收稿日期: 2015-06-20
修回日期: 2015-07-15
网络出版日期: 2015-08-05
Correlation Study on Evaluation Indicators of Scientific Institution Influence from the Perspective of Altmetrics
Received date: 2015-06-20
Revised date: 2015-07-15
Online published: 2015-08-05
[目的/意义] 多样化的科研成果、数字化的出版方式、网络化的科研交流呼唤新的机构影响力评价指标,探讨Altmetrics指标与传统科研机构影响力评价指标以及Altmetrics指标内部之间的相关性,有益于更好地探索数字环境下如何更加客观、有效地开展科研机构影响力评价。[方法/过程]以 Plum Analytics为数据源,基于样本机构2012-2015年间的引用数据与Altmetrics数据,开展指标之间的相关性分析。[结果/结论] 多元化的Altmetrics指标可反映多维化的机构影响力信息,故应当引入Altmetrics指标以全面审视机构影响力;指标数据源的属性在一定程度上决定了指标所反映的信息性质;要因评价对象的不同而遴选适宜的评价指标;对Altmetrics指标分类需作小范围调整。
关键词： Altmetrics; 科研机构影响力; 机构评价; 相关性分析; Plum Analytics
杨柳 , 陈贡 . Altmetrics视角下科研机构影响力评价指标的相关性研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015 , 59(15) : 106 -114,132 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2015.15.015
[Purpose/significance] All the diversified scientific achievements, digital publishing forms and networked scientific communication methods call for new indicators used to evaluate institution influence. With the purpose of exploring a more objective and more efficient way to evaluate institution influence, this paper discusses the correlation between Altmetrics indicators and traditional indicators used to evaluate the influence of scientific institutions, as well as internal Altmetrics indicators. [Method/process] Using Plum Analytics as the data source, based on the institution's citation data from 2012 to 2015, as well as Altmetrics data, we carry out the correlation analysis between the indicators. [Result/conclusion] Results show that diversified Altmetrics indicators can reflect the multidimensional information of institution influence. In order to evaluate institution influence comprehensively, Altmetrics indicators should be introduced. At the same time, it finds that the attributes of data sources determine the nature of Altmetrics indicators to some extent, and we should consider different evaluation objects and then choose different evaluation indicators. What's more, the classification of Altmetrics indicators needs to make an adjustment in a small scale.
[1] What's altmetrics?[EB/OL].[2015-05-28].http://altmetrics.org/about/.
[2] 邱均平, 余厚强.替代计量学的提出过程与研究进展[J].图书情报工作, 2013, 57(10):5-12.
[3] Bornmann L. Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics[J].Journal of Informetrics, 2014, 8(4):895-903.
[4] Li Xuemei, Thelwall M, Giustini D. Validating online reference managers for scholarly impact measurem[J]. Scientometrics, 2012, 91(2): 461-471.
[5] 由庆斌, 汤珊红.不同类型论文层面计量指标间的相关性研究[J].图书情报工作, 2014, 58(4):79-84.
[6] 由庆斌, 韦博, 汤珊红.基于补充计量学的论文影响力评价模型构建[J].图书情报工作, 2014, 58(11):5-11.
[7] 王贤文, 刘趁, 毛文莉.数字出版时代的科学论文综合评价研究[J].中国科技期刊研究, 2014, 25(11):1391-1396.
[8] 王睿, 胡文静, 郭玮.高Altmetrics指标科技论文学术影响力研究[J].图书情报工作, 2014, 58(11):92-98.
[9] 刘晓娟, 周建华, 尤斌.基于Mendeley与WoS的选择性计量指标与传统科学计量指标相关性研究[J].图书情报工作, 2015, 59(2):112-118.
[10] 王妍, 郭舒, 张建勇.学者影响力评价指标的相关性研究[J].图书情报工作, 2015, 59(3):106-112, 127.
[11] Ortega J L. Relationship between altmetric and bibliometric indicators across academic social sites: The case of CSIC's members[J].Journal of Informetrics, 2015, 9(1):39-49.
[12] 邱均平, 张心源, 董克.Altmetrics指标在机构知识库中的应用研究[J].图书情报工作, 2015, 59(6):100-105.
[13] 邱均平, 赵蓉英, 王菲菲, 等.世界一流大学与科研机构学科竞争力评价的做法、特色与结果分析[J].评价与管理, 2012, 10(2):18-24.
[14] 邱均平, 楼雯, 吴胜男, 等.中国与世界:一流大学与科研机构竞争力评价与结果分析[J].评价与管理, 2013, 10(2):27-32.
[15] 杨国梁, W.B.Liu, 李晓轩, 等.国际国立科研机构学术影响力评价方法研究[J].中国科技论坛, 2010(6):137-142.
[16] 关忠诚, 许惠, 熊慧琴.基于模糊的偏好DEA在科研机构评价中的应用[J].科研管理, 2007, 28(2).9-14.
[17] Hirsch J E. An index to quantity an individual's scientific research output[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2005, 102(46):16569-16572.
[18] Prathap G. Hirsch-type indices for ranking institutions' scientific research output[J/OL]. [2015-06-20].http://apps.webofknowledge.com/full_record.do?product=WOS&search_mode=GeneralSearch&qid=11&SID=P1pYIP4xbvxywT7EweI&page=1&doc=1.
[19] Molinari J F, Molinari A. A new methodology for ranking scientific institution[J]. Scientometrics, 2008, 75(1):163 -174.
[20] 岳婷, 杨立英.Hm指数在科研机构评价中的适用性研究——以"艾滋病病毒感染与治疗"主题为例[J].图书情报工作, 2012, 56(9):38-43.
[21] 韦博洋, 王雪梅, 张志强.基于h指数族的科研机构评价及其改进——以黑河流域资源环境领域研究为例[J].图书情报工作, 2014, 58(9):112-118.
[22] 谭荣波, 梅晓仁.SPSS统计分析实用教程[M].北京:科学出版社, 2007.
[23] 骆方, 刘红云, 黄崑.SPSS数据统计与分析[M].北京:清华大学出版社, 2011.
[24] Thelwall M, Fairclough R. The influence of time and discipline on the magnitude of correlations between citation counts and quality scores[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2015, 9(3):529-541.
[25] 宋丽萍, 王建芳.基于F1000与WoS的同行评议与文献计量相关性研究[J].中国图书馆学报, 2012, 38(3):63-69.
[26] About the company[EB/OL].[2015-6-20]. http://www.plumanalytics.com/about.html.
[27] 王睿, 胡文静, 郭玮.常用Altmetrics工具比较[J].现代图书情报技术, 2014(12):18-26.
[28] Thelwall M, Haustein S, Larivière V, et al.Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social Web services[J/OL].[2015-06-20]. http://apps.webofknowledge.com/full_record.do?product=WOS&search_mode=GeneralSearch&qid=14&SID=P1pYIP4xbvxywT7EweI&page=1&doc=1.
[29] 邱均平, 叶晓峰, 熊尊研.国外索引工具发展趋势研究——以Scopus为例[J].情报科学, 2009, 27(6):801-807.
[30] PMC[EB/OL].[2015-06-05]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/.
[31] History/mission[EB/OL].[2015-06-30]. http://www.crossref.org/01company/02history.html.
[32] About Europe PubMed Central[EB/OL].[2015-07-01]. http://europepmc.org/About.
[33] Leading Social Science Research Delivered Daily[EB/OL].[2015-07-01].http://www.ssrn.com/en/.
[34] About Us[EB/OL].[2015-07-01]. http://www.uspto.gov/about-us.
[35] General principles[EB/OL].[2015-07-01]. http://repec.org/.
[36] 肖奎, 李兵, 吴天吉.基于用户行为分析的维基百科词条质量评价方法[J].情报杂志, 2015(5):185-189.
[37] The word's largest programming community is growing[EB/OL].[2015-06-30]. http://stackexchange.com/about.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
