收稿日期: 2014-06-13
修回日期: 2014-07-22
网络出版日期: 2014-08-20
基金资助
本文系国家社会科学基金项目“人文社会科学评价中同行评议与科学计量相结合的机理分析与对策研究”（项目编号：11BTQ21）和ISTIC-ELSEVIER期刊评价研究中心开放基金资助项目“低被引对高被引作者贡献的实证研究和机理分析——“N-O”假设成立吗？”研究成果之一。
Empirical Research on Citing Appearance of High Cited Papers of Information Science & Library Science
Received date: 2014-06-13
Revised date: 2014-07-22
Online published: 2014-08-20
张立伟 , 姜春林 , 刘学 , 陈悦 . 图书情报学高被引论文引用现象的实证研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014 , 58(16) : 116 -121 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2014.16.018
The academic papers are major carrier to export the scientific achievements and to communicate the knowledge and information, while being cited is regarded as the important way to identify and accept scientific achievements. As a result, getting the proportional distribution of the papers which are cited by the high cited papers is very significant to know the constitution of the high cited papers. This paper taking the discipline of Information Science & Library Science as example, based on the empirical study, proportionally collects the high cited papers of Information Science & Library Science which are included in WoS(Web of Science), and counts cited number of the cited papers which are cited by the high cited papers. Then this paper analyzes the ratio of data for the high cited papers with incomplete inductive method. Based on that, we get the rule of the citation of the high cited papers. Firstly, the research of this paper shows that the high cited paper cites more high cited papers and it also cites large number of low cites paper. Secondly, this paper also finds that with cited frequency of high cited papers reduced, the high cited references of the high cited papers are also reduced.
Key words： highly cited paper; N hypothesis; O hypothesis; cite-identify
[1] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.GB7714-1987文后参考文献著录规则[S].北京:中国标准出版社,1987.
[2] 马凤, 武夷山. 引用认同——一个值得注意的概念[J]. 图书情报工作, 2009, 53(16): 27-30.
[3] 姜春林,张立伟,谷丽,等. 知识单元视角下学术论文评价研究[J]. 情报杂志,2014,33(4): 29-34.
[4] Peritz B C. On the objectives of citation analysis: Problems of theory and method[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1992, 43(6): 448-451.
[5] Garfield E. The history and meaning of the journal impact factor[J]. Jama, 2006, 295(1): 90-93.
[6] Garfield E. Journal impact factor:A brief review[J]. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 1999, 161(8): 979-980.
[7] Hirsch J E. An index to quantify an individual'
s scientific research output[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005, 102(46): 16569-16572.
[8] Ball P. Index aims for fair ranking of scientists[J]. Nature, 2005, 436(7053): 900.
[9] Braun T, Glänzel W, Schubert A. A Hirsch-type index for journals[J]. Scientometrics, 2006, 69(1): 169-173.
[10] Egghe L, Rousseau R. An informetric model for the Hirsch-index[J]. Scientometrics, 2006, 69(1): 121-129.
[11] Egghe L. Dynamic h‐index: The Hirsch index in function of time[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2007, 58(3): 452-454.
[12] Egghe L. Theory and practice of the g-index. Scientometrics, 2006, 69(1): 131-152.
[13] The International DOI Foundation. The DOI Handbook [EB/OL]. October 2006(5)[2014-06-02]. http://dx.do.iorg/10.1000/186.
[14] The DOI Handbook. Edition 4.4.1.5 October 2006 [EB/OL]. [2014-06-05].http://www.doi.org/handbook_2000/DOI Handbook-v4-4.pdf
[15] 孙书军, 朱全娥. 内容质量决定论文的被引频次[J]. 编辑学报, 2010, 22(2): 141-143.
[16] 高继平, 丁堃, 刘宇, 等. 知识基础与前沿载文间的知识流动分析——以信息领域中的 Gerard Salton 为例[J]. 情报杂志, 2009 (10): 98-102.
[17] Persson O. The intellectual base and research fronts of JASIS 1986–1990[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1994, 45(1): 31-38.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
