收稿日期: 2014-04-08
修回日期: 2014-06-05
网络出版日期: 2014-06-20
Web 2.0 Technologies Application in the US Academic Libraries
Received date: 2014-04-08
Revised date: 2014-06-05
Online published: 2014-06-20
通过网络调研Web 2.0在美国顶级大学图书馆网站的使用情况。结果显示：最受欢迎的Web 2.0技术是SNS，使用率达到100%；其次为Blog，RSS和IM，分别占90%以上；Vodcasts（占47%），Podcasts（占46%）和Social bookmarking（占39%）也较受欢迎；Wiki的使用率较低，仅占1/3。认为Web 2.0在这些图书馆的使用情况和技术结构模式在一定程度上反映美国大学图书馆服务数字化、互动化、个性化的发展趋势，同时也映射出世界图书馆服务人性化、互动化的变化。研究结果可为专业图书馆信息研究管理者、Web 2.0部署人员以及图书馆用户等相关人士提供参考意见和建议。
白丽娜 , 王颖纯 , 刘燕权 . 美国顶级大学图书馆应用Web 2.0的现状调查与分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014 , 58(12) : 6 -11 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2014.12.001
By exploring Web 2.0 technologies' usage and trends in the top U.S. academic libraries as exemplified through the University & College Library websites, findings indicated that each of the 100 academic libraries had made SNS the most widely applied Web 2.0 tool. Blog was the second most popular tool with 99% participation rate, followed by RSS and IM/Chat with 97% and 91% respectively. The Vodcasts and Podcasts had 47% and 46% participation rates respectively. Social bookmarking/tagging was also used by 39% of the academic libraries. The Wiki was the least applied Web 2.0 technology with 34% participation rate. The library website usage and technical structure model reflected the development of the top U.S. academic libraries to a certain extent in terms of digitalization, interaction and personalization, mapping the changes of the world digital library services.
Key words： Web 2.0; academic libraries; digital libraries; USA
[1] 宋丽荣,李平,李健,等.Web 2.0技术在图书馆网站建设与服务中的应用研究[J].图书馆工作与研究,2013(2): 48-51.
[2] Cromity J. Web 2.0 tools for social and professional use[J].Online, 2008,32(5): 30-33.
[3] Xu Chen, Ouyang Fenfei, Chu Heting. The academic library meets Web 2.0: Applications and implications[J].Journal of Academic Librarianship, 2009,35(4):324-331.
[4] Linh N C. A survey of the application of Web 2.0 in Australasian university libraries[J].Library Hi Tech, 2008,26(4): 630-653.
[5] Liu Shu. Engaging users: The future of academic library web sites[J].College & Research Libraries, 2008,69(1): 6-27.
[6] Han Zhipingf, Yan Quan Liu.Web 2.0 applications in top Chinese university libraries[J].Library Hi Tech, 2010, 28(1): 41-62.
[7] Mahmood K. Richardson J. Adoption of Web 2.0 in US academic libraries: A survey of ARL library websites[J]. Program, 2010, 45(4):365-375.
[8] Bierman J. Valentino M L. Podcasting initiatives in American research libraries[J].Library Hi Tech, 2011,29(2):349-358.
[9] Rudman R. Incremental risks in web 2.0 applications[J].Electronic Library, 2010,28 (2): 210-230.
[10] Neal J G,Jaggars D E. Web 2.0: Redefining and extending the service commitment of academic library[C]//McKnight S. Envisioning Future Library Services: Initiatives, Ideas and Challenges. London: Facet Publishing:2010.
[11] Morville P. Rosenfeld L. Information architecture for the World Wide Web[M]. California:CMI,2006.
[12] U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Academic Libraries Survey (ALS)[EB/OL].[2013-02-03].http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2012/2012365.pdf.
[13] Sweitzer K,Volkwein F. Prestige among graduate and professional schools: Comparing the U.S. News' graduate school reputation ratings between disciplines[J].Research in Higher Education, 2009,50(8):812-836.
[14] U.S. News & World Report. Best colleges ranking[EB/OL].[2013-02-15] http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-colleges.
[15] Tripathi M. Kumar S. Use of Web 2.0 tools in academic libraries: A reconnaissance of the international landscape[J].The International Information & Library Review, 2010,42(2): 195-207.
[16] Alves L, Maciel M, Ponciano L, et al. Assessing the impact of the social network on marking photos as favorites in Flicker[EB/OL].[2013-05-15]http://www.lsd.ufcg.edu.br/relatorios_tecnicos/TR-2012-01.pdf.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
