收稿日期: 2014-11-13
修回日期: 2014-12-15
网络出版日期: 2015-01-05
Applicability Adjustments of User Satisfaction Measurement Tools in Public Libraries
Received date: 2014-11-13
Revised date: 2014-12-15
Online published: 2015-01-05
[目的/意义] 目前公共图书馆缺乏用户满意度的深入研究成果,开展测评工具在这个领域的适用性研究显得尤为重要,对通用满意度测评工具在公共图书馆的适用性进行调整,并探索测评工具适用性调整的可行性思路。[方法/过程] 采用体验式验证方法,从测评工具的逻辑结构、测评量表等级以及样本采集范围入手进行调整。[结果/结论] 用户满意度是服务质量测评的一个重要维度,测评模型与方法直接影响测评结果。测评指标的设置要有针对性,不要刻意地做特殊化设计;调查问卷的难度要适中,测评量表等级以5级为宜;应当减少抽样调查的随机性,适当控制向未成年人发放问卷的数量。
施春林 , 冯继强 . 用户满意度测评工具在公共图书馆的适用性调整[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015 , 59(1) : 40 -44 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2015.01.005
[Purpose/significance] There is lack of in-depth study of user satisfaction measurement in public libraries, so it is particularly important to research the application of measurement tools in this field. This paper adjusts the applicability of user satisfaction measurement tools in public libraries, and explores the feasibility of ideas to make the applicability adjustment of the measurement tools.[Method/process] Using experiential authentication method, this paper makes some adjustments from the logical structure of measurement tools, the evaluation scale ratings, and the sample collection ranges.[Result/conclusion] User satisfaction is an important dimension of service quality evaluation, and the measurement model and methodology directly impact on the measurement results. The evaluation indexes are set up to the point, not to special design deliberately; the difficulty of the questionnaire should be moderate, and the five evaluation scale ratings are appropriate; it should reduce randomness of the sample survey, and properly control the number of the questionnaires that are distributed to juveniles.
[1] 王秀华,吴冬曼.LibQUAL+TM和Insync Survey的比较研究及启示[J].图书馆,2010(5):88-90.
[2] 吴冬曼,郭依群.LibQUAL+®的演进与我国本地化研究与实践[J].图书情报工作,2012,56(15):43-48.
[3] 张为杰,杨广锋,周婕.Insync Surveys 图书馆用户满意度调查分析[J].图书情报知识,2009(6):34-38.
[4] 张爱霞,沈玉兰.基于用户满意度指数的图书馆用户调查问卷的设计[J].情报理论与实践,2009,32(1):86-89.
[5] 刘锦源.LibQUAL+AM的信度与效度检验: 来自本土大学图书馆的证据[J].图书情报工作,2007,59(9):96-99.
[6] 张文娟.图书馆工作绩效与用户满意度评价比较研究[J].情报资料工作,2012(2):102-104.
[7] 孙恒韬.图书馆读者满意度研究的文献计量分析[J].情报探索,2013(6):126-129.
[8] 钱佳平,刘兹恒.图书馆服务质量测评的影响因素及控制研究[J].中国图书馆学报,2006,32(1):56-60.
[9] 吴冬曼,邵敏,郭依群,等.基于用户需求的图书馆服务质量评价研究[M].上海:上海交通大学出版社,2012:53-54.
[10] 蒋鸿标.我国图书馆读者满意度研究的误区及对策[J].情报杂志,2010,29(1):192-194.
[11] 施春林,汪春麟.读者满意度的一种补充调查方法[J].图书馆杂志,2013(9):57-61.
[12] 刘方方,张蓓蓓.公共图书馆读者满意度调查的科学性研究[J].图书馆学刊,2013(9):66-68.
[13] 刘锦源.价值重于满意: 图书馆服务质量模型的验证与启示[J].图书情报知识,2010(6):50-55.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |