图书情报工作

图书情报工作 >

2013 , Vol. 57 >Issue 11: 96 - 99,119

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7536/j.issn.0252-3116.2013.11.018

情报研究

hi指数——一种对h指数进行迭代计算的个人学术影响力评价方法

  • 张学梅
展开
  • 苏州市职业大学图书馆
张学梅,苏州市职业大学图书馆馆员,硕士,E-mail:dewa29@sina.com。

收稿日期: 2013-03-15

  修回日期: 2013-04-25

  网络出版日期: 2013-06-05

收起

hi Index: An Individual Academic Impact Evaluation Method by Iteration Computation of h Index

  • Zhang Xuemei
Expand
  • Suzhou Vocational University Library, Suzhou 215104

Received date: 2013-03-15

  Revised date: 2013-04-25

  Online published: 2013-06-05

Fold

摘要

为克服h指数评价个人科研能力时有可能出现多人具有同一h指数,从而无法进行细分这一缺陷,对h指数进行一次修正,设计出一种功能更强大、使用范围更广泛的hi指数,介绍hi指数的定义、原理和方法,并使用hi指数对我国图书馆学、情报学领域部分作者进行评价以证实其效用。最后总结hi指数与其他几种形式相似的类h指数方法之异同,界定各自的适用范围,并指出hi指数的最大优点就是在整个评价过程中都贯彻发文量与被引量相结合的思想。

关键词： hi指数; h指数; 科学评价

本文引用格式

张学梅 . hi指数——一种对h指数进行迭代计算的个人学术影响力评价方法[J]. 图书情报工作, 2013 , 57(11) : 96 -99,119 . DOI: 10.7536/j.issn.0252-3116.2013.11.018

Abstract

To solve the problem in evaluating authors with h index that there will be a lot of authors with same credits and leads to senseless measurement, this paper designs a hi index which is more powerful and can be used in more wide-ranging. It elaborates the definition, principles, and method of hi index, and uses it to evaluate 175 authors of library and information science to verify its effect. Finally, the paper compares hi index with some other types of h index and defines their applied ranges. This paper indicates that the most advantage of hi index is that identificated and cited works play roles together throughout the whole evaluation.

Key words： hi index; h index; scientific evaluation

参考文献

[1] Kosmulski M. A new Hirsch-type index saves time and works equally well as the original h-index[J].ISSI Newsletter,2006,2(3):4-6.
[2] Egghe L. Theory and practice of the g-index[J].Scientometrics,2006,69(1):131-152.
[3] 金碧辉.科学家为自己设计了一项评价指标: h 指数[J]. 科学观察,2006,1(1):8-9.
[4] 金碧辉,Rousseau R. R 指数、AR 指数: h 指数功能扩展的补充指标[J].科学观察,2007,2(3):1-8.
[5] Alonso S, Cabrerizo F J, Herrera-Viedma E, et al. hg-index:A new index to characterize the scientific output of researchers based on the h-and g-indices[J].Scientometrics,2010,82(2):391-400.
[6] 聂超,魏泽峰.基于学术影响力差异h 指数改进的实证研究[J].情报杂志,2010,29(5):89-91.
[7]王凌峰.一个新的h-type指标——A+指数[J].情报杂志,2013,32(1):55-58.
[8] 张学梅.hm指数——对h指数的修正[J].图书情报工作,2007,51(10):116-118,16.
[9] 许新军.ha指数: 对h指数的修正——"金牌优先"法则的启示[J].情报理论与实践,2009,32(11):8-12.
[10] Giovanni A, Annarosa C. Two simple new bibliometric indexes to better evaluate research in disciplines where publications typically receive less citations[J]. Scientometrics,doi: 10.1007/s11192-013-0951-6.
[11] Hirsch J E. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2005,102(46):16569-16572.

Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉