[1] JIA T, WANG D, SZYMANSKI B K. Quantifying patterns of research-interest evolution[J]. Nature human behaviour, 2017, 1(4): 0078. [2] ZENG A, SHEN Z, ZHOU J, et al. Increasing trend of scientists to switch between topics[J]. Nature communications, 2019, 10(1): 1-11. [3] 霍朝光, 张斌, 董克. 复杂网络视域下的学术行为预测研究述评: 选题, 合作与引用[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2021, 44(6): 180-188. [4] TOUBIA O, BERGER J, ELIASHBERG J, et al. How quantifying the shape of stories predicts their success[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021, 118(26): e2011695118. [5] JEONG Y K, SONG M, DING Y. Content-based author co-citation analysis[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2014, 8(1): 197-211. [6] ZHOU J, FAN Y. Quantifying the research diversification of physicists[J]. Journal of systems science and systems engineering, 2021, 30(6): 1-16. [7] SINATRA R, DEVILE P, SZELL M, et al. A century of physics[J]. Nature physics, 2015, 11(10): 791-796. [8] ZHANG C, BU Y, DING Y, et al. Understanding scientific collaboration: homophily, transitivity, and preferential attachment[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2018, 69(1): 72-86. [9] LIU M, BU Y, CHEN C, et al. Pandemics are catalysts of scientific novelty: evidence from COVID-19 [J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2022, 73(8):1065-1078. [10] DEVLIN J, CHANG MW, LEE K, et al. Bert: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805, 2018. [11] SINHA A, SHEN Z, SONG Y, et al. An overview of Microsoft academic service (mas) and applications[C]// Proceedings of the 24th international conference on World Wide Web. Florence: ACM, 2015: 243-246. [12] WANG K, SHEN Z, HUANG C Y, et al. Microsoft academic graph: when experts are not enough[J]. Quantitative science studies, 2020, 1(1): 396-413. [13] ALSHEBLI B K, RAHWAN T, WOON W L. The preeminence of ethnic diversity in scientific collaboration[J]. Nature communications, 2018, 9(1): 1-10. [14] BU Y, LI M, GU W, et al. Topic diversity: a discipline scheme-free diversity measurement for journals[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2021, 72(5): 523-539. [15] GUPTA B, KARISIDDIPPA C. Collaboration and author productivity: a study with a new variable in Lotka’s law[J]. Scientometrics, 1999, 44(1): 129-134. [16] LEYDESDORFF L. How are new citation-based journal indicators adding to the bibliometric toolbox?[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2009, 60(7): 1327-1336. [17] LEVITT J M, THELWALL M. Is multidisciplinary research more highly cited? a macrolevel study[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2008, 59(12): 1973-1984. [18] LIU L, DEHMAMY N, CHOWN J, et al. Understanding the onset of hot streaks across artistic, cultural, and scientific careers[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.01256, 2021. [19] LEYDESDORFF L, RAFOLS I, MILOJEVIC S. Bridging the divide between qualitative and quantitative science studies[J]. Quantitative science studies, 2020, 1(3): 918-926. [20] 付伟棠. 我国学术期刊同行评议研究综述[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2019, 30(8): 819-826. [21] 步一, 许家伟, 黄文彬. 基于引文的科学文献定量评价:引文影响力指标评述[J]. 图书情报知识, 2021, 38(6): 47-59. [22] WALTMAN L. A review of the literature on citation impact indicators[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2016, 10(2): 365-391. [23] DING Y. Applying weighted PageRank to author citation networks[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2011, 62(2): 236-245. [24] 赵丹群. 文献计量范式下的科学知识图谱研究: 新进展与新挑战[J]. 情报学进展, 2020, 13: 354-380. [25] 张琳, 刘冬东, 吕琦, 等. 论文学科交叉测度研究: 从全部引文到章节引文[J]. 情报学报, 2020, 39(5): 492-499. |