指出2011年7月13日,《中华人民共和国著作权法》第三次修订启动,修订草案第26条规定了利用孤儿作品的强制许可制度。但是,草案针对孤儿作品利用程序缺乏操作性、数字化使用方式的单一性等诸多局限性限缩了强制许可制度的适用范围。探讨孤儿作品利用的法定许可制度正当性基础,并在立法技术上分析孤儿作品法定许可制度的可行性;在实体内容上构建孤儿作品法定许可制度的主体、客体和内容等框架,以期使得孤儿作品的利用模式——法定许可制度更具可操作性。
On July 13, 2011, the third amendment of the Copyright Law was launched and in the 26th article of the draft, orphan works were defined and handled and legal permission to public access to and digital preservation of orphan works were given to digital libraries. However, the draft has its limitations due to two factors, namely, single model of operation and thus poor operability. In this paper, the author discussed the theoretical foundation of the legal regulation, based on which, the author further analyzed the feasibility of legal procedures in an attempt to improve and perfect the draft. Finally, a framework on which the use of orphan works and the evaluation could be done was recommended.
[1] Kahle B, Prelinger R V. Ashcroft J, 2004 U.S. Dist. Lexis 24090.[EB/OL].[2013-01-05] http://www. liuc.it/ricerca/istitutoeconomia/LawEconomicsJuly2005/papers/khong_liucpaper.pdf.
[2] U.S. Copyright Office. Report on orphan works[EB/OL].[2013-03-05]http://www. copyright. gov/orphan/orphan-report-full.pdf.
[3] 马海群,高思静.孤儿作品版权困境及解决路径[J].图书情报工作,2011,55(17):87-91.
[4] 赵力.孤儿作品法理问题研究[J].河北法学,2012(5):149-154.
[5] 黄旭春.浅析美国2008年孤儿作品议案[J].电子知识产权,2009(7):30-33.
[6] 蹇瑞卿,于佳亮.探寻孤儿作品版权问题的解决之道[J].图书馆建设,2011(5):37-40.
[7] 金潞,刘青.推进孤儿作品公共获取的解决之道[J].图书情报工作,2010,54(5):14-17.
[8] 管育鹰.欧美孤儿作品问题解决方案的反思与比较[J].河北法学,2013(6):135-141.
[9] 冯晓青.知识产权法利益平衡理论[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2006:106.
[10] 中华人民共和国著作权法修改草案第三稿[EB/OL].[2013-04-15].http://wenku. baidu. Com/view/5f 6c 312e58fb770bf78a5528.html.
[11] 董皓,顾敏康.论著作权法中的孤儿作品问题[EB/OL].[2013-03-15].http://www.shucang.org/web/book/browse/vk/6.
[12] Green Paper.Copyright in the knowledge economy COM(2008)466/3[R/OL].[2013-04-15].http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/copyright/docs/copyright-infso/greenpaper_en.pdf.
[13] 金泳锋,彭婧.孤儿作品保护大陆与香港之比较研究[J].电子知识产权,2011(3):61-63.
[14] 胡良荣.知识产权法新论[M].北京:中国检察出版社,2006:105.
[15] 刘春田.著作权法三次修改是国情巨变的要求[J].知识产权,2012(5):7-12.
[16] Copyright Board of Canada.Decisions-Unlocatable Copyright Owners-Decision/Licences Issued to the Following Applicants,2010-7-14[EB/OL].[2013-04-15]. http://www. cb-cda. gc.ca/unlocatable-introuva bles/licences-e.html(2010-10-19).
[17] 加户守行.著作权逐条讲义[M].社团法人著作权情报センター,2006:414-415.
[18] 社团法人著作权情报センター(CRIC).文化审议著作权分科会报告书[EB/OL].[2013-04-22].http://www.cric.or.jp/houkoku/h18_1b/h18_1b.html.
[19] 翟建雄,邓茜.孤儿作品的数字化及利用:欧洲的立法与实践[EB/OL].[2013-03-05].http://www. chinacourt. org/article/detail/2013/01/id/813216.shtml.
[20] Yu P K. Protecting intellectual property in post-WTO China[J]. American University Law Review,2006(4):901-910.
[21] 李永明, 曹兴龙.中美著作权法定许可制度比较研究[J].浙江大学学报,2005(4):29-36.
[22] Westkamp G.The implementation of directive 2001/29/EC in the member states[M]. London:Queen Mary Intellectual Property Research Institute,2007:24.
[23] Data Protection-certain key issues.2013.Informal justice and home affairs ministers' meeting[EB/OL].[2013-05-05].http://edri.org/files/irl_dppaper.pdf.
[24] 日本著作权法[EB/OL].[2013-05-05].http://apps.lib.whu.edu.cn/skdh/xx/zcywj/020.htm.
