理论研究

基于关联理论分析引文产生的认知机制

  • 周秋菊 ,
  • 冷伏海
展开
  • 1. 中国科学院文献情报中心 北京 100190;
    2. 中国科学院大学 北京 100049
周秋菊(ORCID:0000-0001-8891-762X),助理研究员,博士研究生

收稿日期: 2015-01-29

  修回日期: 2015-03-13

  网络出版日期: 2015-04-05

Analysis of Cognitive Mechanism for the Citation Cause Based on Relevance Theory

  • Zhou Qiuju ,
  • Leng Fuhai
Expand
  • 1. National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190;
    2. University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049

Received date: 2015-01-29

  Revised date: 2015-03-13

  Online published: 2015-04-05

摘要

[目的/意义]用认知语言学的关联理论解释学术论文写作过程中引文产生的认知机制.[方法/过程]指出"关联性"是引用产生的前提条件和必备要素,同时也指出关联理论可以作为"知识传承"的理论基础.[结果/结论]交际者(作者、读者)通过引文为交际双方构建共同的认知语境.双方认知语境信息或假设的趋同过程,是交际双方根据引文追寻最大和最佳关联的过程.

本文引用格式

周秋菊 , 冷伏海 . 基于关联理论分析引文产生的认知机制[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015 , 59(7) : 77 -82 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2015.07.010

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] Analyze the role of citation in academic writing with the related concepts of Relevance Theory. [Method/process] "Relevance" is a precondition for the cause of citation. Relevance Theory can also serves as the cognitive theoretical framework to interpret "knowledge transmission". [Result/conclusion] The communicators (authors and readers) construct a common cognitive context through citation for themselves. The convergence process of cognitive context information or assumptions for authors and readers is the process for communicators seek the maximal and optimal relevance through citation.

参考文献

[1] Saracevic T. Relevance: A review of and a framework for the thinking on the notion in information science [J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science,1975,26(6):321-343.
[2] 马费成. 论情报学的基本原理及理论体系构建[J]. 情报学报,2007,26(1):3-13.
[3] 梁战平. 我国科技情报研究的探索与发展[J]. 情报探索,2007(7):3-7.
[4] Sperber D,Wilson D. Relevance:Communication and cognition [M]. 2nd ed. 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社,2001.
[5] 何自然. 语用三论: 关联论·顺应论·模因论[M]. 上海: 上海教育出版社, 2007.
[6] 薛耀琴. 新世纪10年国内外关联理论发展与应用述评[J]. 电子科技大学学报(社科版),2012,14(5):75-78.
[7] 熊学亮.认知语用学概论[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社,1999.
[8] 胡璇. 从关联理论到"广义认知语用学"——近20年国内认知语用学研究回顾与思考[J].外语学刊, 2013(3):60-65.
[9] 周杨. 关联理论研究综述[J].咸宁学院学报,2011,31(5):88-89.
[10] Harter S P. Psychological relevance and information science [J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1992, 43(9):602-615.
[11] White H D. Combining bibliometrics, information retrieval, and relevance theory, part 1: First examples of a synthesis[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2007,58(4):536-559.
[12] White H D. Combining bibliometrics, information retrieval, and relevance theory, part 2: Some implications for information science[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2007,58(4):583-605.
[13] White H D.Relevance theory and citations[J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 2011, 43(14):3345-3361.
[14] Saracevic T. Relevance: A review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Part II: Nature and manifestations of relevance[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2007,58(3):1915-1933.
[15] Saracevic T. Relevance: A review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Part III: Behavior and effects of relevance[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2007,58(13):2126-2144.
[16] 章磊.从关联理论的角度看情报检索中的自然语言[J]. 大学图书情报学刊,2005,23(1):3-4.
[17] 成颖, 孙建军, 李宝强.基于关联理论的信息检索相关性研究——信息生产、标引[J]. 情报科学,2010,28(1):7-13.
[18] 成颖, 孙建军, 李宝强. 基于关联理论的信息检索相关性研究[J].情报科学,2010,28(2):176-181.
[19] Garfield E.Can citation indexing be automated ? [J].Essays of an Information Scientist,1962(1):84 -90.
[20] Weinstock M. Citation indexes, encyclopedia of library and information science[M]. New York: Marcel Dekker,1971:16-40.
[21] Lipetz B A.Improvement of the selectivity of citation indexes[J]. American Documentation, 1965,16(2):81-90.
[22] Hanney S, Grant J, Jones T, et al. Categorising citations to trace research impact[C]//Ingwersen P, Larsen B. Proceedings of ISSI 2005. Stockholm: Karolinska University Press, 2005:656-657.
[23] Brooks T A. Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science,1985,36(4):223-229.
[24] Brooks T A.Evidence of complex citer motivations[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1986, 37(4):34 -36.
[25] Vinkler P. A quasi-quantitative citation model [J].Scientometrics,1987,12(1): 47-72.
[26] Cano V.Citation behavior:Classification, utility, and location[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1989, 40(4):284 -290.
[27] 马凤,武夷山.关于论文引用动机的问卷调查研究——以中国期刊研究界和情报学界为例[J].情报杂志,2009,28(6):9-14.
[28] Kaplan N. The norms of citation behavior: Prolegomena to the footnote[J]. American Documentation,1965,16(3):179-184.
[29] Gilbert G N. Referencing as persuasion [J]. Social Studies of Science,1977,7(1):113-122.
[30] Liu Yuxian, Rousseau R. Interestingness and the essence of citation [J]. Journal of Documentation, 2013,69(4):580-589.
[31] Zipf G K. Human behavior and the principle of least effort[M].Cambridge: Addison-Wesley,1949.
[32] Hyland K.Activity and evaluation:Reporting practices in academic writing[M]//Flowerdew J.Academic Discourse.Harlow:Pearson Education Limited,2002: 115.
[33] 李淑康,李克.认知语境理论框架下的关联理论[J].济宁师范专科学校学报,2006,27(6):50-52.
[34] Kristeva J. Desire in language: A semiotic approach to literature and art[M]. Oxford: Blackwell, 1980.
[35] Bakhtin M M. The dialogic imagination:Four essays[M].Austin: University of Texas Press,1981.
[36] 黄小平. 新闻类学术论文与参考文献的主体互文性研究[J].阜阳师范学院学报(社会科学版), 2014(2):6-13.
[37] 叶继元. 引文的本质及其学术评价功能辨析[J].中国图书馆学报,2010,36(1):35-39.
[38] Swale J. GenreAnalysis: English academic and research settings[M].Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
[39] Thompson G.Reporting: Collins co-build English guides 5[M].London: Harper Collins Publishers,1994:204.
[40] 冉永平,薛媛.关联理论与语用研究[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版),1998(4):76-81.
[41] 朱大明. 批评性引文也产生学术影响[J]. 科技导报, 2008, 26(2):99.
[42] Small H. Cited documents as concept symbols [J]. Social Studies of Science, 1978, 8 (3):327-340.
[43] Bavelas J B. The social psychology of citations [J]. Canadian Psychological Review,1978,19(2):158-163.
[44] Garfield E."Obliteration Phenomenon" in science and the advantage of being obliterated![J] Current Contents,1975(51/52):5-7.
[45] 陈超美.科学前沿图谱:知识可视化探索[M].陈悦,等译.北京:科学出版社,2014:152-153.
[46] Garfield E. The use of citation data in writing the history of science[R]. Philadelphia:Institute for Scientific Information Inc, 1964.
[47] Kessler M M. Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers[J]. American Documentation, 1963,14(1): 10-25.
[48] Small H. Cocitation in scientific literature: New measure of relationship between 2 documents [J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science,1973,24(4):265-269.
[49] Callon M, Law J, Tuner W, et al. From translations to poblematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis [J]. Social Science Information, 1983,22(2):191-235.
[50] Cronin B. Metatheorizing citation-comments on theories of citation? [J]. Scientometrics, 1998,43(1):45-55.
[51] Baldi S. Normative versus social constructivist processes in the allocations of citations:A network-analytic model[J]. American Sociological Review,1998,63(6):829-846.
[52] 潘云涛, 武夷山. 自引、他引: 说不尽的故事[N]. 科技导报,2007,25(24):85.
[53] Case D O, Miller J B. Do bibliometricians cite differently from other scholars?[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2011,62(3):421-432.

文章导航

/