社交媒体中突发公共卫生事件网络辟谣信息主体研究

doi:10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2021.19.002

图书情报工作 ›› 2021, Vol. 65 ›› Issue (19): 16-25.DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2021.19.002

所属专题：突发公共卫生事件中网络谣言治理及个人信息保护研究

• 专题：突发公共卫生事件中网络谣言治理及个人信息保护研究 • 上一篇下一篇

社交媒体中突发公共卫生事件网络辟谣信息主体研究

贾若男¹, 王晰巍^1,2,3, 孙玉姣¹

1 吉林大学管理学院长春 130022;
2 吉林大学大数据管理研究中心长春 130022;
3 吉林大学国家发展与安全研究院网络空间治理研究中心长春 130022

收稿日期:2021-04-12 修回日期:2021-08-05 出版日期:2021-10-05 发布日期:2021-10-09
通讯作者: 王晰巍(ORCID:0000-0002-5850-0126),主任,教授,博士生导师,通讯作者,E-mail:wxw_mail@163.com
作者简介:贾若男(ORCID:0000-0002-4262-7982),博士研究生;孙玉姣(ORCID:0000-0001-7265-8969),本科生。
基金资助:
本文系国家社会科学基金重大项目"大数据驱动的社交网络舆情主题图谱构建及调控策略研究"（项目编号：18ZDA310）研究成果之一。

Research on the Subject of Information to Refute Rumors of Public Health Emergencies in Social Media

Jia Ruonan¹, Wang Xiwei^1,2,3, Sun Yujiao¹

1 School of Management, Jilin University, Changchun 130022;
2 Research Center for Big Data Management, Jilin University, Changchun 130022;
3 Cyberspace Governance Research Center, National Academy of Development and Security, Jilin University, Changchun 130022

Received:2021-04-12 Revised:2021-08-05 Online:2021-10-05 Published:2021-10-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要： [目的/意义] 从多角度分析网络辟谣信息主体的类型、相互关系、社区结构和辟谣信息传播效果，有助于发现关键的辟谣信息主体和有效的网络辟谣信息扩散模式，对于加强突发公共卫生事件期间的舆情引导及维护社会稳定具有重要作用。[方法/过程] 选取新冠肺炎疫情期间"双黄连"辟谣事件，通过Neo4j构建辟谣主体关系网络，利用Louvain社区发现算法划分网络社区；通过内容分析和回归分析对网络辟谣信息主体的内容特征和辟谣策略进行比较和分析，并构建"主体-内容"二模网络，以分析不同信息主体和网络社区如何推动社交媒体中的辟谣信息传播以及行之有效的辟谣方式和辟谣策略。[结果/结论] 研究结果发现，政府和大众媒体是网络辟谣中的主要行为者。政府最普遍使用反驳谣言的策略，大众媒体则与之相反。内容特征对辟谣信息传播效果具有不同的影响。

关键词: 社交媒体, 突发公共卫生事件, 网络辟谣, 信息主体

Abstract: [Purpose/significance] Analyzing the types, mutual relationships, community structure, and dissemination effects of the information on the Internet from multiple angles will help to discover the key information subjects and the effective spread of the information on the Internet. It plays an important role in strengthening the guidance of public opinion during public health emergencies and maintaining social stability.[Method/process] The article selected the "Shuanghuanglian" rumors during the new crown pneumonia epidemic, and built a network of rumor-defying subjects through Neo4j, then detected the network community using Louvain algorithm. Through content analysis and regression analysis, this paper analyzed the characteristics of the information content and the strategies of the rumor-defying subjects, and constructed the subject-content two-mode network, to explore how different information subjects and communities promote the dissemination of rumor-refuting information in social media, as well as effective methods and strategies for rumor-refuting.[Result/conclusion] The results of the study found that the government and mass media were the main actors in online rumor-refuting. The government most used the strategy of countering rumors, while the mass media did the opposite. Content characteristics have different effects on the effectiveness of rumor-refuting information dissemination.

Key words: social media, public health emergency, rumor-refuting, subject of information

中图分类号:

TP391

贾若男, 王晰巍, 孙玉姣. 社交媒体中突发公共卫生事件网络辟谣信息主体研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(19): 16-25.

Jia Ruonan, Wang Xiwei, Sun Yujiao. Research on the Subject of Information to Refute Rumors of Public Health Emergencies in Social Media[J]. Library and Information Service, 2021, 65(19): 16-25.

参考文献

[1] 人民网. 《2019年网络谣言治理报告》揭秘三大谣言高发领域[EB/OL].[2020-08-06].http://society.people.com.cn/n1/2019/1226/c1008-31524533.html.
[2] 童文胜,易柏慧.网络辟谣:国内研究进展与理论分析框架[J].情报杂志,2020,39(6):128-134,202.
[3] YANG J, LEE S. Framing the MERS information crisis:an analysis on online news media's rumour coverage[J]. Journal of contingencies and crisis management, 2020(4):1-13.
[4] PULIDO C M, RUIZ-EUGENIO L, REDONDO-SAMA G, et al. A new application of social impact in social media for overcoming fake news in health[J]. International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020, 17(7):2430-2445.
[5] HYE-JIN PAEK, HOVE T. Mediating and moderating roles of trust in government in effective risk rumor management:a test case of radiation-contaminated seafood in South Korea[J]. Risk analysis, 2019, 39(12):2653-2667.
[6] AHSAN M, KUMARI M, SHARMA T P, et al. Rumors detection, verification and controlling mechanisms in online social networks:a survey[J]. Online social networks and media, 2019, 14:100050.
[7] HAGEN L, KELLER T, NEELY S, et al. Crisis communications in the age of social media:a network analysis of Zika-related Tweets[J]. Social science computer review, 2018, 36(5):523-541.
[8] CONRADO S P, NEVILLE K, WOODWORTH S, et al. Managing social media uncertainty to support the decision making process during emergencies[J]. Journal of decision systems, 2016, 25(S1):171-181.
[9] WASZAK P M, KASPRZYCKAWASZAK W, KUBANEK A, et al. The spread of medical fake news in social media-the pilot quantitative study[J]. Health policy and technology, 2018, 7(2):115-118.
[10] MCKEE M, VAN SCHALKWYK M C, STUCKLER D, et al. The second information revolution:digitalization brings opportunities and concerns for public health[J]. European journal of public health, 2019, 29(S3):3-6.
[11] PAL A, CHUA A Y K, GOH H L. How do users respond to online rumor rebuttals?[J]. Computers in human behavior, 2019, 106:106243.
[12] AHMED, WASIM, et al. COVID-19 and the 5G conspiracy theory:social network analysis of Twitter data[J]. Journal of medical Internet research, 2020, 22(5):e19458.
[13] WANG S, LI Z, WANG Y, et al. Machine learning methods to predict social media disaster rumor refuters[J]. International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019,16(8):1452-1468.
[14] 宗乾进,黄子风.社交媒体辟谣信息的扩散机理研究——基于辟谣信息演化网络的纵向分析[J].现代情报,2017,37(9):44-52,121.
[15] 马超.健康议题辟谣社群的类别构成与社群结构研究——基于多主体谣言协同治理的视角[J].情报杂志,2019,38(1):96-105.
[16] 刘嘉琪,齐佳音.公共危机背景下的道德判断与谣言对抗行为生成路径研究——基于不同社交媒体平台的定性比较分析[J].情报杂志,2019,38(1):87-95,105.
[17] MEADOWS C Z, TANG L, LIU W. Twitter message types, health beliefs, and vaccine attitudes during the 2015 measles outbreak in California[J]. American journal of infection control, 2019, 47(11):1314-1318.
[18] NEWMAN M E. Modularity and community structure in networks[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006, 103(23):8577-8582.
[19] 张海涛,周红磊,张鑫蕊,等.在线社交网络的社区发现研究进展[J].图书情报工作,2020,64(9):142-152.
[20] BARBERA P. Birds of the same feather Tweet together:bayesian ideal point estimation using Twitter data[J]. Political analysis, 2015, 23(1):76-91.
[21] 张海涛,刘雅姝,张枭慧,等.基于模块度的话题发现及网民情感波动研究——以新浪微博"中美间贸易摩擦"话题为例[J].图书情报工作,2019,63(4):6-14.
[22] TANG L, WANG X, LIU H, et al. Community detection via heterogeneous interaction analysis[J]. Data mining and knowledge discovery, 2012, 25(1):1-33.
[23] ZHANG Z, LUO T. Network capital, exploitative and exploratory innovations——from the perspective of network dynamics[J]. Technological forecasting and social change, 2020, 152:119910.
[24] SON J, LEE H K, JIN S, et al. Content features of Tweets for effective communication during disasters:a media synchronicity theory perspective[J]. International journal of information management, 2019, 45:56-68.
[25] 张廷玉.模因视角下自媒体谣言的传播机制研究——以"双黄连"事件为例[J].视听,2020(7):140-141.
[26] 新浪微博. #双黄连#[EB/OL].[2020-09-01]. https://s.weibo.com/topic?q=%E5%8F%8C%E9%BB%84%E8%BF%9E&pagetype=topic&topic=1&Refer=weibo_topic.
[27] 新浪微博. 微博2020年第一季度财报[EB/OL].[2020-09-01].https://hd.weibo.com/article/view/403.
[28] LI Y, ZHANG Y. Research on the simulation and coping strategies of the network public resonance phenomenon in colleges and universities[J]. Journal of information, 2019,38(12):107-113.
[29] LI S, LIU Z, LI Y, et al. Temporal and spatial evolution of online public sentiment on emergencies[J]. Information processing and management, 2020, 57(2):102177.
[30] HOU J, YU T, XIAO R. Structure reversal of online public opinion for the heterogeneous health concerns under NIMBY conflict environmental mass events in China[J]. Healthcare, 2020, 8(3):324-345.
[31] 王晰巍, 张柳, 韦雅楠,等. 社交网络舆情中意见领袖主题图谱构建及关系路径研究——基于网络谣言话题的分析[J]. 情报资料工作, 2020, 41(2):47-55.
[32] LI Z, ZHANG Q, DU X, et al. Social media rumor refutation effectiveness:evaluation, modelling and enhancement[J]. Information processing & management, 2021, 58(1):102420.
[33] RAO Q, ZHANG Z, LV Y, et al. Factors associated with influential health-promoting messages on social media:content analysis of Sina Weibo[J]. JMIR medical informatics, 2020, 8(10):e20558.
[34] FAN C, JIANG Y, YANG Y, et al. Crowd or hubs:information diffusion patterns in online social networks in disasters[J]. International journal of disaster risk reduction, 2020, 46:101498.
[35] GOEL S, WATTS D J, GOLDSTEIN D G. The structure of online diffusion networks[C]//Proceedings of the 13th ACM conference on electronic commerce. New York:ACM, 2012:623-638.
[36] MA Z, SUN A, CONG G, et al. On predicting the popularity of newly emerging hashtags in Twitter[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2013, 64(7):1399-1410.

社交媒体中突发公共卫生事件网络辟谣信息主体研究

Research on the Subject of Information to Refute Rumors of Public Health Emergencies in Social Media

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	李露琪, 侯丽, 邓胜利. 突发公共卫生事件网络虚假信息传播行为影响因素研究——以新冠疫情期间微博虚假信息为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(9): 4-13.
[2]	孙悦, 黄微. 社交媒体平台用户参与的行为谱与行为层级模型构建[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(9): 40-52.
[3]	李嘉兴, 王雷, 宋士杰, 朱庆华. 重大突发公共卫生事件驱动的医疗数据开放治理模式研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(4): 23-32.
[4]	彭丽徽, 蒋欣. 风险认知视域下社交媒体用户健康信息规避行为生成机理研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(22): 55-65.
[5]	周涛, 谢莹莹, 邓胜利. 社交媒体用户信息规避意图研究:C-A-C视角[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(21): 78-86.
[6]	李蕾, 王傲, 王卫, 黄崑. 突发公共卫生事件下中外信息需求对比研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(16): 105-116.
[7]	范春竹, 邓小昭, 韩毅. 社交媒体用户消极使用行为：多源数据融合视角[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(15): 76-85.
[8]	雷嫒, 钱楚涵, 李刚. CSSCI来源期刊微信公众号跨平台学术传播全样本实证分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2022, 66(14): 67-76.
[9]	张帅. 社交媒体虚假健康信息特征识别[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(9): 70-78.
[10]	张艳丰, 刘亚丽, 邹凯. 突发公共卫生事件社交媒体用户健康信息焦虑影响因素识别研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(8): 65-73.
[11]	李华强, 赵宇. 突发公共卫生事件中健康码信息资源的共享机制研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(6): 4-11.
[12]	陈静, 张璐, 陆泉. 突发公共卫生事件中大学生健康信息需求动因与主题研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(6): 82-92.
[13]	段秋婷, 谢兴政. 以小共同体本位为特征的社交媒体用户隐私保护意向形成机制[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(6): 118-128.
[14]	安璐, 陈苗苗, 李纲. 社交媒体环境下突发事件严重性评估和预警机制研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(5): 98-109.
[15]	张艳丰, 刘亚丽, 彭丽徽. 硬规则下移动社交媒体用户隐私政策阅读感知测度实证研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(4): 49-60.