图书情报工作

图书情报工作 >

2013 , Vol. 57 >Issue 19: 30 - 36

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7536/j.issn.0252-3116.2013.19.004

专题：合作信息查寻与检索行为研究

合作信息查寻与检索相关性判据的探索性因子分析

  • 童迎 ,
  • 李鹏 ,
  • 夏慧
展开
  • 西南大学计算机与信息科学学院
童迎,西南大学计算机与信息科学学院硕士研究生,E-mail:tongying@swu.edu.cn;李鹏,西南大学计算机与信息科学学院硕士研究生;夏慧,西南大学计算机与信息科学学院硕士研究生。

收稿日期: 2013-08-30

  修回日期: 2013-09-18

  网络出版日期: 2013-10-05

基金资助

本文系国家社会科学基金项目“语境视角下合作信息查寻与检索的行为机制与相关性模型研究”(项目编号:12BTQ043)研究成果之一。

收起

Analysis on Exploratory Factor of Relevance Criteria in Collaborative Information Seeking & Retrieval

  • Tong Ying ,
  • Li Peng ,
  • Xia Hui
Expand
  • College of Computer and Information Science, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715

Received date: 2013-08-30

  Revised date: 2013-09-18

  Online published: 2013-10-05

Fold

摘要

基于案例研究结果及早期研究成果设计合作信息查寻与检索相关性的判据量表,通过问卷调查获取高校及科研院所学生合作信息查寻与检索的相关性判据使用数据,利用临界值比较、内部一致性分析、均值比较、探索性因子分析等方法对这些数据进行量化分析,得出以下主要结论:合作相关性判据量表的项目共34项,分属于8个类别,分别为信息来源特征、信息内容有用性、信息索引特征、信息表现形式、信息质量、可获取性、信息结构特征与信息传播特征;8个类别可解释的方差变异约为60%,表明相关性判据不是相关判断的唯一标准或依据,还有其他因素影响用户的相关判断过程。

关键词： 合作信息查寻与检索; 相关性; 相关性判据; 探索性因子分析

本文引用格式

童迎 , 李鹏 , 夏慧 . 合作信息查寻与检索相关性判据的探索性因子分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2013 , 57(19) : 30 -36 . DOI: 10.7536/j.issn.0252-3116.2013.19.004

Abstract

The relevance criteria scale about collaborative information seeking and retrieval is given based on the cases study and early research achievements. The data on relevance judgment about it are collected with the questionnaire, which are completed by students of university and institute. Some exploratory statistical techniques, such as critical value comparison, internal consistence comparison, means comparison, and factor analysis, are applied to carry out quantitative analysis. Composed of 34 items in the relevance criteria scale, eight conceptual catalogues of collaborative relevance criteria are identified, which are information source characteristics, information content usefulness, information index characteristics, information representation pattern, information quality, accessibility, information structure characteristics and information dissemination characteristics. But in terms of eight conceptual catalogues, probably 60% variation of variance can be interpreted, which means that the collaborative relevance criteria in the scale are not the sole basis to judge relevance and there are other factors to influence the collaborative relevance judgment.

Key words： collaborative information seeking &; retrieval; relevance; relevance criteria; exploratory factor analysis

参考文献

[1] Foster J.Collaborative information seeking and retrieval[J]. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 2006, 40: 329-356.
[2] 韩毅,李健,樊志伟,等.合作信息检索的演化发展及研究现状[J].情报科学,2009,27(9):1430-1435.
[3] 吴丹,邱瑾. 国外协同信息检索行为的研究综述[J].中国图书馆学报,2012,38(5):100-110.
[4] Baeza-Yates R, Ribeiro-Neto B.现代信息检索(影印版)[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2004:308.
[5] Barry C L.User-defined relevance criteria: An exploratory study[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science,1994,45 (3):149-159.
[6] Zhang X M.Collaborative relevance judgment:A group consensus method for evaluating user search performance[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2002,53(3):220-231.
[7] Wu I, Liu D.A collaborative relevance feedback approach to task-driven recommendation[EB/OL]. [2012-10-17]. http://www.pacis-net.org/file/2003/papers/e-business/265.pdf.
[8] Liu D, Wu I.Collaborative relevance assessment for task-based knowledge support[J].Decision Support Systems,2008,44(2):524-543.
[9] Foley C, Smeaton A F, Lee H.Synchronous collaborative information retrieval with relevance feedback[EB/OL]. [2012-10-17]. http://doras.dcu.ie/222/1/ieee_collab_com_2006.pdf.
[10] Foley C.Division of labor and sharing of knowledge for synchronous collaborative information retrieval[D]. Dublin:Dublin City University,2008.
[11] 徐树维.用户同步协作检索模型及其机制研究[D].北京:中国科学院文献情报中心,2010.
[12] González-Ibáñez R,Shah C.A proposal for measuring and implementing group's affective relevance in collaborative information seeking[EB/OL]. [2012-10-17]. http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/ryenw/hcir2010/docs/papers/gonz%C3%A1lez-ib%C3%A1%C3%B1ez_pp17.pdf.
[13] González-Ibáñez R.Group's Affective Relevance,Affective Feedback,and Emotional Awareness(Part 1)[EB/OL].[2011-12-21].http://collab.infoseeking.org/node/19.
[14] Cuadra C A, Katter R V. Opening the black box of 'relevance'[J]. Journal of Documentation, 1967, 23(4): 291-303.
[15] Nilan M S, Peek R P, Snyder H W. A methodology for tapping user evaluation behaviors: An exploration of users' strategy, source and information evaluating[C]//Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science. Maryland : Association for Information Science and Technology ,1988, 25:152-159.
[16] Park T K.The nature of relevance in information retrieval:An empirical study[J].Library Quarterly,1993,63(3): 318-351.
[17] Rees A M , Schultz D G. A field experimental approach to the study of relevance assessments in relation to document searching (2vols,NSF Contract No.C-423)[Z].Center for Documentation and Communication Research, School of Library Science, Case Western Reserve University, CleveIand,OH.1967.
[18] Cool C,Belkin N J,Kantor P B.Characteristics of texts affeceting relevance judgments[C]//Williams M E.Proceedings of the 14th National Online Meeting.editor Medford, NJ:Learned Information,Inc,1993:77-84.
[19] Tang R,Solomon P.Toward an understanding of dynamics of relevance judgment:An analysis of one person's search behavior[J].Information Processing & Management,1998,34(2/3):237-256.
[20] Savolainen R,Kari J.User-defined relevance criteria in Web searching[J].Journal of Documentation, 2006, 62(6): 685-707.
[21] Taylor A R,Cool C, Belkin N J,et, al.Relationships between categories of relevance criteria and stage in task completion[J].Information Processing and Management,2007,43(4):1071-1084.
[22] Wang P. A cognitive model of document selection of real users of information retrieval systems[D]. Washington D C: University of Maryland, College Park, 1994.
[23] Tombros A, Ruthven I, Jose J M. Searchers' criteria for assessing web page[OL]. [2012-10-17]. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.5.4158&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
[24] Yang Meng.An exploration of users' video relevance criteria[D].Chapel Hill:University of North Carolina,2005.
[25] Schamber L.User's criteria for evaluation in a multimedia information seeking and use situation[D].Syracuse University,1991.
[26] Barry C L.User-defined relevance criteria:An exploratory study[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science,1994,45(3):149-459.
[27] Eisenberg M, Barry C.Order effects:A study of the possible influences of presentation order on user judgment of document relevance[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science,1988,39(5):293-300.
[28] Kim S,Oh J S, Oh S. Best-answer selection criteria in a social Q&A site from the user-oriented relevance perspective[EB/OL]. [2012-10-17]. http://curric.dlib.vt.edu/papers/ASIST2007_0525_Yahoo_Answers_Final_version.pdf.
[29] Barnes M D.Measuring the relevance of evaluation criteria among health information seekers on the Internet[J].Journal of Health Psychology,2003,8(1):71-82.
[30] Burton V T,Chadwick S A.Investigating the practices of student researchers:Patterns of use and criteria for use of Internet and library sources[J].Computers and Composition,2000,17(3):309-328.
[31] Wu Ying-Tien,Tsai Chin-Chung. Information commitments:Evaluative standards and information searching strategies in Web-based learning environments[J].Journal of Computer Assisted learning,2005,21(3):374-385.
[32] 吴明隆.问卷统计分析实务:SPSS操作与应用[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2010.

Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉