图书情报工作 ›› 2021, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (2): 117-125.DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2021.02.012

• 知识组织 • 上一篇    下一篇

专利无效对比文件判定方法研究

郭诗琪1,2, 贠强2, 陈亮2, 周杰2   

  1. 1. 中国医学科学院医学信息研究所 北京 100020;
    2. 中国科学技术信息研究所 北京 100038
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-10 修回日期:2020-10-12 出版日期:2021-01-20 发布日期:2021-01-20
  • 通讯作者: 周杰(ORCID:0000-0003-0147-8674),通讯作者,信息资源中心副主任,研究馆员,硕士生导师
  • 作者简介:郭诗琪(ORCID:0000-0002-9311-8088),硕士研究生;贠强(ORCID:0000-0002-9156-6063),副研究员,博士,硕士生导师,E-mail:yunq@istic.ac.cn;陈亮(ORCID:0000-0002-3235-9806),副研究员,博士,硕士生导师。
  • 基金资助:
    本文系国家重点研发计划项目课题“知识产权信息智能采集及深加工技术研究与应用示范”(项目编号:2017YFB1401902)和中信所重点工作“重点科技领域前沿跟踪与深度研究”(项目编号:ZD2020-02)研究成果之一。

Research on the Method of Judging Reference Document in Patent Invalidation Using GBDT

Guo Shiqi1,2, Yun Qiang2, Chen Liang2, Zhou Jie2   

  1. 1. Institute of Medical Information/Medical Lirary CAMS&PUMC, Beijing 100020;
    2. Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China, Beijing 100038
  • Received:2020-03-10 Revised:2020-10-12 Online:2021-01-20 Published:2021-01-20
  • Supported by:
     

摘要: [目的/意义] 对比文件是用以判断专利能否授权或无效的重要文件,针对传统信息检索方法的不足且鲜有利用机器学习方法研究对比文件检索的问题,在引入对比文件信息的基础上,构建专利相关性判定模型。[方法/过程] 以专利无效判决书中的目标专利与对比文件为数据集进行实验,提取文本相似度、共现词汇和共词数量特征信息,利用GBDT模型将对比文件的检索问题转化为判断其是否相关的分类问题。[结果/结论] 研究结果表明,不同字段数据对分类效果的贡献不同,其中说明书字段的准确率、召回率和F1值分别为79%、48%和59%,并且多特征集成后的分类效果显著优于单一文本相似度的结果,最后对实验错分情况进行分析,指出本研究下一步的研究方向。

 

关键词: 专利无效宣告, 对比文件, 特征选择, 机器学习

Abstract: [Purpose/significance] Comparative documents are important for judging whether a patent can be granted or invalid. Aiming at the shortcomings of traditional information retrieval methods and rarely using machine learning methods to study the issue of comparative document retrieval, based on the introduction of comparative file information, this paper constructs a patent relevance determination model.[Method/process] Experiments were performed by using the target patents and comparative documents in the patent invalidation judgment as the data set to extract text similarity, co-occurrence vocabulary, and co-word quantity feature information. The GBDT model was used to convert the retrieval of comparative documents into classification issues that determined whether they were relevant.[Result/conclusion] The research results show that the contribution of different field data to the classification effect is different, in which the F1 of the description text reaches 59%, and the classification effect after multi-feature integration is significantly better than the result of single text similarity. Finally, this paper analyzes the experimental misclassifications and points out the next research directions.

Key words: patent invalidity, the prior art, feature selection, machine learning

中图分类号: