收稿日期: 2014-04-28
修回日期: 2014-08-06
网络出版日期: 2014-09-05
基金资助
本文系国家自然科学基金重点项目“流域文化变迁与生态演化相互作用对流域生态政策影响的机理研究——黑河与澳大利亚墨累-达令河对比研究”（项目编号: 91125007）、中国科学院文献情报能力专项项目“基于知识流地理扩散的科研活跃中心动态变化监测”（项目编号: Y300121001） 和中国科学院兰州文献情报中心业务发展领域前沿扫描项目“国际科技评价活动与前沿方法扫描”（项目编号: Y300201001） 研究成果之一。
Evaluation of the Research Institutions Based on h-index family and an Improved Index：Take Resources and Environment Research on Heihe River Basin for Example
Received date: 2014-04-28
Revised date: 2014-08-06
Online published: 2014-09-05
韦博洋 , 王雪梅 , 张志强 . 基于h指数族的科研机构评价及其改进——以黑河流域资源环境领域研究为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014 , 58(17) : 112 -118 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2014.17.017
This study analyzed the characteristics of h-index, g-index, hg-index, R-index, (h, R)-index and Hm -index comprehensively when used to evaluate the research institutions. According to the ideas of Hm -index, it proposed Rm -index, eliminating the effect of scale of publications. The evaluation objects were the institutions publishing articles in the field of resources and environment focusing on Heihe River Basin. After analyzing the differences and similarities between the index's evaluations, the results showed that the existing index could reflect the impact of institutions from different aspects. Compared to others, while used for evaluate institutions, Rm -index is more comprehensive and integrated to a certain extent, able to eliminate the effect of scale of publications more completely than Hm-index.
Key words： h-index family; Rm-index; institution evaluation; Heihe River Basin
[1] Hirsch J E.An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2005,102(46):16569-16572.
[2] 万锦堃,花平寰,赵呈刚.中国部分重点大学h指数的探讨[J].科学观察,2007(3):9-16.
[3] 赵基明.h指数及其在中国学木期刊评价中的应用[J].评价与管理,2007(4):14-20.
[4] 周志峰,万荣根,俞树文.h指数视角的高校学术水平分析[J].情报杂志,2010(3):71-74.
[5] Egghe L.Theory and Practise of the G-index[J].Scientometrics,2006,69(1):131-152.
[6] 叶鹰.h指数和类h指数的机理分析与实证研究导引[J].大学图书馆学报,2007(5):2-5.
[7] Prathap G.Hirsch-type indices for ranking institutions' scientific research output[J].Current Science,2006,91(11):1439-1439.
[8] Molinari J F, Molinari A. A new methodology for ranking scientific institutions[J].Scientometrics,2008,75(1):163-174.
[9] Molinari A, Molinari J F. Mathematical aspects of a new criterion for ranking scientific institutions based on the H-index[J].Scientometrics,2008,75(2):339-356.
[10] Jin Bihui,Liang Liming,Rousseau R, et al.The R-and ar-indices:Complementing the H-index[J].Chinese Science Bulletin,2007(6):855-863.
[11] Franceschini F, Galetto M, Maisano D, et al.The Success-index: An alternative approach to the H-index for evaluating an individual's research output[J].Scientometrics,2012,92(3):621-641.
[12] Franceschini F, Maisano D, Mastrogiacomo L.Evaluating research institutions: The potential of the Success-index[J].Scientometrics,2013,96(1):85-101.
[13] 关忠诚,许惠,熊慧琴.基于模糊的偏好DEA在科研机构评价中的应用[J].科研管理,2007(2):9-14.
[14] 迟国泰,隋聪,齐菲.基于超效率DEA的科学技术评价模型及其实证[J].科研管理,2010(2):94-104.
[15] 吴明智,王红,刘瑞娟.hg指数用于评价高校图书馆科研影响力的实证研究[J].中华医学图书情报杂志,2013(2):20-22,51.
[16] 岳婷,杨立英.Hm指数在科研机构评价中的适用性研究——以"艾滋病病毒感染与治疗"主题为例[J].图书情报工作,2012,56(18):38-43.
[17] Garfield E.Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology and humanities[M].New York:Wiley,1979.
[18] 李新,刘绍民,马明国,等.黑河流域生态—水文过程综合遥感观测联合试验总体设计[J].地球科学进展,2012(5):481-498.
[19] 赵良菊,肖洪浪,程国栋,等.黑河下游河岸林植物水分来源初步研究[J].地球学报,2008(6):709-718.
[20] 赵良菊,尹力,肖洪浪,等.黑河源区水汽来源及地表径流组成的稳定同位素证据[J].科学通报,2011(1):58-70.
[21] 李新,马明国,王建,等.黑河流域遥感—地面观测同步试验:科学目标与试验方案[J].地球科学进展,2008(9):897-914.
[22] 程国栋.黑河流域水-生态-经济系统综合管理研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2009.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
