情报研究

不同类型论文层面计量指标间的相关性研究

  • 由庆斌 ,
  • 汤珊红
展开
  • 1. 中国国防科技信息中心;
    2. 北京大学信息管理系
由庆斌,中国国防科技信息中心硕士研究生,E-mail:853113737@qq.com;汤珊红,中国国防科技信息中心副研究员,北京大学信息管理系博士研究生。

收稿日期: 2014-02-24

  修回日期: 2014-04-01

  网络出版日期: 2014-04-20

Study on Correlation of Different Article-level Metrics

  • You Qingbin ,
  • Tang Shanhong
Expand
  • 1. China Defense Science and Technology Information Center, Beijing 100142;
    2. Department of Information Management, Peking University, Beijing 100871

Received date: 2014-02-24

  Revised date: 2014-04-01

  Online published: 2014-04-20

摘要

对补充计量学的研究背景进行梳理,总结出补充计量学的5个特点,并对论文层面计量指标体系和当前常用的补充计量工具进行介绍。为探究综合性指标Altmetric score与引用指标之间的关系,分别对PLOS和F1000网站中提供的论文数据和指标数据进行收集,检测两个指标之间的相关性,并对比两组实验结果。结果表明,Altmetric score与引用指标存在正相关关系,且在评价论文时具有一定的一致性。

本文引用格式

由庆斌 , 汤珊红 . 不同类型论文层面计量指标间的相关性研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014 , 58(08) : 79 -84 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2014.08.013

Abstract

This paper sorts out the research background of altmetrics, sums up its five characteristics, then introduces the indicator system of article-level metrics and some frequently-used altmetrics tools. In order to explore the relationship between altmetric score and citation indicator, it respectively collects the article data and indicator data from PLOS and F1000, detects their correlation, and compares the results of the two experiments. The results show that there is positive correlation between altmetric score and citation indicator, and they have some consistency in evaluating articles.

参考文献

[1] 刘春丽. Web2. 0 环境下的科学计量学: 选择性计量学[J]. 图书情报工作, 2012, 56(14): 52-56.

[2] Scholars seek better ways to track impact online[EB/OL].[2014-01-15].http://chronicle.com/article/As-Scholarship-Goes-Digital/130482/?sid=wc&utm_source=wc&utm_medium=en.

[3] Scholars seek better ways to track impact online[EB/OL].[2014-01-15].http://chronicle.com/article/As-Scholarship-Goes-Digital/130482/?sid=wc&utm_source=wc&utm_medium=en.

[4] Galligan F, Dyas-Correia S. Altmetrics: Rethinking the way we measure[J]. Serials Review, 2013, 39(1): 56-61.

[5] 邱均平,余厚强. 替代计量学的提出过程与研究进展[J]. 图书情报工作, 2013, 57(19): 5-12.

[6] Cabezas-Clavijo , Torres-Salinas D. Indicadores de uso y participación en lasrevistascientíficas 2.0:el caso de PLoSOne[J]. El profesional de la información, 2010, 19(4): 431-434.

[7] Eysenbach G. Can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on Twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact[J]. Journal of Medical Lnternet Research, 2011, 13(4):123-129.

[8] Li Xuemei, Thelwall M, Giustini D. Validating online reference managers for scholarly impact measurement[J]. Scientometrics, 2012, 91(2): 461-471.

[9] Torres D, Cabezas Á, Jiménez E. Altmetrics: New indicators for scientific communication in Web 2.0[J]. Comunicar, 2013, 21(41):53-60.

[10] 宋丽萍, 王建芳. 基于 F1000 与WoS的同行评议与文献计量相关性研究[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2013 (2): 62-69.

[11] 刘春丽, 何钦成. 不同类型选择性计量指标评价论文相关性研究——基于Mendeley, F1000 和 Google Scholar 三种学术社交网络工具[J]. 情报学报, 2013, 32(2): 206-212.

[12] 顾立平. 论文级别计量研究:应用案例分析[J]. 现代图书情报技术,2013(11):1-5.

[13] Mounce R. Open access and altmetrics: Distinct but complementary[J]. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2013, 39(4): 14-17.

[14] Chamberlain S. Consuming article-level metrics: Observations and lessons[J]. Information Standards Quarterly, 2013, 25(2): 4-13.

[15] Lin J, Fenner M. Altmetrics in evolution: Defining & redefining the ontology of article-level metrics[J]. Information Standards Quarterly, 2013, 25(2): 20-26.

[16] Plum Analytics [OL].[2014-01-15].http://www.plumanalytics.com/about.html.

[17] Citedin[OL]. [2014-01-15].http://citedin.org/.

[18] Reader Meter[OL]. [2014-01-15].http:// readermeter.org/.

[19] ScienceCard[OL]. [2014-01-15].http:// sciencecard.org/.

[20] ImpactStory[OL]. [2014-01-15].http:// impactstory.org/.

[21] Altmetric.com [OL]. [2014-01-15].http://altmetric.com/.

[22] PLOS Impact Explorer [OL].[2014-01-15]. http://www.altmetric.com/demos/plos.html.

[23] PaperCritic[OL]. [2014-01-15]. http://www.papercritic.com/about.

文章导航

/