理论研究

中美政府信息质量的法律规范比较

  • 相丽玲 ,
  • 宋璐
展开
  • 山西大学经济与管理学院
相丽玲,山西大学经济与管理学院教授,博士

收稿日期: 2014-01-11

  修回日期: 2014-03-01

  网络出版日期: 2014-03-20

基金资助

本文系国家社会科学基金项目“信息支援的法律制度研究”(项目编号:12BTQ035)研究成果之一。

Comparison of Legal Norms of Government Information Quality in China and United States

  • Xiang Liling ,
  • Song Lu
Expand
  • Department of Economics and Management, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006

Received date: 2014-01-11

  Revised date: 2014-03-01

  Online published: 2014-03-20

摘要

针对中美政府信息质量的法规,从法律界定、审查机制、法律执行体系、法律实施效果等方面进行比较,提出完善我国政府信息质量法律规范的建议,包括明确政府信息质量标准的定义,规范现有政府信息质量法规,加快单行信息质量法的制定,完善社会评议制度,指定专门机构定期评估政府信息质量,提高政府工作人员的信息质量意识。

本文引用格式

相丽玲 , 宋璐 . 中美政府信息质量的法律规范比较[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014 , 58(06) : 54 -57 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2014.06.009

Abstract

Legal norms of government information quality in China and United States are compared in legal definition, review mechanism, enforcement system, and enforcement effectiveness. It proposes the suggestion that China should establish and improve the government information quality law which includes increasing a clear definition of government information quality standards, specifying existing legal norms of government information quality, developing the Information Quality Act, improving social appraisals, specifying specialized agencies to regularly assess the quality of government information,and improving government officials' information quality awareness.

参考文献

[1] 高志勇,高建民,王侃昌,等.基于信息结构要素的信息质量定义与内涵分析[J].计算机集成制造系统,2006,12(10):1724-1728.

[2] Guidelines for ensuring and maximizing the quality, objectivity,utility, and integrity of information disseminated by federal agencies[EB/OL].[2014-02-09].http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/fedreg_final_information_quality_guidelines/.

[3] Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (Public Law 106-554)Sec. 515[EB/OL].[2014-02-09].http://www.fws.gov/informationquality/section515.html.

[4] 张建彬.政府信息公开的信息质量研究[J].情报理论与实践,2012,35(11):29-33.

[5] 宋立荣,彭洁.美国政府"信息质量法"的介绍及其启示[J].情报杂志,2012,31(2):12-18.

[6] United States Government Accountability Office. Report to Congressional requesters, expanded oversight and clearer guidance by the office of management and budget could improve agencies' implementation of the Act[EB/OL].[2014-02-09].http://www.gao.gov/fraudnet/fra.

文章导航

/