Information resources of statistic objectives of bibliometric indicators are analyzed firstly, including three types of inputs, outputs and benefits, and research units of different numbers of researchers. Then bibliometric indicators about Geographic information system (GIS) are reviewed, such as the common indicators, h index and its derivative indexes, and citation-based knowledge flow indicator. Thirdly, the spatial display of the bibliometric indicators are discussed through two primary aspects of models and platforms. The spatial linked data of the bibliometric indicators need to be prepared and displayed in a variety of ways based on three formats of point, line and polygen, to further expand the functions of spatial analysis. Their applicability of platform is discussed for the spatial display of the bibliometric indicators from the aspects of commercial GIS software, open source GIS software and WebGIS.
[1] Pritchard A. Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics?[J]. Journal of Documentation, 1969, 25(4): 348-349.
[2] Vinkler P. Indicators are the essence of scientometrics and bibliometrics comments to the book entitled "Bibliometrics and Citation Analysis, From the Science Citation Index to Cybermetrics from Nicola De Bellis[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 85(3): 861-866.
[3] Wang Xuemei, Ma Mingguo, Li Xin, et al. Applications and researches of geographic information system technologies in bibliometrics[OL].[2014-01-10].http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007902Fs12145-013-0132-4.
[4] Hornbostel S. Welche Indikatoren zu welchem Zweck: Input, Throughput, Output[R] //Rbbecke M, Simon D. Qualitätsfrderung durch Evaluation? Ziele, Aufgaben und Verfahren im Wandel. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin fÜr Sozialforschung, 1999:55-72.
[5] DFG-Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. Research Units[EB/OL].[2011-10-06]. http://www.dfg.de/en/research_funding/programmes/coordinated_programmes/research_units/.
[6] Hinze S, Glänzel W. Scientometric indicators in use: An overview. Presentation at the European summer school for scientometrics[EB/OL].[2013-09-28]. http://www.scientometrics-school.eu/images/2_1_13Hinze.pdf.
[7] 谢黎, 邓勇, 张苏闽. 论文引用与专利引用比较研究[J]. 情报杂志2012, 31(4): 19-21.
[8] Thomson Reuters. Essential Science Indicators[OL].[2013-10-25].http://thomsonreuters.com/essential-science-indicators/.
[9] Auranen O, Nieminen M. University research funding and publication performance-An international comparison[J]. Research Policy, 2010, 39(6): 822-834.
[10] Garfield E. The impact factor and using it correctly[J]. Der Unfallchirurg, 1998, 101(6): 413-414.
[11] Egghe L, Rousseau R. Average and global impact of a set of journals[J]. Scientometrics, 1996, 36(1): 97-107.
[12] 朱丽娟, 李丽娜.科研合作计量指标研究述评[J]. 情报杂志, 2013, 32(6):76-79, 52.
[13] Erfanmanesh M, Rohani V A, Abrizah A. Co-authorship network of scientometrics research collaboration[J]. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 2012, 17(3): 73-93.
[14] 金碧辉, 汪寿阳, 汪冰, 等. 国际论文与国内论文合一统计方法研究[J]. 管理科学学报, 1999, 3(2):59-65.
[15] Hirsch J E. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005, 102(46): 16569-16572.
[16] 陈欣, 李晓菲. h指数及其相关计量指标研究综述[J]. 情报杂志, 2008, 27(9): 99-102.
[17] Ball P. Index aims for fair ranking of scientists[J]. Nature, 2005, 436(7053): 900.
[18] Anonymous. Impact factor[J]. Science, 2005, 309(5738): 1181.
[19] Glänzel W. On the h-index-A mathematical approach to a new measure of publication activity and citation impact[J]. Scientometrics, 2006, 67(2):315-321.
[20] Rousseau R. Hirsch指数研究的新进展.刘俊婉, 译[J]. 科学观察, 2006, 1(4): 23-25.
[21] Costas R, Bordons M. The h-index: Advantages, limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2007, 1(3): 193-203.
[22] Egghe L. Theory and practise of the g-index[J]. Scientometrics, 2006, 69(1): 131-152.
[23] Kosmulski M. A new Hirsch-type index saves time and works equally well as the original h-index[J]. ISSI Newsletter, 2006(3): 4-6.
[24] 金碧辉. 科学家为自己设计了一项评价指标: h指数[J]. 科学观察, 2006, 1(1): 8-9.
[25] Jin Bihui, Liang Liming, Rousseau R, et al. The R-and AR-indices: Complementing the h-index[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2007, 52(6): 855-863.
[26] Batista P D, Campiteli M G, Kinouchi O, et al. Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests[J]. Scientometrics, 2006, 68(1): 179-189.
[27] Sidiropoulos A, Kataros D. Gneralized Hirsch h-index for disclosing latent facts in citation networks[J]. Scientometrics, 2007, 72(2): 253-280.
[28] Boisot M H.Knowledge assets: Securing competitive advantage in the information economy: Securing competitive advantage in the information economy[M]. Oxford:Oxford University Press, 1998:1-10.
[29] Bhupatiraju S, Nomalerb O, Triulzia T, et al. Knowledge flows-Analyzing the core literature of innovation, entrepreneurship and science and technology studies[J]. Research Policy, 2012, 41(7):1205-1218.
[30] Alcácer J, Michelle G. Patent citations as a measure of knowledge flows: The influence of examiner citations[J]. Review of Economics and Statistics, 2006, 88(4): 774-779.
[31] Ponomariov B, Toivanen H. Research and development: Bibliometric analysis of knowledge flows of Brazilian research 2005-2009[C] //Proceedings of the ACSIP 2011. Atlanta:IEEE, 2011: 1-13.
[32] Hassan S, Haddawy P. Measuring international knowledge flows and scholarly impact of scientific research[J]. Scientometrics, 2013, 94(1):163-179.
[33] Glänzel W, Schubert A. Cross-national preference in co-authorship, references and citations[J]. Scientometrics, 2005, 65(3):323-342.
[34] Schubert A, Glänzel W. Domesticity and internationality in co-authorship, references and citations[J]. Scientometrics, 2006, 69(1):409-428.
[35] Waltman L, Tijssen R J W, van Eck N J. Globalisation of science in kilometres[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2011, 5(4):574-582.
[36] Ahlgren P, Persson O, Tijssen R. Geographical distance in bibliometric relations within epistemic communities[J]. Scientometrics, 2013, 95(2):771-784.
[37] Wu Jiang. Geographical knowledge diffusion and spatial diversity citation rank[J]. Scientometrics, 2013, 94 (1):181-201.
[38] Bornmann L, Waltman L. The detection of "hot regions" in the geography of science—A visualization approach by using density maps[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2011, 5(1):547-553.
[39] Hengl T, Minasny B, Gould M. A geostatistical analysis of geostatistics[J]. Scientometrics, 2009, 80(2): 491-514.
[40] 王雪梅, 李新, 马明国, 等. 青藏高原科研文献地理信息空间分析研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2012, 27(11):1288-1294.
[41] Carvalho R, Batty M. The geography of scientific productivity: Scaling in US computer science[J]. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2006(10):P10012:1-11.
