[1] MCGANN J G. 2020 global go to think tank index report[R]. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, 2021. [2] GARY B. Evidence-based policy making: what is it? how do we get it?[M]// World Scientific reference on Asia-Pacific trade policies. Singapore: World Scientific, 2020: 719-736. [3] 聚智聚力,推动中国特色新型智库高质量发展[EB/OL]. [2022-05-26]. https://news.gmw.cn/2022-05/26/content_35764138.htm. [4] 宋忠惠,郑军卫. 图书情报类期刊中的智库相关研究评价与分析[J]. 情报杂志,2016,35(8):145-150. [5] 申静,蔡文君,毕煜. 智库研究的现状、热点与前沿[J].情报理论与实践,2020,43(12):30-38. [6] 王世伟. 试析情报工作在智库中的前端作用——以上海社会科学院信息研究所为例[J]. 情报资料工作,2011,32 (2):92-96. [7] HONG W. Exploring the coping strategies of university library and information organizations in the construction of national think tanks[C]//International conference on arts, management, education and innovation. Ottawa: Clausius Scientific Press,2019:18-23. [8] 智库:国家的不可或缺的"外脑"[EB/OL]. [2022-06-10]. https://www.sinoss.net/2014/0508/50049.html. [9] 郭华桥. 研究型大学智库建设模式与困境突围——基于"学者"使命的视角[J]. 中国高教研究,2014,30 (5):50-57. [10] BRATERSKY A. Think tanks during Donald Trump’s presidency[J]. USA & Canada: economics, politics, culture,2020,50(6):92-108. [11] 毛丹.多元协同视角下图书馆学会参与社会智库服务策略研究[J]. 河南图书馆学刊,2021,41(7):95-96,99. [12] 仇笳熙,张静一. 科学基金项目的成果跟踪与管理初探[J]. 科研管理,2017,38(S1):695-699. [13] 教育部印发《关于破除高校哲学社会科学研究评价中"唯论文"不良导向的若干意见》的通知[EB/OL]. [2022-06-15]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A13/moe_2557/s3103/202012/t20201215_505588.html. [14] 曾文. 数字时代人文社会科学的正确评价导向——以数字学术成果的评价问题为中心[J].图书馆论坛,2021,41(2):46-55. [15] 姚乐野,王阿陶. 我国高校人文社会科学学术成果的国际影响力分析——基于"985"高校在Web of Science期刊发文引文的研究[J]. 四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2015,61(1):111-120. [16] 严炜炜,温馨,曹灿瑜. 学术社交网络中iSchool高影响力科研成果特征分析[J]. 情报科学,2021,39(7):23-29,37. [17] 张琳,杜会英,尚媛媛,等. 性别视角下国家自然科学基金项目负责人的成果产出与影响研究[J]. 信息资源管理学报,2021,11(3):110-120. [18] ZHANG M, ZHANG G, LIU Y, et al. Scientists’ genders and international academic collaboration: an empirical study of Chinese universities and research institutes[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2020, 14(4): 101068. [19] TRUONG H T, LE H M, DO D A, et al. Impact of governance factors over lecturers’ scientific research output: an empirical evidence[J]. Education sciences, 2021, 11(9): 553. [20] LERNER J Y. Getting the message across: evaluating think tank influence in Congress[J]. Public choice, 2018, 175(3): 347-366. [21] CHRISTENSEN J, HOLST C. How do advocacy think tanks relate to academic knowledge? the case of Norway[J]. Scandinavian political studies, 2020, 43(3): 223-239. [22] WEAVER R K. The changing world of think tanks[J]. PS: political science & politics, 1989, 22(3): 563-578. [23] PLANELLS-ARTIGOT E, ORTIGOSA-BLANCh A, MARTÍ-SÁNCHEZ M. Bridging fields: a comparative study of the presence of think tanks[J]. Technological forecasting and social change, 2021, 162: 120377. [24] 黄胜杰,张毅. 我国产学研合作的组织模式及其网络特性探析[J]. 高等工程教育研究,2002,20(6):30-33. [25] VAN LOOY B, RANGA M, CALLAERT J, et al. Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia: towards a compounded and reciprocal Matthew-Effect[J]. Research policy, 2004, 33(3): 425-441. [26] BUENSTORF G. Is commercialization good or bad for science? individual-level evidence from the max planck society[J]. Research policy, 2009, 38(2): 281-292. [27] 聂峰英,孙明杰,张海燕,等. 国际比较视域下科技智库多主体运营模式研究[J]. 情报理论与实践,2020,43(10):74-80. [28] 宋鹭,安怡宁. 世界顶级智库如何开展和保障高质量研究——以彼得森国际经济研究所为例[J]. 智库理论与实践,2021,6(1):77-83. [29] 高浩然. 社会科学领域的学术研究与智库活动——以美国经济学界为例[D]. 北京:北京大学, 2020. [30] FEDDERKE J W, GOLDSCHMIDT M. Does massive funding support of researchers work? evaluating the impact of the South African research chair funding initiative[J]. Research policy, 2015, 44(2): 467-482. [31] 马缨. 行政职务对我国科研人员论文发表的影响[J]. 科学学研究,2017,35(11):1614-1622. [32] MCGANN J G. Global trends and transitions in think tanks, politics, and policy advice in the age of policy dilemmas and disruptions[M]//Consensus or conflict? Singapore: Springer, 2021: 179-190. [33] PAUTZ H. Revisiting the think-tank phenomenon[J]. Public policy and administration, 2011, 26(4): 419-435. [34] 周湘智. 主管部门介入生产:智库成果质量控制的有效模式[J]. 智库理论与实践,2021,6(5):8-13. [35] MENDIZABAL E. From perception to objectivity: how think tanks’ search for credibility may lead to a more rigorous assessment of research quality[C]//ERIKA K M, ROBERT T, MATTHEW L, et.al. Transforming research excellence. Cape Town: African minds, 2020:178-199. [36] 王洪才,毛芳才. 我国高校学术委员会的生成逻辑与优化路径[J]. 厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2021,96 (1):122-130. [37] JIA R, NIE H, XIAO W. Power and publications in Chinese academia[J]. Journal of comparative economics, 2019, 47(4): 792-805. [38] MCCRAIN J. Revolving door lobbyists and the value of congressional staff connections[J]. The journal of politics, 2018,80(4):1369-1383. [39] CAMPOS R, LEON F, MCQUILLIN B. Lost in the storm: the academic collaborations that went missing in murricane ISSAC[J]. The economic journal, 2018, 128(610):995-1018. [40] 王战平,朱宸良,汪玲,等.生态系统视角下虚拟学术社区科研人员合作影响因素研究[J].情报理论与实践,2021,44(4):119-129,98. [41] 郑荣,唐伟航,杨竞雄,等. 多元主体协同视角下的智库影响力提升机制研究[J]. 情报科学,2020,38(9):63-68. [42] ZHAO D, STROTMANN A. Information science during the first decade of the Web: an enriched author co-citation analysis[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2008, 59(6): 916-937. [43] 邱均平,周春雷. 发文量和h指数结合的高影响力作者评选方法研究——以图书情报学为例的实证分析[J]. 图书馆论坛,2008,28(6):44-49. [44] BOJKO M M, KNAPIŃSKA A, TOMCZYŃSKA A. Academic entrepreneurship and the research productivity in Poland[J]. Industry and innovation, 2021, 28(4): 486-506. [45] UNESCO. Science, technology and gender: an international report[R]. Paris: Unesco Publishing, 2007. [46] 张晓娜. 基于中文核心期刊的图书情报学科学者的学术年龄研究[J]. 情报探索,2019,33(1):62-66. [47] ANDREA B, PAOLA B, LUCA S. The research productivity of universities. a multilevel and multidisciplinary analysis on European institutions[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2021,15(2):101129. [48] LARIVIÈRE V, NI C, GINGRAS Y, et al. Bibliometrics: global gender disparities in science[J]. Nature, 2013, 504(7479): 211-213. [49] CARD D, ASHENFELTER O. Using the longitudinal structure of earnings to estimate the effect of training programs[J]. Review of economics and statistics, 1985, 67(4): 648-660. [50] BECK T, LEVINE R, LEVKOV A. Big bad banks? the winners and losers from bank deregulation in the United States[J]. The journal of finance, 2010, 65(5): 1637-1667. [51] World Health Organization?.World health day 2012: ageing and health: toolkit for event organizers[R/OL]. [2022-07-01]. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/70840. [52] PETERSEN A M. Quantifying the impact of weak, strong, and super ties in scientific careers[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2015, 112(34): E4671-E4680. [53] 秦佳良,贺明华. 学者开放性和学术影响力[J]. 科学学研究,2020,38(5):769-778,796. [54] NAVEED A, SULERI A. Making ’impact factor’ impactful: universities, think tanks and policy research in Pakistan[R]. Islamabad: Sustainable Development Policy Institute, 2022. |