图书情报工作

图书情报工作 >

2013 >Issue 07: 89 - 95

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7536/j.issn.0252-3116.2013.07.016

情报研究

基于PLOS API的论文影响力选择性计量指标研究

  • 刘春丽
展开
  • 中国医科大学图书馆
刘春丽,中国医科大学图书馆馆员,硕士,E-mail:liuchunliliangxu@163.com。

收稿日期: 2012-12-10

  修回日期: 2013-03-15

  网络出版日期: 2013-04-05

收起

Study on the Altmetric Indicators of Paper Impact based on PLOS API

  • Liu Chunli
Expand
  • Library of China Medical University, Shenyang 110001

Received date: 2012-12-10

  Revised date: 2013-03-15

  Online published: 2013-04-05

Fold

摘要

以PLOS API平台提供的"论文层面计量"数据集为样本,对20个选择性计量指标进行标准化处理和正态性检验,提出选择性计量指标的适用广度和分布密度两个特征,通过Spearman相关分析方法得到非参数相关系数矩阵,利用R程序包Corrplot绘制系数矩阵的可视化颜色图,直观显示出选择性计量指标的相关程度;利用SPSS、Ucinet和NetDraw软件对选择性计量指标进行多维尺度和社会网络分析,得到的指标维度虽有细微差异,但基本呈现一致性。最后,总结选择性计量指标的主要作用、适用范围和难度。

关键词： 选择性计量指标; 论文层面计量; 学术影响力; 评价指标; 开放存取; 社交网络

本文引用格式

刘春丽 . 基于PLOS API的论文影响力选择性计量指标研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2013 , (07) : 89 -95 . DOI: 10.7536/j.issn.0252-3116.2013.07.016

Abstract

We take the dataset named "Article-Level Metrics" on PLOS API as the sample. Firstly, we implement standardization and normality test for twenty altmetric indicators. Secondly, we put forward two characteristics of altmetric indicators on coverage and density. Thirdly, through the Spearman correlation analysis, we get the nonparametric correlation coefficient matrix. Further, we visualize the correlation matrix by means of color graph generated by the "corrplot" package of R programming language. We adopt SPSS18.0, Ucinet 6 and NetDraw softwares to make multidimensional scaling and social network analysis, and the results are slightly different on the dimensions of altmetric indicators, but with the basic consistency. The author summarizes the role of altmetric indicators, their suitable scope and difficulty in the end.

Key words： altmetric indicator; article-level metrics; scholarly impact; evaluation indicators; Open Access; social network

参考文献

[1] Priem J, Taraborelli D, Groth P,et al. Altmetrics:A manifesto[EB/OL].[2012-08-25]. http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/.
[2] Neylon C, Wu S.Article-level metrics and the evolution of scientific impact[J]. PLOS Biology,2009,7(11): e1000242.
[3] Groth P, Gurney T.Studying scientific discourse on the Web using bibliometrics:A chemistry blogging case study[EB/OL].[2012-08-25].http://journal.webscience.org/308/2/websci10_submission_48.pdf.
[4] Priem J, Costello K. How and why scholars cite on Twitter[J].Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2010,47(1):1-4.
[5] Eysenbach G. Can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on Twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact[J].Journal of Medical Internet Research,2011(4):e123.
[6] Vaughan L, Shaw D.A new look at evidence of scholarly citation in citation indexes and from Web sources[J].Scientometrics,2008,74(2):317-330.
[7] Taraborelli D.Soft peer review: Social software and distributed scientific evaluation[EB/OL].[2012-08-25].http://eprints.ucl.ac.uk/8279.
[8] Priem J, Piwowar H, Hemminger B. Altmetrics in the wild: Using social media to explore scholarly impact [EB/OL].[2012-08-25]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1203.4745.
[9] 曹艺.面向学术影响力评价的网络学术交流中的文献的下载与引用研究[D].南京:南京理工大学,2012.
[10] 黄正南.中位数的统计推断[J].湖南医学,1988,5(1):43-45.
[11] 雷桂林,林文忠,郑伟强.统计分布中集中趋势指标间的关系[J].甘肃教育学院学报(自然科学版),1999,13(2):10-12.
[12] 魏太云.相关矩阵的可视化及其新方法探究[EB/OL].[2013-03-11].http://cos.name/2009/03/correlation-matrix-visualization/.
[13] 胡昌平,胡吉明,邓胜利.基于Web 2.0的用户群体交互分析及其服务拓展研究[J].中国图书馆学报,2009,35(9):99-106.
[14] 付鑫金,方曙.国外网络信息计量学研究的作者共被引分析[J].图书馆,2012(1):73-74,78.
[15] 刘淑芬.以社会网络分析法探讨BBS中的互动——对人民网"中日论坛"的个案研究[EB/OL].[2012-08-25].http://media.people.com.cn/GB/22114/150608/150619/10610064.html.
[16] 刘春丽.Web 2.0环境下的科学计量学:选择性计量学[J].图书情报工作,2012,56(14):52-56,92.

Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉