收稿日期: 2014-03-07
修回日期: 2014-04-01
网络出版日期: 2014-04-20
Measurement of the Research Topics of Research Institutions：A Case Study on Information Science of China
Received date: 2014-03-07
Revised date: 2014-04-01
Online published: 2014-04-20
张发亮 , 谭宗颖 , 王燕萍 . 科研机构研究主题的测度——以我国情报学领域为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014 , 58(08) : 85 -90 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2014.08.014
The research topics of institutions are measured and recognized based on keywords co-occurrence and clustering analysis. This paper presents a method to measure the distribution of topics, the main and leading topics of the research institutions, from three aspects of the scope, strength and quality of the research topics. The cited counts and frequencies of keywords are also displayed on the maps to show the features of research topics vividly. 9 institutions which have the information science PhD grant are used as examples, to analyze the distribution, strength and influence of their research topics.
[1] 赵福芹.我国高等教育研究主题变化研究[D].上海:华东师范大学,2008:9-10.
[2] Molinari A, Molinari J. Mathematical aspects of a new criterion for ranking scientific institutions based on the h-index[J]. Scientometrics,2008,75(2) : 339-356.
[3] Arencibia J, Barrios A,Femandez H, et al. Applying successive H indices in the institutional evaluation: A case study[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2008,59(1): 155-157.
[4] Abramo G, D'Angelo C, Viel F. The suitability of h and g indexes for measuring the research performance of institutions[J]. Scientometrics, 2013,97(3):555-570.
[5] Lazaridis T. Ranking university departments using the mean h-index[J]. Scientometrics, 2010(1): 211-216.
[6] 岳婷,杨立英.H_m指数在科研机构评价中的适用性研究——以“艾滋病病毒感染与治疗”主题为例[J].图书情报工作,2012,56(18):38-43.
[7] Grauwin S, Jensen P. Mapping scientific institutions[J]. Scientometrics,2011(3): 943-954.
[8] Cobo M J,Lopez H, Herrera V, et al.An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A ractical application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory field[J]. Journal of Informetrics,2011,5(1) 146-166.
[9] 王莉亚,张志强.近十年国外图书情报学专业研究领域可视化分析——基于社会网络分析和战略坐标图[J].情报杂志,2012(2):56-61.
[10] 庞弘燊,方曙.科研机构的科研状况研究——基于论文特征项共现分析方法[J].国家图书馆学刊,2011(3):66-73.
[11] 季莹,于光,王铁成,等.中国作者在《Nature》杂志上发表论文的共词图谱分析[J].情报杂志, 2011(5):28-32.
[12] Fidelia I,SanJuan E. From term variants to research topics[J].Knowledge Organization, 2002,29(3):181-197.
[13] Besselaar P, Heimeriks G. Mapping research topics using word-reference co-occurrences: A method and an exploratory case study[J].Scientometrics, 2006,68(3) 377-393.
[14] 杨颖,崔雷.基于共词分析的学科结构可视化表达方法的探讨[J].现代情报,2011(1):91-96.
[15] 汤建民. 基于文献计量的卓越科研机构描绘方法研究——以国内教育学科为例[J]. 情报杂志, 2010(4):5-9,35.
[16] 张自立,张紫琼,李向阳,等.基于2-模网络的科研单位和关键词共现分析方法[J].情报学报, 2011,30(12):1249-1260.
[17] 余丰民,汤建民.国内图书情报领域的卓越机构描绘[J].情报杂志,2013(8):109-114.
[18] 安璐,余传明,李纲,等.中美图情科研机构研究领域的比较研究[EB/OL].[2013-11-24]. http://www.cnki.net/kcms/doi/10.13530/j.cnki.jlis.140004.html.
[19] 安璐,余传明,杨书会,等.国内图书馆学情报学科研机构研究领域的可视化挖掘[J].情报资料工作,2013(4):50-56.
[20] 杨颖.基于共词分析的学科结构可视化研究[D].沈阳:中国医科大学,2010.
[21] 风笑天.社会学研究方法[M].北京: 中国人民大学出版社,2009: 159.
[22] Callon M, Courtial J P, Laville F, et al.Co-word analysis for basic and technological reseach[J].Scientmetrics,1991,22 (2): 155-205.
[23] 魏瑞斌.基于关键词的情报学研究主题分析[J].情报科学,2006(9):1400-1404,1434.
[24] 苏新宁,夏立新.2000—2009年我国数字图书馆研究主题领域分析——基于CSSCI关键词统计数据[J].中国图书馆学报,2011(4):60-69.
[25] 黄小燕.情报领域研究热点透视——情报领域论文关键词词频分析(1999-2003)[J].图书与情报,2005(6):82-84,110.
[26] 赖茂生,王琳,杨文欣,等. 情报学前沿领域的确定与讨论[J]. 图书情报工作, 2008,52(3): 15-18.
[27] 王知津,李赞梅.二十年以来我国情报学学科体系研究进展[J].图书馆,2012(1):50-54.
[28] 李长玲,支岭,纪雪梅,等.我国情报学研究进展——基于期刊论文关键词的统计分析[J].图书情报工作,2010,54(12):31-36.
[29] 田瑞强,潘云涛,姚长青.情报学代表性学术机构研究焦点比较分析[J].情报杂志,2013(2):12-19,39.
[30] 覃凤兰.中国图书情报学机构学术影响力研究报告 [J].新世纪图书馆,2009(1):15-18.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
