高级检索|图表检索

图书情报工作 ›› 2021, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (14): 30-39.DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2021.14.004

• 理论研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

智慧图书馆建设评价指标体系构建与解析

段美珍1,2, 初景利3,4, 张冬荣3,4, 张颖3,4   

  1. 1 军事科学院军事科学信息研究中心 北京 100142;
    2 军事科学院图书馆 北京 100039;
    3 中国科学院文献情报中心 北京 100190;
    4 中国科学院大学经济管理学院图书情报与档案管理系 北京 100190
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-09 出版日期:2021-07-20 发布日期:2021-07-21
  • 通讯作者: 初景利(ORCID:0000-0003-0723-3985),期刊出版运营总监,系主任,教授,博士,博士生导师,通讯作者,E-mail:chujl@mail.las.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:段美珍(ORCID:0000-0002-6924-1852),《中华医学图书情报杂志》副主编,馆员,博士;张冬荣(ORCID:0000-0002-0745-3681),研究生教育处处长,系副主任兼信息素养教研室主任,研究馆员,硕士生导师;张颖(ORCID:0000-0002-1686-524X),博士研究生。
  • 基金资助:
    本文系国家社会科学基金重大项目"新时代我国文献信息资源保障体系重构研究"（项目编号：19ZDA345）研究成果之一。

Research on the Construction of Evaluation Index System of Smart Library Development in Colleges

Duan Meizhen1,2, Chu Jingli3,4, Zhang Dongrong3,4, Zhang Ying3,4   

  1. 1 Information Research Center of Military Sciences, Academy of Military Sciences, Beijing 100142;
    2 Library of Academy of Military Sciences, Beijing 100039;
    3 National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190;
    4 Department of Library, Information and Archives Management, School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190
  • Received:2021-04-09 Online:2021-07-20 Published:2021-07-21

PDF

摘要： [目的/意义] 采用定量与定性相结合的方法，构建智慧图书馆建设评价指标体系，为开展智慧图书馆智慧化水平测度实践提供科学的评价标准和量化测评工具。[方法/过程] 基于文献调研与智慧图书馆面向对象分析，初步拟定指标体系；运用德尔菲方法，针对初步拟定的指标进行专家咨询，以确定最终的评价指标体系；利用层次分析法与专家调查法计算并确定评价指标权重；基于智慧图书馆建设评价体系，对智慧图书馆建设策略与智慧化运行进行分析。[结果/结论] 构建了由4个维度指标、12个一级指标、50个二级指标共同构成的智慧图书馆建设评价指标体系，从评价视角出发并提出智慧图书馆的智慧表征与建设策略。

关键词: 智慧图书馆, 评价指标体系, 德尔菲法, 层次分析法

Abstract: [Purpose/significance] The evaluation index system of smart library development is constructed by combining quantitative and qualitative methods,which provides scientific standard and quantitative tool for the evaluation practice of smart library. [Method/process] Based on literature research and object-oriented analysis of smart library, the index system was preliminarily formulated. Then, aiming at the preliminary indicators,Delphi method was used tocarry out expert consultation, andthe final evaluation index systemwas determined. Meanwhile, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and expert survey were used to calculate and determine the weight of evaluation indexes.Finally,based on the evaluation index system,the development strategy and operation of smart library were analyzed. [Result/conclusion] The evaluation index system of smart library development was constructed, which consisted of 4 dimensions, 12 first-level indexes and 50 second-level indexes. Under the perspective of evaluation, the smart representation and developmentstrategy of smart library were provided.

Key words: smart library, evaluation index system, Delphi method, analytic hierarchy process(AHP)

中图分类号: