[1] 邱均平, 文庭孝. 评价学:理论·方法·实践[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2010:23.
[2] HAUSTEIN S, PETERS I, BAR-ILAN J, et al. Coverage and adoption of altmetrics sources in the bibliometric community[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 101(2):1145-1163.
[3] ORTEGA J L. Relationship between altmetric and bibliometric indicators across academic social sites:the case of CSIC's members[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2015, 9(1):39-49.
[4] ZAHEDI Z, COSTAS R, WOUTERS P. Assessing the impact of publications saved by mendeley users:is there any different pattern among users?[C]//International association of technological university libraries. West Lafayette:Purdue e-pubs, 2014.
[5] 王文娟, 马建霞, 陈春, 等. 引文文本分类与实现方法研究综述[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016, 60(6):118-127.
[6] PERITZ B C. A classification of citation roles for the social sciences and related fields[J]. Scientometrics, 1983, 5(5):303-312.
[7] TEUFEL S, SIDDHARTHAN A, TIDHAR D. Automatic classification of citation function[C]//Proceedings of the 2006 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing.Stroudsburg:Association for Computational Linguistics, 2006:103-110.
[8] BILDER G, FENNER M, LIN J, et al. ALM workshop 2014 report[EB/OL].[2019-01-19]. https://figshare.com/articles/ALM_Workshop_2014_Report/1287503.
[9] COSTAS R, DE RIJCKE S, MARRES N. Beyond the dependencies of altmetrics:conceptualizing ‘heterogeneous couplings’ between social media and science[EB/OL].[2019-01-19]. http://altmetrics.org/altmetrics17.
[10] SUGIMOTO C R. Theories of informetrics:a festschrift in honor of blaise cronin[M]//HAUSTEIN S, BOWMAN T D, COSTAS R. Interpreting" altmetrics":viewing acts on social media through the lens of citation and social theories. Berlin:De Gruyter, 2016:372-405.
[11] HAUSTEIN S. Grand challenges in altmetrics:heterogeneity, data quality and dependencies[J]. Scientometrics, 2016, 108(1):413-423.
[12] THELWALL M, TSOU A, WEINGART S, et al. Tweeting links to academic articles[J]. Cybermetrics:international journal of scientometrics, informetrics and bibliometrics, 2013, 17(1):1-8.
[13] BORNMANN L, HAUNSCHILD R. Which people use which scientific papers? An evaluation of data from F1000 and Mendeley[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2015, 9(3):477-487.
[14] 刘晓娟,余梦霞.Altmetrics覆盖率影响因素及应用分析[J].图书情报工作,2018,62(16):92-101.
[15] 刘丽敏,王晴.Altmetrics应用于影响力评价可行吗?——国外学者的实证研究及相关论争[J].情报理论与实践,2016,39(6):7-14.
[16] The event ontology[EB/OL].[2019-01-19].http://motools.sourceforge.net/event/event.html.
[17] MOHAMMADI E, THELWALL M, KOUSHA K. Can Mendeley bookmarks reflect readership? A survey of user motivations[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2016, 67(5):1198-1209.
[18] JIANG J, NI C, HE D, et al. Mendeley group as a new source of interdisciplinarity study:how do disciplines interact on Mendeley?[C]//Proceedings of the 13th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on digital libraries. New York:ACM, 2013:135-138.
[19] National information standards organization. NISO RP-25-2016 outputs of the NISO alternative assessment metrics project.[EB/OL].[2019-01-19]. https://www.niso.org/publications/rp-25-2016-altmetrics.
[20] SHEMA H, BAR-ILAN J, THELWALL M. How is research blogged? A content analysis approach[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2015, 66(6):1136-1149.
[21] BOYD D, GOLDER S, LOTAN G. Tweet, tweet, retweet:conversational aspects of retweeting on twitter[C]//201043rd Hawaii international conference on system sciences. Piscataway:IEEE, 2010:1-10.
[22] SCHNITZLER K, DAVIES N, ROSS F, et al. Using Twitter? to drive research impact:a discussion of strategies, opportunities and challenges[J]. International journal of nursing studies, 2016, 59(7):15-26.
[23] POWER A. Twitter's potential to enhance professional networking.[J]. British journal of midwifery, 2015, 23(1):65-67.
[24] MOLLETT A, MORAN D, DUNLEAVY P. Using Twitter in university research, teaching and impact activities[EB/OL].[2019-01-19]. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/38489. |