基于fsQCA的公共阅读空间有效运行路径分析——以共同生产理论为研究视角

doi:10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2023.04.002

图书情报工作 ›› 2023, Vol. 67 ›› Issue (4): 11-20.DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2023.04.002

基于fsQCA的公共阅读空间有效运行路径分析——以共同生产理论为研究视角

范蕴玉¹, 张宇²

1 苏州大学政治与公共管理学院苏州 215000;
2 扬州大学政府治理与公共政策研究中心扬州 225000

收稿日期:2022-07-01 修回日期:2022-09-30 出版日期:2023-02-20 发布日期:2023-03-04
通讯作者: 张宇,教授,博士,博士生导师,通信作者,E-mail:glzhangyu@yzu.edu.cn
作者简介:范蕴玉,博士研究生。
基金资助:
本文系国家社会科学基金重点项目“公民数字化政策参与平等性的实现路径研究”（项目编号：22AZZ008）和江苏省研究生科研与实践创新计划项目“突发公共事件背景下城市社区公共文化服务效能提升研究”（项目编号：KYCX21_2899）研究成果之一。

Analysis of the Effective Operation Path of Public Reading Space Based on fsQCA: Taking Co-Production Theory as a Research Perspective

Fan Yunyu¹, Zhang Yu²

1 School of Politics and Public Administration, Soochow University, Suzhou 215000;
2 Research Center for Government Governance and Public Policy, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225000

Received:2022-07-01 Revised:2022-09-30 Online:2023-02-20 Published:2023-03-04

摘要/Abstract

摘要： [目的/意义] 分析多重因素影响公共阅读空间运行效益的复杂因果机制，为提升公共阅读空间运行效益，优化公共服务供给提供参考。[方法/过程] 根据共同生产理论构建影响公共阅读空间运行效益的分析框架，以我国31个公共阅读空间为例，运用fsQCA软件获取公共阅读空间有效运行的条件组合路径。[结果/结论] 分析结果显示，公共阅读空间有效运行是多条件协同作用的结果，存在5条组合路径，且能被进一步归纳为公共阅读空间有效运行的3种驱动模式，即常规生产者主导下宣传驱动模式、常规生产者主导下资源驱动模式和常规生产者与消费生产者合作供给模式。

关键词: 共同生产理论, 公共阅读空间, 模糊集定性比较分析

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] Analyzing the complex causal mechanism of multiple factors affecting the operational efficiency of public reading space can provide reference for improving the operational efficiency of public reading space and optimizing public service supply.[Method/Process] Based on the theory of co-production, an analysis framework was constructed to influence the operational efficiency of public reading space. Taking 31 cases of public reading space in China as examples, fsQCA software was used to obtain the combination path of conditions for efficient operation of public reading space.[Result/Conclusion] The analysis results show that the efficient operation of public reading space is the result of synergy of multiple conditions, and there are five combined paths which can be further categorized into three modes for efficient operation of public reading space:the publicity-driven mode led by regular producers, the resource-driven mode led by regular producers and the cooperative supply mode of regular producers and consumer producers.

Key words: co-production theory, public reading space, fuzzy set qualitative comparatitive analysis

中图分类号:

G258

范蕴玉, 张宇. 基于fsQCA的公共阅读空间有效运行路径分析——以共同生产理论为研究视角[J]. 图书情报工作, 2023, 67(4): 11-20.

Fan Yunyu, Zhang Yu. Analysis of the Effective Operation Path of Public Reading Space Based on fsQCA: Taking Co-Production Theory as a Research Perspective[J]. Library and Information Service, 2023, 67(4): 11-20.

参考文献

[1] 习近平:要提倡多读书, 建设书香社会[EB/OL].[2022-06-23].http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/2019-08/22/c_1124906453.htm.
[2] 程训敏, 谢雨.城市公共阅读空间建设探析——以合肥市为例[J].图书馆理论与实践, 2019(2):95-99.
[3] 王子舟.我国公共阅读空间的兴起与发展[J].图书情报知识, 2017(2):4-12.
[4] 顾晓华, 陈奎莲.打造高质量的专业阅读空间, 助力全面建成小康社会[J].科技与出版, 2020(7):14-21.
[5] 李建霞, 文卫华.我国公共阅读空间的兴起与发展趋势探析[J].出版广角, 2019(8):19-21.
[6] 文琴.国内外城市公共阅读空间研究综述[J/OL].图书馆建设[2022-06-18].https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/23.1331.G2.20220216.1240.002.html.
[7] 中国新闻出版研究院发布第十九次全国国民阅读调查结果[EB/OL].[2022-06-18].https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1730886291701266733&wfr=spider&for=pc.
[8] 张云翔.居家养老服务中的共同生产研究——以上海花木社区乐巢项目为例[J].浙江学刊, 2016(1):135-140.
[9] 吴金鹏.公共服务共同生产的过程机制与创新策略——以公共图书馆服务为例[J].图书馆论坛, 2020, 42(9):92-100.
[10] OSTROM E.Crossing the great divide:coproduction, synergy, and development[J].World development, 1996, 24(6):1073-1087.
[11] PESTOFF V.Co-production, new public governance and third sector social services in Europe[J].Ciências sociais unisinos, 2011, 47(1):15-24.
[12] 张云翔.公共服务的共同生产:文献综述及其启示[J].甘肃行政学院学报, 2018(5):31-45, 126.
[13] OSBORNE S P, RADNOR Z, STROKOSCH K.Coproduction and the cocreation of value in public services:a suitable case for treatment[J].Public management review, 2016, 18(5):639-653.
[14] PARKS R B, BAKER P C, KISER L, et al.Consumers as coproducers of public services:some economic and institutional considerations[J].Policy studies journal, 1981, 9(7):1001-1011.
[15] OSBORNE S P.The new public governance[J].Public management review, 2006, 8(3):377-387.
[16] ALFORD J.Coproduction, interdependence and publicness:extending public service-dominant logic[J].Public management review, 2015, 18(5):673-691.
[17] OSBORNE S P, RADNOR Z, NASI G C.A new theory of public service management:towards a (public) service-dominant approach[J].American review of public administration, 2013, 943(2):135-158.
[18] SHARP E.Toward a new understanding of urban services and citizen participation:the coproduction concept[J].American review of public administration, 1980, 14(2):105-118.
[19] LUSCH R F, VARGO S L.Service-dominant logic:reactions, reflections and refinements[J].Marketing theory, 2006, 6(3):281.
[20] ETGAR M.A descriptive model of the consumer coproduction process[J].Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2008, 36(1):97-108.
[21] BRUDNEY J, ENGLAND R E.Toward a definition of the coproduction concept[J].Public administration review, 1983, 43(1):59-65.
[22] TANG L.An integral model of collective action in organizations and beyond[J].Journal of business ethics, 2008, 80(2):249-261.
[23] 颜玉凡.公共文化服务参与主体的行为特征及优化发展[J].中州学刊, 2019(1):81-86.
[24] OSBORNE S P, STROKOSCH K.It takes two to tango? understanding the coproduction of public services by integrating the services management and public administration perspectives[J].British journal of management, 2013, 24(S1):31-47.
[25] RICH R C.Interaction of the voluntary and governmental sectors toward an understanding of the coproduction of municipal services[J].Administration & society, 1981, 13(1):59-76.
[26] LINDERS D.From e-government to we-government:defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media[J].Government information quarterly, 2012, 29(4):446-454.
[27] JAKOBSEN M.Can government initiatives increase citizen coproduction? results of a randomized field experiment[J].Journal of public administration research & theory, 2013, 23(1):27-54.
[28] 张云翔, 容志.我国社区服务共同生产的形成机制研究——以上海市R社区微更新为例[J].上海行政学院学报, 2021(3):93-100.
[29] BOVAIRD T.Beyond engagement and participation:user and community coproduction of public services[J].Public administration review, 2007, 67(5):846-860.
[30] 周新辉, 刘佳.农村公共文化服务体系建设现状及多维思考——以山东省为例[J].安徽农业科学, 2017(8):203-206, 246.
[31] 容志, 张云翔.从专业生产到共同生产:城市社区公共服务供给的范式转型[J].甘肃行政学院学报, 2020(6):91-101.
[32] NEEDHAM C.Realising the potential of co-production:negotiating improvements in public services[J].Social policy & society, 2008, 7(2):221-231.
[33] 拉金.重新设计社会科学研究[M].杜运周, 等译.北京:机械工业出版社, 2019:128.
[34] VIS B.The comparative advantages of fsQCA and regression analysis for moderately large-n analysis[J].Sociological methods and research, 2012, 41(1):168-198.
[35] 里豪克斯, 拉金.QCA设计原理与应用:超越定性与定量研究的新方法[M].杜运周, 李永发, 等译.北京:机械工业出版社, 2018:19.
[36] 段宇锋, 金晓明.中国公共图书馆创新案例[M].上海:上海交通大学出版社, 2020.
[37] CRILLY D.Predicting stakeholder orientation in the multinational enterprise:a mid-range theory[J].Journal of international business studies, 2011(42):694-717.
[38] 山少男, 段霞.复杂性视角下公共危机多元主体协同治理行为的影响因素与行动路径——基于元分析与模糊集QCA的双重分析[J].公共管理与政策评论, 2022(1):104-119.
[39] NABATCHI T, SANCINO A, SICILIA M.Varieties of participation in public services:the who, when, and what of coproduction[J].Public administration review, 2017, 77(5):766-776.
[40] VAN DER HEIJDEN J.The role of government in voluntary environmental programmes:a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis[J].Public administration, 2015, 93(3):576-592.
[41] FISS P C.Building better casual theories:a fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research[J].The academy of management journal, 2011, 54(2):393-420.
[42] HOSSAIN M A, QUADDUS M, WARREN M, AKTER S, PAPPAS I.Are you a cyberbully on social media? exploring the personality traits using a fuzzy-set configurational approach[J].International journal of information management, 2022, 66:102537.
[43] 张明, 杜运周.组织与管理研究中QCA方法的应用:定位、策略和方向[J].管理学报, 2019(9):1312-1323.
[44] WHITE L, LOCKETT A, CURRIE, G, HAYTON J.Hybrid context, management practices and organizational performance:a configurational approach[J].Journal of management studies, 2021, 58(3):718-748.
[45] 宫昌俊, 曹磊.江苏江阴市:推动城市阅读联盟的实践探索[J].国家图书馆学刊, 2015(4):16-20.
[46] 韩曜.人口城市化背景下公共图书馆服务的探索研究——以上海市虹口区"菜场书屋"项目为例[J].图书馆建设, 2016(2):81-85, 95.
[47] 陆海燕.超越参与:公共服务中的共同生产[J].中共福建省委党校学报, 2019(4):118-126.
[48] 屈义华, 黄佩芳.佛山市邻里图书馆项目:缘起、路径与成效[J].图书馆论坛, 2021(4):5-9.
[49] 张宇.走向更有序的公共行动:数智时代公众政策参与的质态变迁[J].行政论坛, 2022, 29(3):67-74.

基于fsQCA的公共阅读空间有效运行路径分析——以共同生产理论为研究视角

Analysis of the Effective Operation Path of Public Reading Space Based on fsQCA: Taking Co-Production Theory as a Research Perspective

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 3

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	戴艳清, 孙英姿. 基于KANO模型的新型公共阅读空间服务内容供给优先序研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(22): 73-82.
[2]	戴艳清, 郑童. 长沙市民间自办公共阅读空间发展研究——以雨花区“和+共享图书馆”为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(20): 42-49.
[3]	司新丽. 北京新型公共阅读空间:特点、价值与发展对策[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(11): 64-70.