开放政府数据用户采纳意向影响机制研究

doi:10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2023.08.001

图书情报工作 ›› 2023, Vol. 67 ›› Issue (8): 4-17.DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2023.08.001

• 专题：开放政府数据使用、制度评价与隐私风险控制研究 • 上一篇下一篇

开放政府数据用户采纳意向影响机制研究

陈美¹, 梁乙凯², 陈朝兵³

1 中南财经政法大学公共管理学院武汉 430073;
2 山东财经大学管理科学与工程学院济南 250014;
3 西南财经大学公共管理学院成都 611130

收稿日期:2022-11-02 修回日期:2023-01-02 出版日期:2023-04-20 发布日期:2023-04-25
通讯作者: 陈朝兵,副教授,博士,通信作者,E-mail:chencb@swufe.edu.cn
作者简介:陈美，副教授，博士；梁乙凯，副教授，博士
基金资助:
本文系国家自然科学基金“面向用户的开放政府数据使用行为机理及隐私风险控制研究”(项目编号：72004056)研究成果之一。

Research on Impact Mechanism of Users’ Adoption Intention of Open Government Data

Chen Mei¹, Liang Yikai², Chen Chaobing³

1 School of Public Administration, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073;
2 School of Management Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Finance and Economics, Jinan 250014;
3 School of Public Administration, Southwest University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130

Received:2022-11-02 Revised:2023-01-02 Online:2023-04-20 Published:2023-04-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： [目的/意义] 探究用户对开放政府数据（OGD）采纳的关键因素以及作用机制，以为开放政府数据在信息系统用户采纳领域的发展提供参考和依据。[方法/过程] 基于信任理论、技术接受模型、理性行为理论，提出开放政府数据用户采纳整合模型，并利用偏最小二乘法—结构方程模型（PLS-SEM）和定性比较分析（QCA）对数据进行分析。[结果/结论] PLS-SEM结果表明，用户态度对OGD采纳意向具有显著影响，而感知有用性和主观规范对OGD采纳意向的影响不显著。QCA结果发现3种导致OGD高采纳意向的组态，以及4种导致OGD低采纳意向的组态。研究结果期望对用户采纳OGD影响因素和作用机制提供理论和方法借鉴。

关键词: 开放政府数据, 技术接受模型, 理性行为理论, 采纳意向, 结构方程模型, 定性比较分析

Abstract: [Purpose/Significance] The research on the key factors and mechanism that influence users’ adoption of open government data (OGD) can provide guidance for the development of OGD in the field of user adoption of information systems. This study first expounds the basic concepts and backgrounds about open data, open government data, and big data. [Method/Process] Based on the trust theory, technology acceptance model, theory of reasoned action, this study put forward an integrated model for open government data user adoption, and empirically tested data using both partial least square structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) and qualitative comparative analysis (QCA). [Result/Conclusion] PLS-SEM results show that attitude has a significant impact on OGD adoption intention, while perceived usefulness and subjective norms have no significant impact on OGD adoption intention. QCA results identify three configurations that result in high adoption intention for OGD, and four configurations that lead to low adoption intention for OGD. Our research results are expected to provide theoretical and methodological implications for the influence mechanism of user-oriented OGD adoption.

Key words: open government data, technology acceptance model, theory of reasoned action, adoption intention, structural equation model, qualitative comparative analysis

中图分类号:

G203

陈美, 梁乙凯, 陈朝兵. 开放政府数据用户采纳意向影响机制研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2023, 67(8): 4-17.

Chen Mei, Liang Yikai, Chen Chaobing. Research on Impact Mechanism of Users’ Adoption Intention of Open Government Data[J]. Library and Information Service, 2023, 67(8): 4-17.

参考文献

[1] 陈美, 何祺. 基于文本挖掘的我国省级政府开放数据平台比较研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(7):88-98.
[2] 黄如花, 李白杨, 周力虹. 2005-2015年国内外政府数据开放共享研究述评[J]. 情报学报, 2016, 35(12):1323-1334.
[3] 赵宇翔, 刘周颖, 刘炜, 等. 创意类开放数据竞赛作品评价指标体系构建与测定——以数字人文项目为例[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2020, 46(2):75-95.
[4] 陈美. 面向增值利用的开放政府数据商业应用研究[J]. 图书馆, 2017(12):25-30.
[5] 杜运周, 贾良定. 组态视角与定性比较分析(QCA):管理学研究的一条新道路[J]. 管理世界, 2017(6):155-167.
[6] 池毛毛, 杜运周, 王伟军. 组态视角与定性比较分析方法:图书情报学实证研究的新道路[J]. 情报学报, 2021, 40(4):424-434.
[7] HOSSAIN M, CHAN C. Open data adoption in Australian government agencies:an exploratory study[EB/OL].[2023-02-22]. https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1606/1606.02500.pdf.
[8] ALHUJAYLAN A, CAR L, RYAN M. An investigation of factors influencing private technology organizations' intention to adopt open government data in Saudi Arabia[C]//Annual cmputing and communication wrkshop and conference. Las Vegas:IEEE, 2020:654-661.
[9] NURAKMAL M, HANUM F, HAMID S. Post-adoption of open government data initiatives in public sectors[EB/OL].[2023-02-22]. https://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2017/274/.
[10] ZUIDERWIJK A, JANSSEN M, DWIVEDI Y K. Acceptance and use predictors of open data technologies:drawing upon the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology[J]. Government information quarterly, 2015, 32(4):429-440.
[11] WANG H J, LO J. Adoption of open government data among government agencies[J]. Government information quarterly, 2016, 33(1):80-88.
[12] JURISCH M C, KAUTZ M, WOLF P, et al. An international survey of the factors influencing the intention to use open government[C]//Hawaii international conference on system sciences. Kauai, Hi:IEEE, 2015:2188-2198.
[13] TALUKDER M S, SHEN L, TALUKDER M F H, et al. Determinants of user acceptance and use of open government data (OGD):an empirical investigation in Bangladesh[J]. Technology in society, 2019, 56(2):147-156.
[14] RIHOUX B, RAGIN C C. Configurational comparative methods:qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques[M]. Thousand Oaks:Sage, 2009.
[15] GEFEN D, KARAHANNA E, STRAUB D W. Trust and TAM in online shopping:an integrated model[J]. MIS quarterly, 2003, 27(1):51-90.
[16] CHOW S, HOLDEN R. Toward an understanding of loyalty:the moderating role of trust[J]. Journal of managerial issues, 1997, 9(3):275-298.
[17] MOORE K R. Trust and relationship commitment in logistics alliances:a buyer perspective[J]. International journal of purchasing and materials management, 1998, 34(4):24-37.
[18] LEE M K O, TURBAN E. A trust model for consumer Internet shopping[J]. International journal of electronic commerce, 2001, 6(1):75-91.
[19] SHAMDASANI P N, BALAKRISHNAN A A. Determinants of relationship quality and loyalty in personalized services[J]. Asia pacific journal of management, 2000, 17(3):399-422.
[20] BéLANGER F, CARTER L. Trust and risk in e-government adoption[J]. The journal of strategic information systems, 2008, 17(2):165-176.
[21] LEAN O K, ZAILANI S, RAMAYAH T, et al. Factors influencing intention to use e-government services among citizens in Malaysia[J]. International journal of information management, 2009, 29(6):458-475.
[22] TEO T S H, SRIVASTAVA S C, JIANG L. Trust and electronic government success:an empirical study[J]. Journal of management information systems, 2008, 25(3):99-132.
[23] FITRIANI W R, HIDAYANTO A N, SANDHYADUHITA P I, et al. Determinants of intention to use open data website:an insight from Indonesia[EB/OL].[2023-02-22]. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Achmad-Hidayanto-2/publication/320015225_Determinants_of_Intention_to_Use_Open_Data_Website_An_Insight_from_Indonesia/links/59c8ae1d0f7e9bd2c017d74a/Determinants-of-Intention-toUse-Open-Data-Website-An-Insight-from-Indonesia.pdf.
[24] CARTER L, BéLANGER F. The utilization of e-government services:citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors[J]. Information systems journal, 2005, 15(1):5-25.
[25] DAVIS F D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology[J]. MIS quarterly, 1989, 13(3):319-340.
[26] FISHBEIN M, AJZEN I. Belief, attitude, intention and behavior:an introduction to theory and research[EB/OL].[2023-02-22].https://www.researchgate.net/profile/IcekAjzen/publication/233897090_Belief_attitude_intention_and_behaviour_An_introduction_to_theory_and_research/links/55ad2c1b08ae98e661a405b0/Belief-attitude-intention-andbehaviour-An-introduction-to-theory-and-research.pdf.
[27] SHEPPARD B H, HARTWICK J, WARSHAW P R. The theory of reasoned action:a meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research[J]. Journal of consumer research, 1988, 15(3):325-343.
[28] SHEN Y C, HUANG C Y, CHU C H, et al. A benefit-cost perspective of the consumer adoption of the mobile banking system[J]. Behaviour & information technology, 2010, 29(5):497-511.
[29] JACKSON J D, YI M Y, PARK J S. An empirical test of three mediation models for the relationship between personal innovativeness and user acceptance of technology[J]. Information & management, 2013, 50(4):154-161.
[30] PENNINGTON R, WILCOX H D, GROVER V. The role of system trust in business-to-consumer transactions[J]. Journal of management information systems, 2003, 20(3):197-226.
[31] LNĚNIČKA M, NIKIFOROVA A, SAXENA S, et al. Investigation into the adoption of open government data among students:the behavioural intention-based comparative analysis of three countries[J]. Aslib journal of information management, 2022, 74(3):549-567.
[32] LANKTON N K, MCKNIGHT D H. What does it mean to trust facebook? examining technology and interpersonal trust beliefs[J]. ACM SIGMIS database:the DATABASE for advances in information systems, 2011, 42(2):32-54.
[33] MAYER R C, DAVIS J H, SCHOORMAN F D. An integrative model of organizational trust[J]. Academy of management review, 1995, 20(3):709-734.
[34] MCKNIGHT D H, CARTER M, THATCHER J B, et al. Trust in a specific technology:an investigation of its components and measures[J]. ACM transactions on management information systems, 2011, 2(2):1-25.
[35] ORTEGA EGEA J M, ROMáN GONZáLEZ M V. Explaining physicians' acceptance of EHCR systems:an extension of TAM with trust and risk factors[J]. Computers in human behavior, 2011, 27(1):319-332.
[36] AL-JABRI I M. The intention to use mobile banking:further evidence from Saudi Arabia[J]. South African journal of business management, 2015, 46(1):23-34.
[37] MONTAZEMI A R, QAHRI-SAREMI H. Factors affecting adoption of online banking:a meta-analytic structural equation modeling study[J]. Information & management, 2015, 52(2):210-226.
[38] SOUZA A A C D, D'ANGELO M J, LIMA FILHO R N. Effects of predictors of citizens' attitudes and intention to use open government data and government 2.0[J]. Government information quarterly, 2022, 39(2):101663.
[39] LAI Y H, HUANG F F, YANG H H. A study on the attitude of use the mobile clinic registration system in Taiwan[J]. Technology and health care, 2016, 24(S1):205-211.
[40] KHURSHID M M, ZAKARIA N H, ARFEEN M I, et al. Factors influencing citizens' intention to use open government data-a case study of Pakistan[J]. Big data and cognitive computing, 2022, 6(1):1-22.
[41] 王锰, 陈雅. 面向用户的公共图书馆社会影响机制分析框架研究[J]. 图书馆, 2017(11):9-15.
[42] SHAH I A, 王芳. 巴基斯坦政府门户网站公众初始接受的影响因素研究——基于使用意向和执行意向双重视角[J]. 情报学报, 2019, 38(5):543-556.
[43] RESTI-FITRIANI W, HIDAYANTO A N, SANDHYADUHITA P I, et al. Determinants of continuance intention to use open data Website:an insight from Indonesia[J]. Pacific asia journal of the association for information systems, 2019, 11(2):96-120.
[44] HU L T, BENTLER P M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis:conventional criteria versus new alternatives[J]. Structural equation modeling:a multidisciplinary journal, 1999, 6(1):1-55.
[45] ANSARI B, BARATI M, MARTIN E G. Enhancing the usability and usefulness of open government data:a comprehensive review of the state of open government data visualization research[J]. Government information quarterly, 2022, 39(1):101657.
[46] HAIR J F, HULT G T M, RINGLE C M, et al. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM)[M]. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks:Sage, 2021.
[47] WOODSIDE A G. Moving beyond multiple regression analysis to algorithms:calling for adoption of a paradigm shift from symmetric to asymmetric thinking in data analysis and crafting theory[J]. Journal of business research, 2013, 66(4):463-472.
[48] RIGDON E E, SARSTEDT M, RINGLE C M. On comparing results from CB-SEM and PLS-SEM:five perspectives and five recommendations[J]. Marketing:ZFP-journal of research and management, 2017, 39(3):4-16.
[49] HAIR J F, RISHER JEFFREY J, SARSTEDT M, et al. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM[J]. European business review, 2019, 31(1):2-24.
[50] PAPPAS I O, WOODSIDE A G. Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA):guidelines for research practice in information systems and marketing[J]. International journal of information management, 2021, 58:102310.
[51] FORNELL C, LARCKER D F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error[J]. Journal of marketing research, 1981, 18(1):39-50.
[52] 梁乙凯, 戚桂杰. 基于模糊集定性比较分析的政府开放数据使用影响因素研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2019, 38(3):180-186.
[53] FISS P C. A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations[J]. Academy of management review, 2007, 32(4):1180-1198.
[54] 郭高晶, 胡广伟. 我国数字政府建设绩效的影响因素与生成路径——基于31省案例的模糊集定性比较分析[J]. 重庆社会科学, 2022(3):41-55.
[55] KHURSHID M M, ZAKARIA N H, RASHID A, et al. Examining the factors of open government data usability from academician's perspective[J]. International journal of information technology project management, 2018, 9(3):72-85.
[56] WEERAKKODY V, KAPOOR K, BALTA M E, et al. Factors influencing user acceptance of public sector big open data[J]. Production planning & control, 2017, 28(11/12):891-905.

开放政府数据用户采纳意向影响机制研究

Research on Impact Mechanism of Users’ Adoption Intention of Open Government Data

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	陈美, 郝志豪, 曹语嫣, 何祺. 我国地方政府开放数据制度评价与运行效果研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2023, 67(8): 18-29.
[2]	陈美, 曹语嫣, 陈朝兵. 开放政府数据使用意愿影响因素：元分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2023, 67(8): 30-39.
[3]	陈美, 何祺. 开放政府数据的隐私风险关键影响因素识别[J]. 图书情报工作, 2023, 67(8): 40-49.
[4]	范蕴玉, 张宇. 基于fsQCA的公共阅读空间有效运行路径分析——以共同生产理论为研究视角[J]. 图书情报工作, 2023, 67(4): 11-20.
[5]	李晓虹, 李莎, 王宇, 武美然. 高校图书馆空间再造促进学生学习与成功的实证研究——基于QCA定性比较分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(21): 29-38.
[6]	梁兴堃, 陈诺. 图书馆用户的信息素养对借阅行为的影响机理研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(21): 87-96.
[7]	邹纯龙, 马海群, 王今. 美国国家情报评估的影响因素与模式概化研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(2): 13-21.
[8]	付熙雯, 郑磊. 开放政府数据的价值:研究进展与展望[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020, 64(9): 122-132.
[9]	卢恒, 张向先, 张莉曼, 郭顺利. 理性与偏差视角下在线问答社区用户知识付费意愿影响因素构型研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020, 64(19): 89-98.
[10]	付熙雯, 郑磊. 开放政府数据的价值测量:特征与方法的比较研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020, 64(19): 140-152.
[11]	郭宇, 郭勇, 赵宇翔. 内容还是情境:在线用户知识付费行为机理研究——一项基于CCC-B框架的组态分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020, 64(1): 120-130.
[12]	李超, 张奇云. 图书馆消减民众信息搜寻焦虑的实证分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2019, 63(15): 85-93.
[13]	黄如花, 温芳芳, 黄雯. 我国政府数据开放共享政策体系构建[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(9): 5-13.
[14]	司莉, 赵洁. 美国开放政府数据元数据标准及启示[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(3): 86-93.
[15]	陈晓宇, 付少雄, 邓胜利. 社会化问答用户信息搜寻的影响因素研究——一种混合方法的视角[J]. 图书情报工作, 2018, 62(20): 102-111.