收稿日期: 2014-02-17
修回日期: 2014-03-03
网络出版日期: 2014-03-20
基金资助
本文系国家自然科学基金青年项目“社交媒体环境下虚拟社会资本的形成机理与影响研究”（项目编号：71303225）和教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金“我国电子治理战略的演进机理、推进路径和实施策略”（项目编号：12YJC630055）研究成果之一。
Research on Policy Content of the Disclosure of Government Information in China：Based on Stewardship and Usefulness Principles
Received date: 2014-02-17
Revised date: 2014-03-03
Online published: 2014-03-20
引入“保管—实用性”的政策原则，以《中华人民共和国政府信息公开条例》为样本，分析我国目前政府信息公开政策的内容体系。研究得出：我国信息公开政策在系统化和精细化建设等方面存在不足，政府信息资源的应用与服务体系尚未建立；我国信息公开政策的制定需要兼顾政府的保管职责及信息的实用性质。
关键词： 政府信息公开; 保管—实用性; 《中华人民共和国政府信息公开条例》; 内容体系
关欣 , 李芳玲 , 张秀吉 , 孟庆国 . 基于“保管—实用性”原则的我国政府信息公开政策的内容体系研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014 , 58(06) : 48 -53,88 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2014.06.008
This paper introduces "Stewardship and Usefulness" principles, and selects "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Disclosure of Government Information" as a sample, then analyzes our current policy content system of the disclosure of government information in China. This research indicates: The policy of China's information disclosure is deficient in systematic and meticulous construction; the application and service system of our government information resources has not been established; and the policy-making should consider "Stewardship and Usefulness" principles.
[1] 韩大元,杨福忠.试论我国政府信息公开法治化[J].国家行政学院学报,2004(2):58-62.
[2] 张淑芬,周艳,李庆芬. 各国政府信息公开现状比较[J].农业图书情报学刊,2005(20):126-128.
[3] 泽莱兹尼.传播法判例——自由、限制与现代媒介[M].王秀丽,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2007:23.
[4] 芳汀.构建虚拟政府——信息技术与制度创新[M].邵国松,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2010:9.
[5] Van Ryzin G C, Muzzio D, Immerwahr S, et al.Drivers and consequences of citizen satisfaction[J].Public Administration Review, 2004,64(3):331-341.
[6] Anne C,Suzanne S. The find-it! IIlinois controlled vocabulary:Improving access to government information through the Jessica subject tree[J]. Government Information Quarterly, 2001,18(3):195-208.
[7] Sharon S D, Theresa A P, Anthony M C. Designing electronic government information access programs:A holistic approach[J].Government Information Quarterly, 2004,21(1):3-23.
[8] Dawes S S.Stewardship and usefulness: Policy principles for information-based transparency [J]. Government Information Quarterly, 2010,27(4): 377-383.
[9] George B.Availability, access, authenticity, and persistence: Creating the environment for permanent public access to electronic government information[J].Government Information Quarterly, 2002,19(1):37-43.
[10] Takashi K. Access to government information in Japan:Along way toward electronic government?[J].Government Information Quarterly, 2003,20(l):47-62.
[11] Karen H. Lessons learned about access to government information after World War II can be applied after September 11[J].Govemmentlnformation Quarterly, 2008,25(1): 90-103.
[12] Roxanne M. Access to Australian government information:A decade of change 1997-2007[J].Government Information Quarterly, 2008, 25(1):25-37.
[13] Tyson M. Cutting off access to government information: Loopholes in the access to information act generated by the information highway[J].Journal of Government Information, 2009,24(10):l-8.
[14] Robin S.The landlocked island: Information access and communications policy in Nepal[J]. Telecommunications Policy, 2009,33(3):207-214.
[15] Erskine H. The polls: Government information public policy[J].Journal of Public Opinion Quarterly, 1974,38(4):623-634.
[16] Debble L R. FOIL and FOIA compared: A comparison between the Freedom of Information Law in Israel and the U.S. Freedom of Information Act[J]. Journal of Government Information,1999,26(2):89-108.
[17] Harold C R. Federal freedom of information policy: Highlight of recent developments[J]. Government Information Quarterly,2009,26(2):314-320.
[18] 侯登华,张祎慧.试论我国政府信息公开法律制度的完善[J].电子政务,2009(6):85-89.
[19] Weingarten F W. Federal information policy development:The congressional perspective[M]. Norwood: Ablex, 1989:79.
[20] 郑磊. 西方公共信息政策文献概述:定义与分析框架[J]. 电子政务,2008(2):122-124.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
