国际开放科学研究进展

doi:10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2021.01.019

图书情报工作 ›› 2021, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (1): 140-149.DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2021.01.019

所属专题：图书情报与档案管理前沿热点专辑

• 图书情报与档案管理前沿热点专辑 • 上一篇下一篇

国际开放科学研究进展

黄如花, 赵洋, 黄雨婷

武汉大学信息管理学院武汉 430072

收稿日期:2020-04-30 修回日期:2020-09-18 出版日期:2021-01-05 发布日期:2021-01-05
通讯作者: 赵洋(ORCID:0000-0003-1705-1069),博士研究生,通讯作者,E-mail:zhaoyang_whu@163.com
作者简介:黄如花(ORCID:0000-0003-4250-1914),教授,博士生导师,博士;黄雨婷(ORCID:0000-0003-2444-4856),博士研究生。

Research Progress in the International Research of Open Science

Huang Ruhua, Zhao Yang, Huang Yuting

School of Information Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072

Received:2020-04-30 Revised:2020-09-18 Online:2021-01-05 Published:2021-01-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： [目的/意义] 开放科学可以使科学研究更具协作性、透明性和高效性，已引起全世界的广泛关注。从国际视角梳理和分析开放科学当前研究主题有利于推动该领域发展，为后续研究提供参考和借鉴。[方法/过程] 运用文献调查与信息可视化相结合的方法，选取Web of Science平台收录的关于开放科学研究的论文，并结合相关政府文件、研究报告、新闻报道等文献，揭示国际开放科学研究的主题分布。[结果/结论] 国际开放科学的研究主题包括：开放获取研究、数据共享研究、成果重用研究、知识创新研究、基础设施建设研究。未来建议从政策体系、基础设施、主体参与3个方面进行系统、深入研究。

关键词: 开放科学, 开放数据, 开放获取, 数据共享

Abstract: [Purpose/significance] Open science can make scientific research more collaborative, transparent and efficient, which has attracted widespread attention worldwide. Sorting out and analyzing the current research themes of open science from an international perspective is conducive to promoting the development of this field and providing reference and experience for subsequent research. [Method/process] Using a mixed method which combine literature survey and information visualization, this paper analyzed articles on open science included in the Web of Science platform, combined with relevant policies, research reports, news and other literature. The theme distribution of international research on open science was analyzed. [Result/conclusion] The research topics of open science include: open access, data sharing, research reuse, knowledge innovation, and infrastructure construction. In the future, it is recommended to conduct a systematic and in-depth study from three aspects of policy system, infrastructure and subject participation.

Key words: open science, open data, open access, data sharing

中图分类号:

G250.73

黄如花, 赵洋, 黄雨婷. 国际开放科学研究进展[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(1): 140-149.

Huang Ruhua, Zhao Yang, Huang Yuting. Research Progress in the International Research of Open Science[J]. LIS, 2021, 65(1): 140-149.

参考文献

[1] UNESCO. UNESCO mobilizes 122 countries to promote open science and reinforced cooperation in the face of COVID-19[EB/OL].[2020-06-10]. https://en.unesco.org/news/unesco-mobilizes-122-countries-promote-open-science-and-reinforced-cooperation-face-covid-19.
[2] UNESCO. UNESCO takes the lead in developing a new global standard-setting instrument on open science[EB/OL].[2020-06-20]. https://en.unesco.org/news/unesco-takes-lead-developing-new-global-standard-setting-instrument-open-science.
[3] VICENTE-SÁEZ R, MARTÍNEZ-FUENTES C. Open Science now:a systematic literature review for an integrated definition[J]. Journal of business research, 2018, 88:428-436.
[4] DAI Q, SHIN E, SMITH C. Open and inclusive collaboration in science:a framework[EB/OL].[2019-12-20]. https://doi.org/10.1787/2dbff737-en.
[5] COOK B G, LLOYD J W, THERRIEN W J. Open science in the field of emotional and behavioral disorders[J]. Education and treatment of children, 2019, 42(4):579-600.
[6] BANKS G C, FIELD J G, OSWALD F L, et al. Answers to 18 questions about open science practices[J]. Journal of business and psychology, 2019, 34(3):257-270.
[7] 盛小平,杨智勇. 开放科学、开放共享、开放数据三者关系解析[J]. 图书情报工作,2019,63(17):15-22.
[8] 刘桂锋,钱锦琳,田丽丽. 开放科学:概念辨析、体系解析与理念探析[J]. 图书馆论坛,2018,38(11):1-9.
[9] 黄雨婷,赖彤. 美国开放科学中心:实践进展、特点与启示[J]. 图书与情报,2019(3):105-113.
[10] FECHER B, FRIESIKE S. Open science:one term, five schools of thought[M]//Opening science. New York:Springer, 2014:17-47.
[11] European Commission. Open science[EB/OL].[2020-06-15]. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/open-science.
[12] FOSTER. Open science definition[EB/OL].[2020-06-02]. https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/taxonomy/term/100.
[13] CHAN L, CUPLINSKAS D, EISEN M, et al. Read the budapest open access initiative[EB/OL].[2020-06-05]. https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read.
[14] UNESCO. Open science movement[EB/OL].[2020-06-05]. http://www.unesco.org/new/en/communication-and-information/portals-and-platforms/goap/open-science-movement/.
[15] LAAKSO M, WELLING P, BUKVOVA H, et al. The development of open access journal publishing from 1993 to 2009[J]. Plos one, 2011, 6(6):e20961.
[16] PIWOWAR H, PRIEM J, LARIVIÈRE V, et al. The state of OA:a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of open access articles[J]. Peer J, 2018, 6:e4375.
[17] BJÖRK B C. Gold, green, and black open access[J]. Learned publishing, 2017, 30(2):173-175.
[18] VALDERRAMA-ZURIÁN J C, AGUILAR-MOYA R, GORRAIZ J. On the bibliometric nature of a foreseeable relationship:open access and education[J]. Scientometrics, 2019, 120(3):1031-1057.
[19] ZHANG L, WATSON E. The prevalence of green and grey open access:where do physical science researchers archive their publications?[J]. Scientometrics, 2018, 117(3):2021-2035.
[20] DOBUSCH L, HEIMSTÄDT M. Predatory publishing in management research:a call for open peer review[J]. Management learning, 2019, 50(5):607-619.
[21] ROSS-HELLAUER T. What is open peer review? A systematic review[J]. F1000 research, 2017, 6:1-38.
[22] LAWRENCE S. Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact[J]. Nature, 2001, 411:521.
[23] HAJJEM C, HARNAD S, GINGRAS Y. Ten-year cross-disciplinary comparison of the growth of open access and how it increases research citation impact[J]. IEEE data engineering bulletin, 2005, 28(4):39-47.
[24] MCKIERNAN E C, BOURNE P E, BROWN C T, et al. How open science helps researchers succeed[J]. ELife, 2016, 5:e16800.
[25] HOLLEY R P. Open access:current overview and future prospects[J]. Library trends, 2018, 67(2):214-240.
[26] WANG X, LIU C, MAO W, et al. The open access advantage considering citation, article usage and social media attention[J]. Scientometrics, 2015, 103(2):555-564.
[27] TENNANT J P, WALDNER F, JACQUES D C, et al. The academic, economic and societal impacts of open access:an evidence-based review[J]. F1000 research, 2016, 5:1-49.
[28] FELL M J. The economic impacts of open science:a rapid evidence assessment[J]. Publications, 2019, 7(3):1-30.
[29] HAMPTON S E, ANDERSON S S, BAGBY S C, et al. The Tao of open science for ecology[J]. Ecosphere, 2015, 6(7):1-13.
[30] ROUDER J N. The what, why, and how of born-open data[J]. Behavior research methods, 2016, 48(3):1062-1069.
[31] HARDWICKE T E, MATHUR M B, MACDONALD K, et al. Data availability, reusability, and analytic reproducibility:evaluating the impact of a mandatory open data policy at the journal cognition[J]. Royal Society open science, 2018, 5(8):180448.
[32] European Commission. Open science (Open access)[EB/OL].[2020-07-20]. https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/open-science-open-access.
[33] ZUIDERWIJK A, JANSSEN M. Open data policies, their implementation and impact:a framework for comparison[J]. Government information quarterly, 2014, 31(1):17-29.
[34] NEYLON C. Compliance culture or culture change? The role of funders in improving data management and sharing practice amongst researchers[J]. Research ideas and outcomes, 2017, 3:e14673.
[35] JONES L, GRANT R, HRYNASZKIEWICZ I. Implementing publisher policies that inform, support and encourage authors to share data:two case studies[J]. Insights, 2019, 32(1):1-11.
[36] ROUSI A M, LAAKSO M. Journal research data sharing policies:A study of highly-cited journals in neuroscience, physics, and operations research[J]. Scientometrics, 2020,124:131-152.
[37] NAUGHTON L, KERNOHAN D. Making sense of journal research data policies[J]. Insights, 2016, 29(1):84-89.
[38] GORMAN D M. Availability of research data in high-impact addiction journals with data sharing policies[J]. Science and engineering ethics, 2020, 26(3):1625-1632.
[39] Data Policy and Standardisation and Implementation Interest Group. Journal and publisher research data policy master framework DRAFT v1.2 Feb 2018[EB/OL].[2020-06-20]. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DTAfOKkE1a2n2f_1hGcrXlrw-5Tq_AL5tk-ju8B82_E/edit.
[40] YANCY C W, Harrington R A, Bonow R O. Data sharing-The time has (not yet?) come[J]. JAMA cardiology, 2018, 3(9):797-798.
[41] ABELE-BREHM A E, GOLLWITZER M, STEINBERG U, et al. Attitudes toward open science and public data sharing:a survey among members of the German Psychological Society[J]. Social psychology, 2019, 50(4):252-260.
[42] ROCKHOLD F W. Statistical controversies in clinical research:data access and sharing-can we be more transparent about clinical research? Let's do what's right for patients[J]. Annals of oncology, 2017, 28(8):1734-1737.
[43] THOROGOOD A. Canada:will privacy rules continue to favour open science?[J]. Human genetics, 2018, 137(8):595-602.
[44] HOEYER K, TUPASELA A, RASMUSSEN M B. Ethics policies and ethics work in cross-national genetic research and data sharing:flows, nonflows, and overflows[J]. Science, technology & human values, 2017, 42(3):381-404.
[45] ZUIDERWIJK A, SPIERS H. Sharing and re-using open data:a case study of motivations in astrophysics[J]. International journal of information management, 2019, 49:228-241.
[46] ROCKHOLD F, BROMLEY C, WAGNER E K, et al. Open science:the open clinical trials data journey[J]. Clinical trials, 2019, 16(5):539-546.
[47] CHAWINGA W D, ZINN S. Global perspectives of research data sharing:a systematic literature review[J]. Library & information science research, 2019, 41(2):109-122.
[48] ROSS J S, WALDSTREICHER J, BAMFORD S, et al. Overview and experience of the YODA Project with clinical trial data sharing after 5 years[J]. Scientific data, 2018, 5:180268.
[49] LEFAIVRE S C, BEHAN B, VACCARINO A L, et al. Big data needs big governance:best practices from Brain-CODE, the Ontario Brain Institute's neuroinformatics platform[J]. Frontiers in genetics, 2019, 10:191.
[50] CAPUZZI S J, KIM I S J, LAM W I, et al. Chembench:A publicly accessible, integrated cheminformatics portal[J]. Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2017, 57(2):105-108.
[51] National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Reproducibility and replicability in science[M]. Washington:The National Academies Press, 2019.
[52] MARWICK B. Computational reproducibility in archaeological research:basic principles and a case study of their implementation[J]. Journal of archaeological method and theory, 2017, 24(2):424-450.
[53] BRITO J J, LI J, MOORE J H, et al. Recommendations to enhance rigor and reproducibility in biomedical research[J]. Gigascience, 2020, 9(6):giaa103.
[54] HETTNE K, PROPPERT R, NAB L, et al. ReprohackNL 2019:how libraries can promote research reproducibility through community engagement[EB/OL].[2020-07-17]. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/6f4zv.
[55] MELLOR D T. Guidelines for Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) in journal policies and practices "The TOP Guidelines"[EB/OL].[2020-07-17]. https://osf.io/9f6gx/wiki/Guidelines/.
[56] LEWANDOWSKY S, OBERAUER K. Low replicability can support robust and efficient science[J]. Nature communications, 2020, 11:358.
[57] LARSON M J. Improving the rigor and replicability of applied psychophysiology research:sample size, standardization, transparency, and preregistration[J]. Biofeedback, 2020, 48(1):2-6.
[58] BENTWICH M. Changing the rules of the game:addressing the conflict between free access to scientific discovery and intellectual property rights[J]. Nature biotechnology, 2010, 28(2):137-140.
[59] GANS J S, MURRAY F E, STERN S. Contracting over the disclosure of scientific knowledge:intellectual property and academic publication[J]. Research policy, 2017, 46(4):820-835.
[60] OWENS B. Montreal instiute going "open" to accelerate science[EB/OL].[2020-07-10]. http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/01/montreal-institute-going-open-accelerate-science.
[61] Open Data Institute. Publisher's guide to open data licensing[EB/OL].[2020-07-10]. https://theodi.org/article/publishers-guide-to-open-data-licensing/.
[62] KORN N, OPPENHEIM C. Licensing open data:a practical guide[EB/OL].[2020-07-10]. http://discovery.ac.uk/files/pdf/Licensing_Open_Data_A_Practical_Guide.pdf.
[63] ROSEN L. Open source licensing:software freedom and intellectual property law[M]. Upper Saddle River:Prentice Hall, 2004.
[64] Open Source Hardware Association. Open-Source hardware FAQ[EB/OL].[2020-07-15]. http://www.oshwa.org/faq/.
[65] LUIS FELIPE R M, KAUTTU P, LAIA P P, et al. Open hardware licences:Parallels and contrasts[EB/OL].[2020-08-31]. https://helda.helsinki.fi/bitstream/handle/10138/312235/ki0119833enn.pdf?sequence=1.
[66] ALTUNAY M, AVERY P, BLACKBURN K, et al. A science driven production cyberinfrastructure-the open science grid[J]. Journal of grid computing, 2011, 9(2):201-218.
[67] DE ROURE D, GOBLE C, ALEKSEJEVS S, et al. Towards open science:the myExperiment approach[J]. Concurrency and computation:practice and experience, 2010, 22(17):2335-2353.
[68] NISHIKAWA K. How are research data governed at Japanese repositories? A knowledge commons perspective[J]. Aslib journal of information management, 2020, 72(5):837-852.
[69] XAFIS V, LABUDE M K. Openness in big data and data repositories:the application of an ethics framework for big data in health and research[J]. Asian bioethics review, 2019, 11(3):255-273.
[70] OECD. Business models for sustainable research data repositories[EB/OL].[2020-07-22]. https://doi.org/10.1787/302b12bb-en.
[71] United Nations. Open science conference 2019[EB/OL].[2020-07-10]. http://research.un.org/conferences/OpenScienceUN.
[72] 顾立平. 科研模式变革中的数据管理服务:实现开放获取、开放数据、开放科学的途径[J]. 中国图书馆学报,2018,44(6):43-58.
[73] UNESCO. Preliminary study of the technical, financial and legal aspects of the desirability of a UNESCO recommendation on open science[R/OL].[2020-07-05]. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000370291.
[74] WILKINSON M, DUMONTIER M, AALBERSBERG I. et al. The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship[J]. Scientific data, 2016, 3:160018.
[75] European Commission. Open science policy platform recommendations[EB/OL].[2020-07-02]. https://ec.europa.eu/research/openscience/pdf/integrated_advice_opspp_recommendations.pdf#view=fit&pagemode=none.
[76] FOSTER. About FOSTER[EB/OL].[2020-07-02]. https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/about.
[77] Center for Open Science. Openness and reproducibility research practices training[EB/OL].[2020-07-02]. https://cos.io/our-services/training-services/.
[78] UNESCO. World science day for peace and development[EB/OL].[2020-07-02]. https://zh.unesco.org/commemorations/worldscienceday#theme.
[79] 金瑛,张晓林,胡智慧. 公众科学的发展与挑战[J]. 图书情报工作, 2019,63(13):28-33.

国际开放科学研究进展

Research Progress in the International Research of Open Science

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	陈美, 何祺. 基于文本挖掘的我国省级政府开放数据平台比较研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(7): 88-98.
[2]	薛翔, 赵宇翔, 朱庆华, 应峻, 郝世博. 基于公众科学模式的重大公共卫生事件开放数据服务生态系统构建[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(4): 33-44.
[3]	钟明, 钱庆, 吴思竹. 国外医学科学数据隐私保护实践及启示[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(24): 128-139.
[4]	崔丽媛, 朱亚鑫, 曲波. 钻石开放获取模式的特点、潜在问题及解决建议[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(23): 62-71.
[5]	张蒂, 朱江. 中国科学院文献情报系统开放科学政策和实践概述[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(23): 137-149.
[6]	吴金华, 石静, 徐健. 面向数字人文的开放数据生态系统:构成要素与模型框架[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(22): 44-54.
[7]	姜天海, 贾萍萍, 张增一. 政策工具视角下欧美国家与国际组织开放科学政策文本分析及其启示[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(22): 119-133.
[8]	崔丽媛, 朱亚鑫, 曲波. 国外开放获取馆员:岗位设置、核心角色与我国培养策略[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(19): 72-83.
[9]	陆丽娜, 尹居峰, 于啸, 尹丽红. 基于联盟链的农业科学数据共享模型构建研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(17): 60-68.
[10]	黄国彬, 刘磊, 孙静彤. 注册式研究报告的可著作权性研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(14): 20-28.
[11]	黄国彬, 毕子晗, 孙静彤, 付映宏. 科研人员对注册式研究报告的认知水平及其提升策略研究——基于北京8所“双一流”高校的调研[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(1): 89-95.
[12]	芮啸, 赵展一, 王昉, 陈雪飞, 黄金霞. 全球OA科技期刊APC监测与异常预警模型研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(8): 42-50.
[13]	储节旺, 丁辉. 美国政府开放数据个人隐私保护政策及对我国的启示——基于52个政策文本的内容分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(8): 140-150.
[14]	代佳欣. 英美新三国政府开放数据用户参与的经验与启示[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(6): 23-31.
[15]	崔丽媛, 刘春丽. 开放获取S计划演进历程、动因及对我国的启示[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(4): 102-110.