图书情报工作 ›› 2018, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (17): 75-83.DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2018.17.010

• 情报研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

一种基于研究主题对比的单篇学术论文创新力评价方法

杨京1, 王芳1, 白如江2   

  1. 1. 南开大学商学院信息资源管理系 天津 300071;
    2. 山东理工大学图书馆 淄博 255049
  • 收稿日期:2018-01-03 修回日期:2018-05-28 出版日期:2018-09-05 发布日期:2018-09-05
  • 作者简介:杨京(ORCID:0000-0001-6782-8230),博士研究生,E-mail:yangjingnk@126.com;王芳(ORCID:0000-0002-2655-9975),教授,博士生导师;白如江(ORCID:0000-0003-3822-8484),副研究馆员,博士。
  • 基金资助:
    本文系国家社会科学基金重大项目"我国网络社会治理研究"(项目编号:14ZDA063)研究成果之一。

A Method to Evaluate Academic Papers' Innovation Based on the Research Theme Comparing

Yang Jing1, Wang Fang1, Bai Rujiang2   

  1. 1. Department of Information Resources Management, Business School, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071;
    2. Library, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255049
  • Received:2018-01-03 Revised:2018-05-28 Online:2018-09-05 Published:2018-09-05

摘要: [目的/意义] 创新是学术论文的本质要求,如何有效评价学术论文的创新力一直以来备受国内外专家和学者关注。随着信息技术的发展,利用计算机技术从论文内容角度对单篇学术论文的创新力进行评价逐步成为可能。[方法/过程] 提出一种基于研究主题对比的单篇学术论文创新力评价方法。该方法首先利用Keygraph算法提取代表论文研究主题的关键词,然后,将论文的研究主题与科学研究前沿主题进行相似度计算,最后,结合期刊影响因子和Altmetrics两项外在指标提出一种论文创新力综合评价模型。[结果/结论] 通过对"碳纳米管"材料研究领域的实证研究证明,该方法能够有效、迅速和准确地从论文内容角度对单篇学术论文的创新力进行评价。

关键词: 学术论文, 创新力, 研究主题, 期刊声望, 替代计量学

Abstract: [Purpose/significance] Innovation is the essence requirement of academic papers, and how to effectively evaluate the innovation of academic papers has been concerned about by domestic and foreign experts and scholars. The development of information technology makes it possible to automatically evaluate papers' innovation based on the content using computers. [Method/process] This paper presents a method to evaluate papers' innovation based on the research theme comparing. Firstly, keygraph algorithms is used to extract keywords which represent papers' theme.Then, the similarity of the research theme and the scientific research front theme is calculated.Lastly, a comprehensive model is presented to determine the level of papers' innovation bytwo external indicators includingthe journal impact factor and altmetrics. [Result/conclusion] An empirical study of carbon nanotube field demonstrated thatthis method can evaluate papers' innovation from the perspective of papers' contents effectively, quickly and accurately.

Key words: academic paper, innovation, research theme, journal reputation, altmetrics

中图分类号: