/article/view/117.
[36] HILL M J, SÄILY T. Patterns of early modern authorship: using metadata as historical record[C/OL] Utrecht: DH, 2019[2022-08-22]. https://researchportal.helsinki.fi/sv/activities/patterns-of-early-modern-authorship-using-metadata-as-historical-.
[37] 李惠,侯君明,陈涛,等.含珠与萤光:古代书信网络的衍化研究[J].数字人文,2020(1):109-117.
[38] YOO J J. Poetry in action: networks of literary communication and the cultural leverage in the eighteenth-century Seoul[J]. Digital scholarship in the humanities, 2021, 36(3): 766-781.
[39] XIONG H L. Path toward the top leadership: a network analysis of the civil service system in the early southern song (1131-1164)[J/OL]. Journal of historical network research, 2022, 5(1) [2022-08-22]. http://jhnr.uni.lu/index.php/jhnr/article/view/98.
[40] G RAYSON S, WADE K, MEANEY G, et al. The sense and sensibility of different sliding windows in constructing co-occurrence networks from literature[C]//International workshop on computational history and data-driven humanities. Cham: Springer, 2016: 65-77.
[41] GAMERMANN D, MORET-TATAY C, NAVARRO-PARDO E, et al. The small-world of 'Le Petit Prince’: revisiting the word frequency distribution[J]. Digital scholarship in the humanities, 2017, 32(2): 301-311.
[42] LEE C. How are 'immigrant workers’ represented in Korean news reporting?-a text mining approach to critical discourse analysis[J]. Digital scholarship in the humanities, 2019, 34(1): 82-99.
[43] 徐彤阳,王霞.语料库语言学视域下数据驱动的数字人文研究——以《数字人文季刊》为例[J].图书馆论坛,2021,41(10):90-99.
[44] MCENERY A, BAKER H. Corpus linguistics and 17th-century prostitution: computational linguistics and history [EB/OL] .[2022-09-01]. https://www.bloomsburycollections.com/book/corpus-linguistics-and-17th-century-prostitution-computational-linguistics-and-history.
[45] BONIN H. From antagonist to protagonist:'democracy’and 'people’in British parliamentary debates, 1775-1885[J]. Digital scholarship in the humanities, 2020, 35(4): 759-775.
[46] 邱伟云.论数字人文研究中可视化数据的意义与价值——以数字概念史研究为例[J].文艺理论与批评,2020,(2):23-29.
[47] LONGHI J. Mapping information and identifying disinformation based on digital humanities methods: from accuracy to plasticity[J]. Digital scholarship in the humanities, 2021, 36(4): 980-998.
[48] ROTARI G, JANDER M, RYBICKI J. The Grimm Brothers: a stylometric network analysis[J]. Digital scholarship in the humanities, 2021, 36(1): 172-186.
[49] LEE C. Do language combinations affect translators’ stylistic visibility in translated texts?[J]. Digital scholarship in the humanities, 2018, 33(3): 592-603.
[50] 刘军. 社会网络分析手册上[M]. 重庆:重庆大学出版社, 2018.
[51] GIAGNOLINI L, DAQUINO M, MAMBELLI F, et al. Exploratory methods for relation discovery in archival data[J/OL]. Digital scholarship in the humanities, 2022[2022-08-18]. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqac036.
[52] MILONIA S, MAZZAMURRO M. Temporal networks of 'Contrafacta’ in the first three troubadour generations[J/OL]. Digital scholarship in the humanities, 2022[2022-08-18]. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqac018.
[53] GRANDJEAN M, JACOMY M. Translating networks: assessing correspondence between network visualisation and analytics[C/OL]. Utrecht: DH, 2019[2022-08-18]. https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-02179024/.
[54] TANG M C, CHEN K. A cross-language comparison of co-word networks in digital library and museum of buddhist studies[C/OL]. Montreal: DH. 2017[2022-08-18]. http://buddhism.lib.ntu.edu.tw/FULLTEXT/JR-OTHERS/others575593.pdf.
[55] TRILCKE P, FISCHER F, GOBEL M, et al. Theatre plays as 'small worlds'? network data on the history and typology of german drama, 1730-1930[C/OL]. Jagiellonian University & Pedagogical University, Kraków: DH. 2016[2022-08-18]. https://publications.hse.ru/en/chapters/196225767.
[56] FREEMAN L C. Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification[J]. Social networks, 1978, 1(3): 215-239.
[57] PIPER A, ALGEE-HEWITT M, SINHA K, et al. Studying literary characters and character networks[C/OL].[2022-08-18]. https://dh2017.adho.org/abstracts/103/103.pdf.
[58] CAMACHO D, PANIZO-LLEDOT Á, BELLO-ORGAZ G, et al. The four dimensions of social network analysis: an overview of research methods, applications, and software tools[J]. Information fusion, 2020, 63: 88-120.
[59] PALLADIO. Visualize complex historical data with ease[EB/OL]. [2022-08-18]. http://hdlab.stanford.edu/palladio/.
[60] TU H C, HSIANG J, HUNG I M, et al. Docusky, a personal digital humanities platform for scholars[J]. Journal of Chinese history, 2020, 4(2): 564-580.
[61] MASÍAS V H, BALDWIN P, LAENGLE S, et al. Exploring the prominence of Romeo and Juliet’s characters using weighted centrality measures[J]. Digital scholarship in the humanities, 2017, 32(4): 837-858.
[62] FANG Y, LIU H. Seeing various adventures through a mirror: detecting translator’s stylistic visibility in Chinese translations of Alice's adventure in wonderland[J/OL]. Digital scholarship in the humanities, 2022[2022-08-18]. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqac024.
[63] LIM T Y, LEE S H, TAK J Y, et al. Revisiting sylvia Plath’s and Anne sexton’s confessional poetry: analyzing stylistic differences and evolution of poetic voice (s) through computational text analysis[J]. Digital scholarship in the humanities, 2021, 36(4): 950-970.
[64] ALGEE-HEWITT M A. The hidden dictionary: text mining eighteenth-century knowledge networks[C/OL]. Mexico City: DH. 2018[2022-08-18]. https://dh2018.adho.org/en/the-hidden-dictionary-text-mining-eighteenth-century-knowledge-networks/.
[65] ZHITOMIRSKY-GEFFET M, PREBOR G. Sagebook: toward a cross-generational social network for the Jewish sages’ prosopography[J]. Digital scholarship in the humanities, 2019, 34(3): 676-695.
[66] RUEGG C, LEE J J. Epic social networks and eve’s centrality in Milton’s paradise lost[J]. Digital scholarship in the humanities, 2020, 35(1): 146-159.
[67] KUBIS M, MICKIEWICZ A. Quantitative analysis of character networks in polish xix and xx century novels[C/OL]. Utrecht: DH, 2019[2022-08-18]. https://mkubis.home.amu.edu.pl/dh2019.pdf.
[68] LEE C. Do language combinations affect translators’ stylistic visibility in translated texts?[J]. Digital scholarship in the humanities, 2018, 33(3): 592-603.
[69] LI W. Visualizing networks of artistic ideas in history paintings in the seventeenth-century Netherlands[C/OL]. Utrecht: DH, 2019[2022-08-18]. https://dataverse.nl/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.34894/YVFEZO.
[70] HAIDER T, VAN DYCK-HEMMING A. Extracting a social network of musicologists[C]// Digital Humanities 2020 Book of Abstracts. Ottawa: DH, 2020:143.
[71] LA PARRA-PEREZ A, MUOZ F F, FERNANDEZ-DE-PINEDO N. Econhist: a relational database for analyzing the evolution of economic history (1980-2019)[J]. Historical methods: a journal of quantitative and interdisciplinary history, 2022, 55(1): 45-60.
[72] BROWN D M, SOTO-COROMINAS A, SUÁREZ J L. The preliminaries project: geography, networks, and publication in the Spanish golden age[J]. Digital scholarship in the humanities, 2017, 32(4): 709-732.
[73] LEDOLTER J, VANDERVELDE L. A case study in text mining: textual analysis of the territorial papers[J]. Digital scholarship in the humanities, 2020, 35(1): 101-126.
[74] LEVINE M. Post WWI Chinese revolutionary leaders in Europe[J/OL]. Journal of historical network research, 2021, 5(1) [2022-08-18]. http://jhnr.uni.lu/index.php/jhnr/article/view/125.
[75] 阳雨,郭勇,李海龙,等.异质网络社区发现研究进展[J].计算机应用研究,2018,35(10):2881-2887.

网络分析在数字人文中的应用框架

Application Framework of Network Analysis in Digital Humanities

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	刘明信, 李丹丹, 李荣, 江洪波, 毛开云. 专利视阈下产业技术创新合作网络演化分析——以肿瘤疫苗为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(9): 117-127.
[2]	宋雪雁, 霍晓楠, 刘寅鹏, 邓君. 数字人文视角下《全唐诗》贬谪诗人的时空轨迹分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(7): 26-34.
[3]	苏辀恒, 张敏, 王锦. 图书情报领域情感研究现状述评[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(6): 137-147.
[4]	吉海颖, 戚桂杰, 李娜. 开放式创新平台用户交互对隐性社区的影响研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(5): 105-115.
[5]	马铭, 王超, 许海云, 龚兵营, 周勇. 面向语义信息分析的多层次技术演化轨迹识别方法研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(4): 103-117.
[6]	侯西龙, 王晓光, 段青玉. 数字人文视域下文化遗产图像远读可视化调查与分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(3): 54-64.
[7]	张久珍, 崔汭. 基于引文内容分析法的刘国钧《近代图书馆之性质及功用》影响研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(20): 93-100.
[8]	鞠孜涵, 白如江, 张玉洁, 王志民. 数字人文视域下古籍数据库建设关键技术研究——兼评稷下学文献资料数据库的建设思路[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(19): 4-14.
[9]	张玉洁, 白如江, 张亚辉, 冯梦莹, 鞠孜涵, 邢莹. 追溯现代精神文明的古典参照:基于稷下学数字人文研究视角[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(19): 15-25.
[10]	冯梦莹, 白如江, 张玉洁, 王效岳, 耿振东, 王志民. 面向数字人文的稷下思想自动分类研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(19): 26-35.
[11]	戴艳清, 胡逸夫. 公共数字文化服务可及性要素研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(16): 57-68.
[12]	欧石燕, 凌洪飞. 引用文本自动分类及其应用研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(16): 125-136.
[13]	付雅明, 张永娟, 刘炜, 朱庆华. 数字叙事作为数字人文方法:现状与可能[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(14): 10-19.
[14]	司莉, 郭财强. 基于内容分析的数字人文领域中知识组织价值体现研究综述[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(13): 127-137.
[15]	杨宁, 张志强. 结合计量分析和内容分析的科学数据集使用特征研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(10): 122-130.