图书情报工作

图书情报工作 >

2013 , Vol. 57 >Issue 11: 26 - 31,64

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7536/j.issn.0252-3116.2013.11.004

理论研究

元分析方法与图书情报学

  • 李雪梅 ,
  • 曲建升
展开
  • 1. 中国科学院国家科学图书馆兰州分馆;
    2. 中国科学院大学
李雪梅,中国科学院大学、中国科学院国家科学图书馆兰州分馆硕士研究生;曲建升,中国科学院国家科学图书馆兰州分馆研究员,E-mail:jsqu@lzb.ac.cn。

收稿日期: 2013-03-11

  修回日期: 2013-05-18

  网络出版日期: 2013-06-05

基金资助

本文系中国科学院文献情报能力专项项目"网络科技信息自动监测系统二期建设"(项目编号:院1306)研究成果之一。

收起

Meta-analysis Method in Library and Information Science

  • Li Xuemei ,
  • Qu Jiansheng
Expand
  • 1. The Lanzhou Branch of the National Science Library/The Scientific Information Center for Resources and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000;
    2. Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190

Received date: 2013-03-11

  Revised date: 2013-05-18

  Online published: 2013-06-05

Fold

摘要

在介绍元分析方法来源的基础上,描述元分析方法的概念与内容,同时提炼元分析方法的特点——质量控制严谨、结论量化度高、结果验证严谨、适用范围广。最后,通过统计分析从LISTA、SCI、SSCI和CNKI中收集的相关文献资料,总结出元分析方法在图书情报学领域主要运用在科学计量、图书馆管理、信息管理、计算机辅助教育以及参考咨询等主题范围中,并据此提出元分析方法在图书情报领域的应用趋势。

关键词： 研究集成; 元分析; 图书情报学

本文引用格式

李雪梅 , 曲建升 . 元分析方法与图书情报学[J]. 图书情报工作, 2013 , 57(11) : 26 -31,64 . DOI: 10.7536/j.issn.0252-3116.2013.11.004

Abstract

Based on an introduction to the origin of meta-analysis method, the concepts and content of meta-analysis are elaborated. Meanwhile, this paper refines the features of meta-analysis method from four aspects of rigorous quality control, high conclusion quantify degree, strict results verification and broad scope of application. According to statistical analysis on relevant literatures collected from LISTA, SCI, SSCI and CNKI, it concludes that meta-analysis method in library and information science (LIS) is mainly used in the topics of scientometrics, library management, information management and computer-aided education as range. Finally, this paper puts forward its application trends in the field of LIS.

Key words： research synthesis; meta-analysis; library and information science

参考文献

[1] 孙华.论大科学时代的大学科研图景[J].高教探索,2010(1):19-23.
[2] Feldman K A.Using the work of others: Some observations on reviewing and integrating[J].Sociology of Education,1971,44(1):86-102.
[3] Light R J, Smith P V.Accumulating evidence: Procedures for resolving contradictions among different research studies[J].Harvard Educational Review,1971,47(4):429-471.
[4] Taveggia T C. Resolving research controversy through empirical cumulation toward reliable sociological knowledge[J].Sociological Methods & Research,1974, 2(4):395-405.
[5] Glass G V. Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research [J].Educational Resercher,1976,5(10):3-8.
[6] Hunter J E, Schmidt F L. Methods of meta-analysis [M]. Newbury Park: Sage, 1990.
[7] Fleiss J L,Gross A J.Meta-analysis in epidemiology, with special reference to studies of the association between exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and lung cancer: A critique[J].Journal of Clinical,1991, 44(2): 127-139.
[8] Borenstein M, Hedges L V, Higgins J P T, et al.Introduction to meta-analysis[M].Chichester: Wiley and Sons, Ltd,2009.
[9] Higgins J P, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0[EB/OL].[2013-03-05].http://www.cochrane.org/sites/default/files/uploads/handbook/Handbook510pdf_Ch08_RiskOfBias.pdf.
[10] Hedges L V, Olkin I. Statistical methods for meta-analysis[M]. New York: Academic Press, 1985.
[11] Gurevitch J, Curtis P S, Jones M H. Meta-analysis in ecology[M/OL].[2013-03-05].http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0065250401320135.
[12] Gurevitch J, Hedges L V. Meta-analysis: Combining the results of independent experiments[M]//Scheiner S M, Gurevitch J. Design and Analysis of Ecological Experiments. London: Chapman and Hall, 1993:378-425.
[13] Guilera G,Barrios M,Benito J G. Meta-analysis in psychology: A bibliometric study[J]. Scientometrics,2013,94(3):943-954.
[14] 钟丽萍,冷伏海. 基于综合集成论的情报研究理论阐释[J].情报理论与实践,2012,35(6):7-11.
[15] Michelle E K, Melissa C B. The systematic review and bibliometric network analysis (SeBriNA) is a new method to contextualize evidence. Part 1:Description[J]. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology,2012,65(9):1010-1015.
[16] Mogil J S, Simmonds K, Simmonds M J.Pain research from 1975 to 2007: A categorical and bibliometric meta-trend analysis of every research paper published in the journal, Pain[J].Pain,2009,142(1-2):48-58.
[17] Baker R, Jackson D. Using journal impact factors to correct for the publication bias of medical studies[J]. Biometrics, 2006, 62(3):785-792.
[18] Roblyer M D, Freeman J,Donaldson M B, et al. A comparison of outcomes of virtual school courses offered in synchronous and asynchronous formats[J].The Internet and Higher Education,2007,10(4):261-268.
[19] Zhang Li, Watson E M, Banfield L. The efficacy of computer-assisted instruction versus face-to-face instruction in academic libraries: A systematic review[J]. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 2007,33(4):478-484.
[20] Ankem K. Evaluation of method in systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in LIS [J]. Library & Information Research, 2008, 32(101):91-104.
[21] Liew C L. Digital library research 1997-2007: Organisational and people issues [J]. Journal of Documentation,2009, 65(2):245-266.
[22] 张晓林.数字化参考咨询服务[J].四川图书馆学报,2001(1):1-6.
[23] Saxton M L. Reference service evaluation and meta-analysis: Findings and methodological issues [J]. Library Quarterly, 1997, 67(3): 267-289.
[24] Matteson M L, Salamon J, Brewster L. A systematic review of research on live chat service[J].Reference & User Services Quarterly,2011,51(2):172-190.
[25] Julien C A, Leide J E, Boutheilier F. Controlled user evaluations of information visualization interfaces for text retrieval: Literature review and meta-analysis[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2008,59(6):1012-1024.

Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉