领域演化结构识别的主路径方法与高被引论文方法对比研究
收稿日期: 2012-10-15
修回日期: 2012-12-24
网络出版日期: 2013-02-05
基金资助
本文系《图书情报工作》杂志社出版基金项目"基于引文网络主路径的领域演化结构识别研究"(项目编号:2012CB002)和西南大学科技基金资助项目"基于引文网络主路径的学科演化结构识别与演化动力学机制研究"(项目编号:SWU112001)研究成果之一。
Comparative Study of Main Path Analysis and Highly-cited-paper Clustering to Identify Domain Evolving Structure
Received date: 2012-10-15
Revised date: 2012-12-24
Online published: 2013-02-05
高被引论文方法通过节点相似性聚类来反映领域演化结构,而主路径方法则通过节点连通性来揭示领域演化结构。在分析两种方法差异的基础上,以富勒烯领域引文数据为样本,应用HistciteTM和Pajek对比研究主路径组分完全网络和相同数量顶点的高被引论文网络,结果表明二者的结构与组分差异显著。主路径组分的当年引用数排序的结果表明,多数路径组分不完全是当年的高被引论文,进而证明了主路径分析方法的独特性。
关键词： 主路径分析; 高被引论文聚类; 领域演化结构; HistCiteTM; Pajek
韩毅 , 童迎 , 夏慧 . 领域演化结构识别的主路径方法与高被引论文方法对比研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2013 , 57(03) : 11 -16 . DOI: 10.7536/j.issn.0252-3116.2013.03.002
Highly cited papers method is commonly used to reflect the domain evolving structure by calculating the node similarity, while the main path analysis reflects the domain evolving structure by calculating the node connectivity. Based on the differences between these two methods and taking fullerene citation data as the sample, this paper comparatively studies the complete network of main path component and highly-cited-paper network of same number vertex with Pajek and HistCiteTM. The result shows that the network structure and components are significantly different between of them. Furthermore, the cited counts of the main path node every year reveal that most path components are not completely the highly-cited papers and that the method of main path analysis is unique.
[1] Bjrk B-C. A model of scientific communication as a global distributed information system.. http://informationr.net/ir/12-2/p307.pdf.
[2] Goffman W. Mathematical approach to the spread of scientific ideas-The history of mast cell research[J].Nature,1966,212(5061):449-452.
[3] Jahn M.Changes with growth of the scientific literature of two biomedical specialties. Philadephia: Drexel University,1972.
[4] Small H.Nuclear physics in the physical review 1927-1940.Unpulished Report of a Study at the American Institute of Physics,1970.
[5] Hummon N, Doreian P. Connectivity in a citation network: The development of DNA theory[J]. Social Networks, 1989, 11(1): 39-63.
[6] Braam R R, Moed H F, van Raan A F J. Mapping of science by combined co-citation and word analysis. I: Structural aspects[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1991,42(4):233-251.
[7] Braam R R, Moed H F, van Raan A F J. Mapping of science by combined co-citation and word analysis. II: Dynamical aspects[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1991, 42(4):252-266.
[8] White H D. Pathfinder networks and author cocitation analysis: A remapping of paradigmatic information scientists[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2003, 54(5):423-434.
[9] Mapping execellence in economics.. http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/rtdinfo_en.html.
[10] National Institute of Science and Technology Policy(JAPAN). Science map 2004-Study on hot research areas(1999-2004) by bibliometric method.NISTEP,Report No.100(NISTEP,Report No.95 Follow-up), 2007.
[11] Carley K M, Hummon N, Harty M. Scientific influence: An analysis of the main path structure in the journal of conflict resolution[J]. Science Communication,1993,14(4):417-447.
[12] Verspagen B. Mapping technological trajectories as patent citation networks: A study on the history of fuel cell research..http://dimetic.dime-eu.org/dimetic_files/Lect%209%20to%20Verspagen%20-%20Verspangen.pdf.
[13] 杨中楷,刘佳.基于专利引文网络的技术轨道识别研究——以太阳能光伏电池板为例[J].科学学研究,2011,29(9):1311-1317.
[14] 董克,刘德洪,江洪,等.基于主路径分析的结果改进研究[J].情报理论与实践,2011,34(3):113-116.
[15] Garfield E, Pudovkin A I, Istomin V S. Algorithmic citation linked historiography:Mapping the literature of science//Proceedings of the 65th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science & Technology. Philadelphia:ASIST, 2002:14-24.
[16] Garfield E, Pudovkin A I, Istomin V S. Mapping the output of topical searches in the Web of Knowledge and the case of Watson-Crick[J]. Information Technology and Libraries, 2003,22(4):183-187.
[17] Garfield E, Pudovkin A I, Istomin V S. Why do we need algorithmic historiography?[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2003, 54(5):400-412.
[18] Batagelj V. Efficient algorithms for citation network analysis..http://www.google.com.hk/search?hl=zh-CN&source=hp&q=Effcient+Algorithm+for+Citation+Networks+Analysis&btnG=Google+%E6%90%9C%E7%B4%A2&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
