工作研究

图书馆电子资源评估的影响因素与案例分析

  • 周琼
展开
  • 上海外国语大学图书馆
周琼,上海外国语大学图书馆副研究馆员,博士,E-mail:sophieonline@163.com。

收稿日期: 2013-06-25

  修回日期: 2013-08-02

  网络出版日期: 2013-08-20

基金资助

本文系上海市教委科研创新项目"俄语特色电子资源库建设"(项目编号:12ZS060)和上海外国语大学重大科研项目"外语院校特色电子资源体系建设"(项目编号:2011114003)研究成果之一。

Influencing Factors and Case Studies on Library Electronic Resources Assessment

  • Zhou Qiong
Expand
  • Shanghai International Studies University Library, Shanghai 200083

Received date: 2013-06-25

  Revised date: 2013-08-02

  Online published: 2013-08-20

摘要

指出在以用户为中心的服务理念指引下,图书馆需要在引进电子资源前,对数据库进行严格且人性化的评估,各个高校根据不同的情况,评估时需要考虑各种因素。在美国图书馆界相关调查统计的基础上,总结出五大影响因素:学科分布和发展趋势、各层次的学生比例、各层次的研究力量分布、性别、使用时间和习惯,并用具体案例验证这些因素在影响数据库引进决定和引进时间点方面所起的作用。

本文引用格式

周琼 . 图书馆电子资源评估的影响因素与案例分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2013 , 57(16) : 56 -60 . DOI: 10.7536/j.issn.0252-3116.2013.16.011

Abstract

Under the guidance of the user-centered service philosophy, libraries need to assess the quality of databases in a rigorous and human-oriented way before the introduction of electronic resources. A variety of factors should be considered according to the diverse situations of various colleges and universities. On the basis of the relevant survey and statistics, this essay summarizes five factors, including distributions and development tendencies of subjects, the proportion of students at different levels, the research ability distribution of students at different levels, gender and the habits and the time for them to use databases. A number of specific cases are provided to verify the roles those factors play in the decision-making and point-in-time of introducing electronic resources.

参考文献

[1] Samson S,Derry S, Eggleston H. Networked resources, assessment and collection development[J]. The Journal of Academic Librarianship,2004,30 (6): 476-481.
[2] Rudner L M, Miller-Whitehead M, Gellman J S. Who is reading on-line education journals? Why? and what are they reading?[OL].[2013-08-01].http://www.dlib.org/dlib/december02/rudner/12rudner.html.
[3] King D, Montgomery C H. After migration to an electronic journal collection[J/OL].[2013-08-01].http://www.dlib.org/dlib/december02/king/12king.html.
[4] Tenner E, Zheng Y Y. End-user acceptance of electronic journals: A case study from a major academic research library[J]. Technical Services Quarterly,2000,17(2): 1-11.
[5] Mjid S, Abazov A F. Computer literacy and use of electronic information sources by academics: A case study of International Islamic University Malaysia[J]. Asian Libraries,1999,8(4):100-111.
[6] Finholt T A, Brooks J M. Collaboratory for research on electronic work. Analysis of JSTOR: The umpact on scholarly practice of access to on-line journal archives[EB/OL].[2013-07-21].http://eric.ed.gov/?q=Analysis+of+JSTOR+The+Impact +on+Scolarly+Practice+of+to+On-Line+Journal+Archives & id=ED414927.
[7] Monopoli M, Nicholas D,Georgiou P,et al. A User-oriented evaluation of digital libraries: Case study: The "electronic journals" service of the library and information service of the University of Patras, Greece[J]. Aslib Proceeding,2002,54(2):103-117.
[8] Mackie-Mason J K, Riveros J F,Maria S B,et al. A report on the PEAK experience:Usage and economic behavior[J/OL].[2013-08-01].http://dlib.org/dlib/july99/mackie-mason/07mackie-mason.html.
[9] Tenopir C, Read E. Patterns of database use in academic libraries[J]. College & Research Libraries,2000,61(3): 234-246.
[10] Dilevko J, Gottlieb L. Print sources in the electronic age: A vital part of the research process for undergraduate students[J]. The Journal of Academic Librarianship,2002,28(6): 381-392.
[11] 周健,余海宪.电子资源评估研究评述与展望[C]//黄秀文.传承 服务 创新:华东师范大学图书馆学术文存.北京:北京图书馆出版社, 2007:152-161.
文章导航

/

〈 〉