收稿日期: 2014-03-05
修回日期: 2014-03-21
网络出版日期: 2014-04-05
基金资助
本文系中国科学院战略性先导专项子课题“新一代信息技术研究战略情报知识环境与服务”(项目编号:XDA06010102)研究成果之一。
A Method of Automatically Counting Annual Citation Frequency of Theses Using Google Scholar
Received date: 2014-03-05
Revised date: 2014-03-21
Online published: 2014-04-05
首先阐述在数字科研时代,在学术交流渠道多元化、网络化的环境下,谷歌学术搜索(Google Scholar)可作为计算机科学领域引文分析的数据源的原因。然后,对目前自动化地采集Google Scholar的引文数据的现状进行概述;进而以统计图灵奖获得者所发表论文的年度引文频次为例,着重阐述如何利用Google Scholar引擎的引文搜索功能设计相关程序,实现对论文各年度被引频次的自动统计;最后,将该方法与Web of Science进行比较,并对实现过程中遇到的问题进行总结。
关键词: Google Scholar; 谷歌学术搜索; 引文频次统计; 自动统计
和晋飞 , 吕锋昌 , 房俊民 . 利用Google Scholar自动统计引文年度被引频次的方法[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014 , 58(07) : 88 -94,118 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2014.07.015
At first,this paper elaborates why Google Scholar can be used as an data source for citation analysis of computer science in the digital scientific research age, with the characteristics of various academic exchange ways and network environment. Then, this paper summarizes the status quo about automatic Google Scholar citation data acquisition and thus points out the advantage of this paper. And then by taking an example of counting citation frequency of theses published by Turing award winners, the citation search function of Google Schoalr search engine is emphatically stated. In addition, the authors develop a program automatically completing a statistics of annual citation frequency of theses and analyze the data. Finally, this method is compared with that of the web of science, and this paper states some deficiencies of the program implemented and relative improvements proposed.
Key words: Google; Scholar; statistics of citation frequency; automatic statistics
[1] 董文鸳. 数字科研时代的引文分析——基于被引频次分析的实证研究[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2007(2): 36-39.
[2] 张文彦. Google数字图书馆计划[J]. 数字图书馆论坛, 2005 (10): 18-23.
[3] Bosman J, van Mourik I, Rasch M,et al. Scopus reviewed and compared: The coverage and functionality of the citation database Scopus, including comparisons with Web of Science and Google Scholar[J]. 2006, 1-63.
[4] Kousha K,Thelwall M. Google Scholar citations and Google Web/URL citations: A multi-discipline exploratory analysis[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2007, 58 (7): 1055-1065.
[5] Bar-llan J, Levene M,Lin A. Some measures for comparing citation databases[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2007, 1 (1): 26-34.
[6] Franceschet M. A comparison of bibliometric indicators for computer science scholars and journals on Web of Science and Google Scholar[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 83 (1): 243-258.
[7] 陶慧卿, 庄琦, 潘卫. 关于Google Scholar与Web of Science引文分析的实证研究[J]. 中国索引, 2008, 6 (4): 57-62.
[8] 高明. 探析学术文献传播和运用的新途径:开放访问运动[J]. 图书馆建设, 2005 (5): 28-31.
[9] 杨雪. “开放获取”的前世今生 为什么这么受欢迎[EB/OL].[2014-02-25].http://www.stdaily.com/jbsj/eb/201402/t20140223_651083.shtml.
[10] Publish or Perish 软件官网[EB/OL].[2014-03-19].http://www.harzing.com/pop.htm.
[11] The DBLP Computer Science Bibliography[EB/OL].[2014-03-19].http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/.
[12] Google Search Appliance/Google Mini[EB/OL].[2013-11-23].https://developers.google.com/search-appliance/documentation/50/xml_reference.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |