收稿日期: 2013-11-23
修回日期: 2013-12-08
网络出版日期: 2014-01-05
基金资助
本文系国家社会科学基金项目“文献计量学视角下的NPE及其专利的计量与评价”（项目编号：13CTQ036）和杭州市哲学社会科学规划课题成果（项目编号：B13TD02Q）研究成果之一，并得到杭州电子科技大学“浙江省信息化与经济社会发展研究中心”资助。
Research on Knowledge Structure of Information Science Based on Author Bibliographic-coupling Analysis
Received date: 2013-11-23
Revised date: 2013-12-08
Online published: 2014-01-05
以SCI和SSCI收录的7种情报学期刊在2000-2010年间的数据为样本，以作者文献耦合分析方法为研究视角，探寻新世纪以来情报学的知识结构。研究探测到：①情报学领域的几位具有较强研究活力以及广泛影响力的学者，作者的发文数、耦合频次以及作者在耦合网络中的中心性都是有关系的，但这种相关关系表现得并不强。②情报学的7个主要研究主题——科学计量学、网络资源管理与配置、信息检索、信息系统、知识管理、用户交互与服务、科学评价中，其科学计量学和网络资源管理与配置是两个主流研究主题；各研究主题之间的融合还有待于进一步加强。③与作者文献共被引分析法不同，作者文献耦合分析法以当前活跃的作者为分析对象，它可以从另一个角度来探析情报学的知识结构状况。
宋艳辉 , 武夷山 . 基于作者文献耦合分析的情报学知识结构研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014 , 58(01) : 117 -123 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2014.01.017
Using author bibliographic-coupling analysis, this paper chooses the data of 7 information science journals indexed both in SCI and SSCI from 2000 to 2010 as the sample, and explores knowledge structure of Information Science during the new century. The research detects several scholars with strong vitality and broad influence, such as Thelwall, M、Leydesdorff, L、Cronin, B、White, HD、Meho, LI, etc.. Author posting content, coupling frequency, and the coupling network centrality are related, but the correlation is not strong. The paper explores the seven major research themes of Information Science: Scientometrics, network resource management and configuration, information retrieval, information system, knowledge management, user interaction and service, and scientific evaluation, among which, Scientometrics, network resource management and configuration are mainstream research fields. The research suggests that the integration between the research fields needs further reinforcement. Different from the author co-citation analysis, author bibliographic-coupling analysis makes currently active author as object, to explore the knowledge structure of information science from another perspective.
[1] Small H. Cocitation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1973, 24(4): 265-269.
[2] Marshakova S I. System of document connections based on references[J]. Nauch-Techn.Inform, 1973, 2 (6):3-8.
[3] White H D, Griffith B C. Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1981, 32(3):163-171.
[4] Pamela E S. Schlarly communication as a socioecological system[J].Scientometrics, 2001, 51(3): 573-605.
[5] White H D, McCain K W. Visualizing a discipline: An author cocitation analysis of information science, 1972-1995[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1998, 49, 327-355.
[6] Chen Chaomei. Visualizing semantic spaces and author co-citation networks in digital libraries[J]. Information Processing & Management, 1999, 35(3):401-420.
[7] Kessler M M. Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers[J]. American Documentation, 1963, 14(1):10-25.
[8] Zhao Dongzhi. Evolution of research activities and intellectual influences in information science 1996-2005: Introducing author bibliographic-coupling analysis[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2008, 59(13):2070-2080.
[9] 陈远, 王菲菲. 基于CSSCI的国内情报学领域的作者文献耦合分析[J].情报资料工作, 2011(5):5-12.
[10] 马瑞敏.基于作者学术关系的科学交流研究[D].武汉:武汉大学, 2009.
[11] 马瑞敏, 倪超群. 作者耦合分析: 一种新学科知识结构发现方法的探索性研究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2012, 38(2):4-11.
[12] 邱均平, 王菲菲. 基于共现与耦合的馆藏文献资源深度聚合研究探析[J].中国图书馆学报, 2013(5):25-32.
[13] 邱均平, 温芳芳. 近五年来图书情报学研究热点与前沿的可视化分析——基于13种高影响力外文源刊的计量研究[J].中国图书馆学报, 2011, 37(3):51-60.
[14] Price D S. The scientific foundations of science policy[J]. Nature, 1965, 206(4): 233-238.
[15] Lotka A J. The frequency distribution of scientific productivity[J]. Journal of the Washington Academy of Science, 1926, 16(19):317-323.
[16] 宋艳辉, 武夷山. 作者文献耦合分析与关键词耦合分析比较研究:Scientometrics实证分析[J].中国图书馆学报, 2014, 40(1):25-37.
[17] 盛小平, 刘泳洁. 知识管理不是一种管理时尚而是一门学科——兼论知识管理学科研究进展[J].情报理论与实践, 2009, 32(8):4-7.
[18] 文庭孝.论科学评价理伦研究的发展趋势[J].评价与管理, 2005, 5(2): 51-62.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
