图书情报工作 ›› 2015, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (9): 127-135.DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2015.09.018

• 综述述评 • 上一篇    下一篇

国内外机构知识库评价研究进展与评述

张雅琪, 盛小平   

  1. 华南师范大学经济与管理学院 广州 510006
  • 收稿日期:2015-04-01 修回日期:2015-04-20 出版日期:2015-05-05 发布日期:2015-05-05
  • 作者简介:张雅琪(ORCID:0000-0002-7825-0830),硕士研究生,E-mail:232254972@qq.com;盛小平(ORCID:0000-0002-6341-6973),教授,博士.
  • 基金资助:

    本文系华南师范大学研究生科研创新基金资助项目"机构知识库评价研究"(项目编号:2014ssxm65)研究成果之一.

Research Progress and Review on the Institutional Repository Evaluation

Zhang Yaqi, Sheng Xiaoping   

  1. School of Economic and Management, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006
  • Received:2015-04-01 Revised:2015-04-20 Online:2015-05-05 Published:2015-05-05

摘要:

[目的/意义]机构知识库评价研究意义重大,通过对国内外机构知识库评价研究实践的总结和分析,揭示当前机构知识库评价研究进展,为进一步研究提供方向.[方法/过程]基于文献分析,从评价内容、评价指标、评价方法三方面进行机构知识库评价研究评述.其中,机构知识库评价内容主要包括系统软件、数字资源管理、机构成员态度、实践建设、影响因素、绩效评价等方面;评价指标主要包括8种类型;评价方法主要包括平衡记分卡法、焦点小组访谈法、链接分析法等.[结果/结论]目前机构知识库评价研究已取得显著进展,但在用户多元化评价、定量指标设置等方面仍有待进一步研究.

关键词: 机构知识库, 评价指标, 评价体系

Abstract:

[Purpose/significance] Institutional repository evaluation is of great significance. Through the summary and analysis of the practices on institutional repository evaluation at home and abroad, this paper reveals research progress on institutional repository evaluation and provides direction for the further research.[Method/process] This paper summarizes research progress on institutional repository evaluation from three aspects of evaluation contents, evaluation index, evaluation methods based on literature analysis. Evaluation contents of institutional repository consist of system software, digital resource management, attitude of institutional members, practice and development, influencing factors and performance evaluation. Evaluation indexes of institutional repository consist of eight types. Evaluation methods of institutional repositories consist of methods of balanced scorecard, focus group interview and link analysis.[Result/conclusion] The practices on institutional repository evaluation have made significant progress so far, however it still needs to improve.

Key words: institutional repository, evaluation index, evaluation system

中图分类号: