图书情报工作 ›› 2019, Vol. 63 ›› Issue (12): 12-21.DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2019.12.002

• 理论研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

中美医学信息学本硕教育现状对比分析与启示

张雪1,2, 张志强1,2, 陈秀娟1,2   

  1. 1. 中国科学院成都文献情报中心 成都 610041;
    2. 中国科学院大学经济与管理学院图书情报与档案管理系 北京 100190
  • 收稿日期:2018-11-14 修回日期:2019-02-07 出版日期:2019-06-20 发布日期:2019-06-20
  • 通讯作者: 张志强(ORCID:0000-0001-7323-501X),主任,研究员,博士生导师,通讯作者,E-mail:zhangzq@clas.ac.cn。
  • 作者简介:张雪(ORCID:0000-0003-3329-8977),博生研究生;陈秀娟(ORCID:0000-0002-8063-7647),博士研究生。
  • 基金资助:
    本文系国家社会科学基金重点项目"面向领域知识发现的学科信息学理论与应用研究"(项目编号:17ATQ008)和中国科学院信息化专项课题"面向干细胞领域知识发现的科研信息化应用"(项目编号:XXH13506-203)研究成果之一。

Comparative Research and Enlightenment of the Current Situation of Chinese and American Medical Informatics Education

Zhang Xue1,2, Zhang Zhiqiang1,2, Chen Xiujuan1,2   

  1. 1. Chengdu Library and Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041;
    2. Department of Library, Information and Archives Management, School of economics and management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190
  • Received:2018-11-14 Revised:2019-02-07 Online:2019-06-20 Published:2019-06-20

摘要: [目的/意义]对比分析中美高校医学信息学本科、硕士教育概况,为我国未来医学信息学教育提供参考和借鉴。[方法/过程]以院校开设时间、院校层次为筛选标准,从中美开展医学信息学教育的高校中各选取10所代表性高校为研究对象,通过网络调研,从基本要求、课程设置、师资力量、教育教学方式、就业前景等方面对中美医学信息学本科、硕士教育概况进行综合分析。[结果/结论]我国医学信息学本硕教育虽经历几十年的探索和实践并取得一定成就,但与美国相比,我国还存在一些不足,如在入学基本要求方面,注重本科教育,高层次人才培养体系不完善;在课程设置方面,课程内容设置单调,非医学基础课程占比过高,学科交叉融合不明显;在师资力量方面,教师学科背景单一,职称结构分布不平衡;在教育教学方式方面,教师教学方式简单,学生实践机会较少;在就业前景方面,学生知识体系不系统,就业前景局限。未来我国应顺应大数据科学研究范式发展要求,加快培养高层次医学信息学人才;改善课程体系和内容设置,拓宽学科知识体系;优化师资力量配置,吸引多学科背景人才;丰富培养方式,注重理论与实践相结合。

关键词: 医学信息学, 本科教育, 硕士教育, 比较研究

Abstract: [Purpose/significance] The paper compared and analyzed the undergraduate and master education in Chinese and American universities to provide reference for future medical informatics education in China.[Method/process] Taking the opening time and college level as the selection criteria, 10 representative universities from China and the United States were selected as the research objects. Through online research, the paper comprehensively analyzed the general situation of medical informatics education in China and the United States from the aspects of basic requirements, curriculum, teacher strength, teaching methods and employment prospects.[Result/conclusion] Although China has made some achievements in medical informatics education after decades of exploration and practice, compared with the United States, China still has some shortcomings. In terms of basic requirements for admission, China mainly concentrates on the undergraduate education so that the high-level personnel training system is imperfect; in terms of curriculum, the content of courses is monotonous and the proportion of non-medical basic courses is too high, and the interdisciplinary integration is not obvious; in terms of teachers' strength, the teacher's subject background is single and the distribution of teachers' professional titles is unbalanced; in terms of education and teaching methods, the teaching methods are simple and there are fewer practical opportunities for students; in terms of employment prospects, students knowledge system is not systematic and the employment prospects are limited. Therefore, China should conform to the development requirements of the big data science research paradigm, speed up the cultivation of high-level medical informatics; improve the curriculum and content settings, broaden the scope of subject knowledge system; optimize the allocation of teachers to attract multi-disciplinary background talents; enrich training methods, and pay attention to the combination of theory and practice.

Key words: medical informatics, undergraduate education, master's education, comparative study

中图分类号: