收稿日期: 2015-02-03
修回日期: 2015-03-20
网络出版日期: 2015-04-05
The Construction of Academic Impact Evaluation System of Sci-Tech Books in China Under Multiple Dimensions
Received date: 2015-02-03
Revised date: 2015-03-20
Online published: 2015-04-05
[目的/意义]在分析当前图书评价研究现状的基础上,结合现实的数据应用特征,从多维角度建立中文科技图书学术影响力评价体系,进行图书学术影响力评价的有益探索.[方法/过程]采用书评分析、引文分析、专家调查法、层次分析法、加权综合评价法等多种方法进行研究,在评价的基本框架内选取27个研究指标并将其归纳为4个维度,在确定权重的基础上选取医学领域3个学科进行实证分析.[结果/结论]实证分析结果给出了3个学科不同类型最有影响力的图书目录;发现科技图书呈现长尾分布、外文图书翻译版影响力高等特点.最后利用CALIS馆藏图书馆数量对实证分析评价结果进行验证,证明评价体系的有效性.
张玉 , 潘云涛 , 袁军鹏 , 苏成 , 马峥 , 刘娜 , 殷蜀梅 , 张群 . 论多维视角下中文科技图书学术影响力评价体系的构建[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015 , 59(7) : 69 -76 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2015.07.009
[Purpose/significance] Based on the present development of the book evaluation research, the article combines with the feature of real data and constructs the academic impact evaluation system of Sci-Tech Books in China from multiple dimensions. It is a beneficial exploration evaluation of academic influence of books. [Method/process] Based on review analysis, citation analysis, expert survey, AHP and so on, 27 indexes are selected from evaluation framework and summarized from different levels of academic influence. [Result/conclusion] After determining the weight coefficients of indicators, the article carries out empirical analysis in the medical field. Eventually we obtain the most influential academic books in those subject and type. The results show some features, such as long-tailed distributions, highly influential of foreign language books translated version and so on. CALIS holdings data evaluates the effectiveness of the result.
Key words： book evaluation; index system; academic impact; multiple dimensions
[1] 国家新闻出版广电总局规划发展司.2013年全国新闻出版业基本情况[EB/OL]. [2014-12-07]. http://www.gapp.gov.cn/govpublic/80/795.shtml.
[2] 何峻. 我国图书评价现状分析[J].大学图书馆学报,2012(3):106-110.
[3] Wilson J E. An evaluation of medical book reviews [J].Bulletin of the medical library Association,1945,33(3):305-314.
[4] Kousha K, Mike T.Google book search: Citation analysis for social science and the humanities[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2009,60(8):1537-1549.
[5] Gorraiz J, Purnell P J, Glanzel W. Opportunities for and limitations of the book citation index[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2013,64(7):1388-1398.
[6] 苏新宁. 我国人文社会科学图书被引概况分析——基于CSSCI数据库[J]. 东岳论丛,2009(7):5-13.
[7] 叶继元. 《中文图书引文索引·人文社会科学》示范数据库研制过程、意义及其启示[J]. 大学图书馆学报,2013(1):48-53.
[8] 邢红梅,吕先竞. 图书评价及其模型研究现状的分析[J]. 四川图书馆学报,2014(3):29-32.
[9] 李杭. RFM模型在图书质量评价系统中的应用[J]. 农业图书情报学刊,2014,26(2): 54-57.
[10] 张海营. 基于RFM模型的图书馆图书评价系统研究[J]. 图书馆,2012(3):60-62.
[11] 李雁翎,孙晓慧,陈玖冰. 五维图书评价体系及分析模型的建构[J]. 情报科学,2013,31(8):77-80,140.
[12] 罗紫初,秦洁雯. 当当网和卓越亚马逊网的营销模式研究[J]. 编辑之友,2010(2):8-11.
[13] 孙逸敏. 利用SPSS软件分析变量间的相关性[J]. 新疆教育学院学报,2007,23(2):120-123.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
