图书情报工作 ›› 2023, Vol. 67 ›› Issue (3): 96-105.DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2023.03.009

• 情报研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

绝对颠覆性指数与同行评议指标及CNCI的关系:基于病毒学论文的研究

姜育彦1, 刘雪立1,2   

  1. 1 新乡医学院河南省科技期刊研究中心 新乡 453003;
    2 新乡医学院期刊社 新乡 453003
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-05 修回日期:2022-11-02 出版日期:2023-02-24 发布日期:2023-02-24
  • 通讯作者: 刘雪立,社长,教授,编审,硕士生导师,通信作者, E-mail:liueditor@163.com
  • 作者简介:姜育彦,硕士研究生。
  • 基金资助:
    本文系国家社会科学基金项目“引证指标的学科标准化方法与跨学科学术评价研究” (项目编号: 19BTQ087)研究成果之一。

The Relationship Between Absolute Disruption Index, Peer Review Index and CNCI: A Study Based on Virology Papers

Jiang Yuyan1, Liu Xueli1,2   

  1. 1 Henan Research Center for Science Journals, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang 453003;
    2 Periodicals Publishing House, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang 453003
  • Received:2022-08-05 Revised:2022-11-02 Online:2023-02-24 Published:2023-02-24

摘要: [目的/意义] 探索绝对颠覆性指数 DZ 与 Faculty Opinions 同行评议指标和引证指标 CNCI 间的相关性,揭示Faculty Opinions 同行评议指标在研究论文颠覆性创新早期识别中的效果。[方法/过程] 通过对选出的 140 篇研究论文的绝对颠覆性指数DZ、 Faculty Opinions 同行评议指标 [包括同行评分(FScore)、同行评级(FStar)、评价次数(FTime)、加权评级(FStar_w)、加权评价次数(FTime_w)] 和影响力指标 CNCI 进行相关性分析,并对高颠覆性文献、 Faculty Opinions 收录文献、高影响力文献在全部 5 566 篇焦点文献中的分布和不同评价角度下选出的研究文献重合情况进行研究。[结果/结论] 从全部病毒学领域期刊来看,绝对颠覆性指数DZ与 Faculty Opinions 同行评议指标间存在弱相关性,与影响力指标 CNCI 间存在中等相关性。FScore 与 CNCI 存在着强相关性, FStar、 FStar_w 与 CNCI 存在着中等相关性, FTime、 FTime_w 与 CNCI 存在着弱相关性。但不同标签的研究论文三类指标间的相关性各不相同。其中,变革性研究论文的同行评议结果与绝对颠覆性指数的一致性与加权评分均高于循证性研究论文。三种评价指标在实际评价过程中应互为补充而非相互替代。在识别早期颠覆性创新的过程中, Faculty Opinions 同行评议指标可以发挥一定的作用,其同时也可以辅助研究人员在发表后快速发现有潜在影响力的研究论文。

关键词: 绝对颠覆性指数, 创新性评价, 同行评议指标, 引证指标, 潜在影响力

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] This paper explores the correlation between absolute disruption index (DZ), peer-review index of Faculty Opinions and citation index CNCI and reveals the effect of Faculty Opinions peer review index in early identification of disruption innovation in research papers.[Method/Process] Through the correlation analysis of the selected 140 research papers' DZ, Faculty Opinions peer review indicators[including peer rating (FScore), peer rating (FStar), evaluation times (FTime), weighted rating (FStar_w), weighted evaluation times (FTime_w)], and the impact index CNCI, furthermore, the distribution of high-disruptive literature, literature collected by Faculty Opinions and high-impact literature in all 5 566 focus literatures and the coincidence of research literatures selected from different evaluation angles were studied.[Result/Conclusion] Across the all virology journals, there is a weak correlation between DZ and the peer review index of Faculty Opinions and a moderate correlation between DZ and CNCI. There is a strong correlation between FScore and CNCI, a moderate correlation between FStar and FStar_w and CNCI, and a weak correlation between FTime and FTime_w. But there are different correlations among the three indexes of research papers with different labels. Among them, the consistency and FStar_w between peer review results of transformative research papers and absolute disruption index are higher than that of evidence-based research papers. Among them, the peer review results of transformative research papers are more consistent with absolute subversive index than evidence-based research papers, and average FStar_w of transformative research papers are higher than those of evidence-based research papers. In the actual evaluation effect, the three evaluation indexes should complement each other rather than replace each other. In the process of identifying early disruptive innovations, the peer review index of the Faculty Opinions can play a certain role and it can also assist researchers to quickly find potentially influential research papers after publication at the same time.

Key words: disruption index, innovative evaluation, peer review indicators, citation index, potential influence