收稿日期: 2014-11-28
修回日期: 2015-01-06
网络出版日期: 2015-01-20
基金资助
本文系中国科学协会课题项目"信息化环境下的学术交流研究"(课题编号:2009SXJLKT02)研究成果之一。
Research on Barriers of Education Resources Disclosure Based on Researchers' Attitudes: Taking Courseware Resources as Example
Received date: 2014-11-28
Revised date: 2015-01-06
Online published: 2015-01-20
[目的/意义]教育资源的网上公开,有助于促进知识的广泛传播与成果的开放共享。以教育资源中的课件资源为研究内容,分析我国研究人员对课件资源网上公开会遭受商业目的使用、知识产权侵害、学术优势地位丧失、学生学习行为影响、学风争议危险等障碍的认知情况。[方法/过程]采取问卷调查方法,向全国32个省市发放1 600份问卷;采取访谈法,对武汉大学12名教师进行了逐一访谈。[结果/结论]研究发现,我国研究人员最担忧将课件上网会导致"被他人不正当使用"、"被用于商业目的"、"损害内容完整性",其次为"内容不便公开"、"影响学生学习行为"、"丧失学术优势地位"、"引起学风争议",最不担忧"如何将课件上网";研究人员的年龄、性别、职称、身份与其对课件上网的障碍认知有一定关联。为消除不同研究人员的担忧与顾虑,促进网络学术信息资源的自由流通,建议以平衡公共利益为目的合理保护课件著作权,加强学术道德规范建设,建立权威的课件发布和学术交流平台,并在考核激励机制上给予保障。
陈鹏 . 研究人员视角的教育资源网上公开障碍研究—以课件资源为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015 , 59(2) : 11 -16 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2015.02.002
[Purpose/significance] The paper takes courseware among education resources as research content and analyzes researchers' cognitive situation about barrier factors of courseware disclosure in commercial purposes use, damage of Intellectual Property, loss of academic advantage position, affection of students' study behaviors, controversy of academic norm, etc. [Method/process] The paper makes surveys on researchers by questionnaires, sending out 1600 questionnaires to 32 provinces and cities in China; also interviews 12 teachers of Wuhan University during March to April in 2011. [Result/conclusion] Three barrier factors are the most worrying: improper use by others, commercial purposes use, damage of content integrity; the less worrying factors are inconvenience of content disclosure and affection of students' learning behavior, loss of academic advantage position, controversy of academic norm; the least worry factor is how to disclose the courseware. The age, gender, identity and title of researchers have a certain relationship with their cognitive. Results have certain reliability on the basis of a large number of sample surveys. For the sake of free flow, sharing and accessibility of network academic information resources, for example, protecting courseware's copyright to keep balance of public interests, strengthening the academic ethnic construction, establishing the courseware disclosure and academic communication platform, and providing the inspection and drive mechanism for the guarantee of the researchers.
[1] 苹果iTunes U教育内容下载量超十亿[EB/OL].[2014-04-20]. http://www.cnbeta.com/articles/228050.htm.
[2] Loggie K, Barron A, Gulitz E, et al. Intellectual property and online courses: Policies at major research universities[J]. Quarterly Review of Distance Education,2007,8(2):109-125.
[3] Talab R. Faculty distance courseware ownership and the "Wal-Mart" approach to higher education[J]. TechTrends, 2007,51(4):9-12.
[4] 齐振国,汪琼. E- Learning 给我国高校教师带来的挑战[J].电化教育研究,2009(7):24-25.
[5] Wang Chang-hwa, Chen Cheng-ping. An analysis of factors influencing the user acceptance of openCourse ware[J]. Computer Applications for Database, Education, and Ubiquitous Computing Communications in Computer and Information Science, 2012,352:15-22.
[6] 冯晓光,肖玉坤,孙红玲. 高校教师课件的著作权分析[J].北京化工大学学报(社会科学版),2009(1):33-35.
[7] 余珊珊. 网络信息资源著作权保护问题研究[J].情报探索,2006(12):68-69.
[8] 陈传夫. 开放内容的类型及其知识产权管理[J].中国图书馆学报,2003(6):11-13.
[9] 《高等学校哲学社会科学研究学术规范(试行)[EB/OL].[2014-04-15]. http://www.edu.cn/20041118/3121016.shtml.
[10] 国家中长期科学和技术发展规划纲要(2006-2020年)[EB/OL].[2014-04-16]. http://www.gov.cn/jrzg/2006-02/09/content_183787.htmNational medium and long-term science and technology development plan.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |