情报研究

历史影响因子:一个新的学术期刊存量评价指标

  • 俞立平
展开
  • 宁波大学商学院管理工程系 宁波 315211
俞立平(ORCID:0000-0001-9079-1165),教授,博士,E-mail:yuliping@nbu.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2014-11-13

  修回日期: 2014-12-27

  网络出版日期: 2015-01-20

History Impact Factor:A New Academic Journal Stock Assessment Index

  • Yu Liping
Expand
  • Department of Management and Engineering, Business School, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211

Received date: 2014-11-13

  Revised date: 2014-12-27

  Online published: 2015-01-20

摘要

[目的/意义]期刊评价指标是期刊某个视角水平的综合体现,因此有必要必须不断深化和发展;提出一个新的期刊存量指标——历史影响因子,就是期刊总被引频次除以载文量再除以办刊年限。[方法/过程]以科技管理类期刊为例,基于中国知网数据库CNKI,采用相关系数、聚类分析、岭回归进行了实证。[结果/结论]研究表明,历史影响因子兼有影响因子和h指数的优点,克服了传统期刊评价指标存量指标过少、不考虑期刊办刊时间、不考虑期刊载文数量等局限,是一个较好的期刊评价指标。历史影响因子没有考虑期刊自引问题,而且不同的引文数据库对历史影响因子的影响也比较大,在具体应用时可根据需要排除自引或选择其他引文数据库。

本文引用格式

俞立平 . 历史影响因子:一个新的学术期刊存量评价指标[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015 , 59(2) : 89 -92 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2015.02.014

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] Evaluation index of journals is the comprehensive reflection of journals in a perspective level, so it must be deepened and developed. This paper presents a new journal stock index-historical influence factor, which means the total cited frequency of journal divided by the published paper amount and then divided by running period. [Method/process] Taking technology management periodicals as an example, and based on Chinese Net database CNKI, this article uses correlation coefficient, cluster analysis and ridge regression for empirical study. [Result/conclusion] The result shows that history impact factor is an excellent journal evaluation index. Because it not only has the advantages of impact factor and H-index, but also overcomes the limitations of traditional periodicals, such as too little stock index, regardless the journals of time, regardless the number of periodicals. Historical influence factor does not consider the citation problems of journal itself and different citation database has great influence on historical influence factor. So in the specific application, it should exclude journal itself citations or choose other citation database according to needs.

参考文献

[1] Moed H F. Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals[J]. Journal of Informetrics,2010,4(3):265-277.
[2] Kosmulski M. Successful papers: A new idea in evaluation of scientific output[J]. Journal of Informetrics,2011,5(3): 481-485.
[3] Bergstrom C T,West J D,et al.The Eigenfactor Metrics[J].The Journal of Neuroscience,2008,28(45):11433-11434.
[4] Markpin T, Boonradsamee B, Ruksinsut K,et al. Article-count impact factor of materials science journals in SCI database[J]. Scientometrics,2008,75(2): 251-261.
[5] Hirsch J.An Index to Quantify an Individual's Scientific Research Output[A].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2005,102 (46):16569-16572.
[6] Rousseau R. New developments related to the hirsch index[J]. Science focus,2006,1(4):23-2.
[7] 赵均. 学术期刊评价中被引量指标及其影响因素分析[J]. 现代出版,2013(4):64-70.
[8] 赵星,高小强. 期刊h型指数与论文数量和被引的关系实证[J]. 图书情报工作,2009,53(20):131-134.
[9] 汪跃春,胡敏. h 指数与发文量、篇均引文量关系模型的验证与评价[J]. 情报杂志,2011(10):49-54.
[10] 朱大明. 基于引证的科技期刊学术价值指数初探[J]. 科技管理研究,2012(14):61-63,73.
[11] 金碧辉,Rousseau R. R 指 数、AR 指 数 :h 指 数功能扩展的补充指标[J]. 科学观察,2007,2(3):1-8.
[12] 郭海鸥. 学术评价的新方法——h 指数及其应用分析[J]. 河南教育学院学报(自然科学版),2009,18(2),45-47.
[13] 俞立平 孙建红. 总被引频次用于科技评价的误区研究——兼谈科技评价的时间特性[J]. 中国科技期刊研究,2014(6):829-832.

文章导航

/