图书情报工作

图书情报工作 >

2014 , Vol. 58 >Issue 08: 128 - 132

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2014.08.020

综述述评

一个新的综合性科技评价指标——p指数研究综述

  • 夏慧 ,
  • 韩毅
展开
  • 西南大学计算机与信息科学学院
夏慧，西南大学计算机与信息科学学院硕士研究生

收稿日期: 2014-03-11

  修回日期: 2014-04-05

  网络出版日期: 2014-04-20

收起

A New Comprehensive Metric Indicator to Science and Technology：A Review on P-index

  • Xia Hui ,
  • Han Yi
Expand
  • College of Computer and Information Science, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715

Received date: 2014-03-11

  Revised date: 2014-04-05

  Online published: 2014-04-20

Fold

摘要

指出p指数是衍生于h指数的测度评价对象学术影响力的综合性指标。从历史发展的时间顺序讨论p指数在理论研究、实践运用等方面取得的主要成果。基于这些研究成果概括总结出p指数兼顾质量、具备灵敏度和区分度等优点，指出p指数存在着不能反映引文分布情况及未考虑时间因素等问题，针对其所存在问题提出进一步的研究思路和改进意见。

关键词： p指数; 科技评价指标; 科技评估; 研究综述

本文引用格式

夏慧 , 韩毅 . 一个新的综合性科技评价指标——p指数研究综述[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014 , 58(08) : 128 -132 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2014.08.020

Abstract

The p-index is a comprehensive measurement of one's academic influence derived from h-index. The main achievement in theory research, practical application and some other aspects about p-index has been discussed by the time sequence. Some advantages, such as integration of the qualitative factor and quantitative one, sensitivity and distinguish ability, have been summarized based on the current researches. Some problems in the p-index are presented, such as the lack of citations distribution factor and the omission of time factor. At last, the further research ideas and planning for the problems are given.

Key words： p-index; evaluation indicator to science and technology; evaluation of science and technology; research review

参考文献

[1] Lee C J, Sugimoto C R, Zhang Guo, et al. Bias in peer review[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2013, 64(1):2-17.

[2] 加菲尔德.引文索引法的理论及应用[M].侯汉清,陆宝树,马张华,译.北京:北京图书馆出版社,2004.

[3] Geisler R.科学技术测度体系[M].周萍,译.北京:科学技术文献出版社,2003:113-124.

[4] Hirsch J E. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2005,102(46):16569-16572.

[5] Egghe L. Theory and practise of the g-index [J].Scientometrics,2006, 69 (1) : 131-152.

[6] Rousseau R. New developments related to the Hirsh Index [J]. Science Focus, 2006,1 (4): 23-25.

[7] Kosmulski M. A new Hirsch- type index saves time and works equally well as the original h- index[J]. ISSI Newsletter, 2006,2(3):4-6.

[8] 金碧辉,Rousseau R. R 指数、AR 指数: h 指数功能扩展的补充指标[J].科学观察,2007,2(3) : 1- 8.

[9] Kelly C D, Jennions M D. The h-index and career assessment by numbers [J]. Trends in Ecology & Evolution,2006,21(4): 167-170.

[10] Sidiropoulos A,Katsaros D,Manolopoulos Y. Generalized Hirsch h-index for disclosing latent facts in citation networks[J]. Scientometrics, 2007, 72 (2):253-280.

[11] Bar-Ilan J. Which h-index?——A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar [J]. Scientometrics, 2008, 74 (2) : 257-271.

[12] Glnzel W. On the h-index——A mathematical approach to a new measure of publication activity and citation impact[J]. Scientometrics,2006, 67(2):315-321.

[13] Schubert A, Glnzel W. A systematic analysis of Hirsch-type indices for journal[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2007,1 (3) : 179-184.

[14] Glnzel W. On some new bibliometric applications of statistics related to the h-index [J]. Scientometrics, 2008, 77(1): 187-196.

[15] 王志军,郑德俊. P指数运用于人才评价的有效性实证研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2012,56(14): 93-97.

[16] Lindsey D. The scientific publication system in social science [M].San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1978.

[17] Csajbok E, Berhidi A, Vasas L, et al. Hirsch-index for countries based on essential science indicators data[J]. Scientometrics, 2007, 73(1): 91-117.

[18] Prathap G. Is there a place for a mock h-index? [J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 84(1):153-165.

[19] Prathap G. The 100 most prolific economists using the p -index[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 84(1): 167-172.

[20] Prathap G. A performance index approach to library collection [J]. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 2010, 11(3):259-265.

[21] Prathap G.E=Pi2-the energy of ideas approach to biblometric research assessment[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 57(3):282-286.

[22] Prathap G. An iCE map approach to evaluate performance and efficiency of scientific production of countries [J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 85(1): 185-191.

[23] Prathap G. The iCE approach for journal evaluation [J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 85(2): 561-565.

[24] Prathap G. Qualifying scholarly impact using an iCX(impact-Citations-Exergy)analysis [J]. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 2011, 31(5): 382-386.

[25] Prathap G. The fractional and harmonic p-indices for multiple authorship [J]. Scientometrics, 2011, 86(2): 239-244.

[26] 张正慧,郑德俊. P指数用于学术期刊评价的适用性分析[J].图书情报工作,2013,57(19):121-126.

[27] Petersen A M, Succi S. The Z-index: A geometric representation of productivity and impact which accounts for information in the entire rank-citation profile[J]. Journal of Informetrics,2013,7(4):823-832.

Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉