收稿日期: 2015-08-06
修回日期: 2015-08-17
网络出版日期: 2015-09-05
基金资助
本文系吉林省卫生和计划生育委员会项目"社区卫生档案数据采集及价值挖掘的创新模式研究 "(项目编号:2014R028) 研究成果之一。
Study on the NIMBY in Scientific Data Sharing
Received date: 2015-08-06
Revised date: 2015-08-17
Online published: 2015-09-05
[目的/意义]明确科研人员对科学数据共享的态度和意愿,探索影响科研人员数据共享的原因,发现有效促进科学数据在更大范围内共享和复用的方法。[方法/过程]利用文献分析法、访谈法等研究方法,构建科学数据共享影响因素,利用干预培训方法对科研人员进行干预,比较干预前后科研人员科学数据共享态度,找出有效促进科学数据共享的方法,最后给出有效提升科研人员科学数据共享意愿的方案。[结果/结论]调查发现,科研人员数据共享意愿中存在邻避现象,参考已有研究中邻避现象的解决方法对科研人员进行干预活动,对比干预前后数据,干预后科研人员科学数据共享感知风险降低,共享意愿提高,即邻避设施中的解决方法在科学数据共享中具有重要参考价值。
周姗姗 , 翁苏湘 , 毕强 , 徐坤 . 科学数据共享中的邻避现象及应对研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015 , 59(17) : 84 -88 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2015.17.013
[Purpose/significance]To understand the data sharing attitude and willingness of researchers, explore the reasons of data sharing, find an effective method to promote data sharing in a wider range and multiplexed, and maximize its value. [Method/process]Usedliterature analysis, interviews and other research methods to build scientific data sharing factors.Used intervention research staff training methods to intervene the researchers and compared before and after the intervention of scientific data sharing attitude,to identify effective methods ofscientific data sharing promotion and provide how to enhance the researchers’ willingness of scientific data sharing.[Result/conclusion]Through the survey wefound thatthe NIMBY phenomenon existsin scientific research personnel data sharing wishes. Considering the NIMBY phenomenonsolutions in environment facilities to conduct interventions to researchers, after comparing before and after the intervention data, we found that thescientific data shared awareness risk is reduced, and theshared willingness is improved.The NIMBY facilities solutions have important reference value in scientific data sharing.
Key words： scientific data; data sharing; NIMBY
[1] 傅天珍,郑江平. 国外面向科研人员的科学数据共享探析[J]. 图书馆论坛,2015(2):76-81.
[2] Das T K, Teng Bingsheng. The risk-based view of trust: A conceptual framework[J]. Journal of Business and Psychology, 2004, 19 (1):85-116.
[3] Yakovleva M, Reilly R R, Werko R.Why do we trust? Moving beyond individual to dyadic perceptions[J].Journal of Applied Psychology, 2010, 95 (1):79-91.
[4] 李小敏,胡象明. 邻避现象原因新析:风险认知与公众信任的视角[J]. 中国行政管理,2015(3):131-135.
[5] 姚德超,刘筱红. 邻避现象及其治理[J]. 城市问题,2014(4):2-8.
[6] 张向和,彭绪亚,彭莉. 基于人性公平视角的垃圾处理场邻避现象及其机制设计研究[J]. 求实,2011(S1):173-174.
[7] Mulligan A. The effect of the Internet on researcher motivations behavior and attitudes [J]. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2011, 67(2):290-311.
[8] Tenopir C, Allard S, Douglass K. Data sharing by scientists: Practices and perceptions [J]. PLoS ONE. 2011(6):1-21.
[9] 张静蓓,吕俊生,田野. 国外数据共享行为影响因素研究综述[J]. 图书情报工作,2014,58(4):136-142.
[10] 何琳,常颖聪. 科研人员数据共享意愿研究[J]. 图书与情报,2014(5):125-131.
[11] 张晋朝. 我国高校科研人员科学数据共享意愿研究[J]. 情报理论与实践,2013(10):25-30.
[12] Piwowar H A. Who shares who doesn’t factors associated with openly archiving raw research data[J]. PLoS ONE,2011,(7):25-33.
[13] 张计龙,殷沈琴,张用,等. 社会科学数据的共享与服务——以复旦大学社会科学数据共享平台为例[J]. 大学图书馆学报,2015(1):74-79.
[14] 项英,赖剑菲,丁宁. 高校图书馆科学数据管理服务实践探索——以武汉大学社会科学数据管理为例[J]. 情报理论与实践,2013(12):89-93.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
