收稿日期: 2015-09-01
修回日期: 2015-09-20
网络出版日期: 2015-10-05
基金资助
本文系国家社会科学基金重点项目"中国云计算知识产权问题与对策研究"(项目编号:11AZD113)研究成果之一。
Analysis on the Characteristics and Value of Patent Examiner Citations
Received date: 2015-09-01
Revised date: 2015-09-20
Online published: 2015-10-05
[目的/意义] 专利引文分析方法被广泛运用,但专利审查员引文的价值却常常被低估甚至误读,亟待澄清,这关乎专利文献内在机理的理解与专利文献潜在价值的挖掘。[方法/过程] 根据施引主体的不同,专利引文可分为申请人引文和审查员引文两类。比较表明,这两类引文有明显的区别特征。与申请人引文相比,专利审查员引文具有三大区别特征:一是施引专利与被引文献之间具有确定的技术相关性,二是格式规范、高度标准化,三是可获得性与数量优势明显。[结果/结论] 专利审查员引文的区别特征决定了其具有诉讼证据价值、知识交流和专利影响力的测量工具价值以及企业竞争情报价值。大数据技术的应用有助于专利审查员引文的价值实现,但其价值的深度挖掘还有待审查数据的充分公开、标引的规范和工具的优化。
肖冬梅 , 陈颖 . 专利审查员引文的特征与价值[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015 , 59(19) : 6 -14 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2015.19.001
[Purpose/significance] Patent citation analysis methods are widely used, but the value of patent examiner citations is often underestimated or even misunderstood, which needs to be clarified, for the reason that it is related to the understanding of the internal mechanism and potential value of patent literature. [Method/process] According to the subject of citations, patent citations include patent examiner citations and applicant citations. The comparison shows that these two types of patent citations have obvious differences. Compared with applicant citations, examiner citations have three main characteristics:firstly,assured technical correlation between citing patent and cited literature; secondly, format specification and high degree of standardization; thirdly, advantages in availability and quantity. [Result/conclusion] The value of examiner citations can be realized as a sort of litigation evidence, a measuring tool for knowledge flow and patent impact, or enterprise competitive intelligence.Application of big data technology will be helpful to the realization of the value of examiner citations. The fully mining of the value of examiner citations depends on sufficient disclosure of data from the review process, further standardization of patent citations and optimization of patent citation analysis tools.
Key words： patent citations; examiner; reference document; characteristics; value
[1] 国家知识产权局. 专利文献与信息名词解释:专利引文[EB/OL].[2015-08-01].http://www.sipo.gov.cn/wxfw/zlwxxxggfw/zsyd/zlwxjczs/zlwxymcjs/201406/t20140630_973313.html.
[2] Jaffe A B, Trajtenberg M, Hendson R. Geographic localizaton of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations[J].Quarterly Journal of Economics,1993,108(3):577-589.
[3] Tijssen R J W. Global and domestic utilization of industrial relevant science:Patent citation analysis of science-technology interactions and knowledge flows[J]. Research Policy, 2001, 30(1):35-54.
[4] 张虎胆,杨冠灿,吴恒. 审查员引文是否应作为专利引文"噪音"被剔除?[J].图书情报知识,2013(6):77-83.
[5] Lemley M A.The myth of the sole inventor[J].Michigan Law Review,2012,110(5):709-760.
[6] Alcácer J,Gitelman M,Sampat B.Applicant and examiner citations in U.S. patents:An overview and analysis[J].Research Policy,2009,38(2):415-427.
[7] Criscuolo P, Verspagen B. Does it matter where patent citations come from? Inventor vs. examiner citations in European patents[J].Research Policy,2008,37(10):1892-1908.
[8] Agrawal A, Henderson R. Putting patents in context:Exploring knowledge transfer from MIT[J].Management Science, 2002, 48(1):44-60.
[9] 李睿,孟连生. 论专利间引用关系分析中存在的问题[J].情报理论与实践,2009(7):39-43.
[10] 王兴旺.专利审查员引文及引文分析新观察[J]. 科技情报开发与经济,2011(25):148-150.
[11] 赵亚娟.专利引用分析方法与应用[J].图书情报工作,2009(6):11-15.
[12] Huang M H, Chiang L Y, Chen D Z.Constructing a patent citation map using bibliographic coupling:A study of Taiwan's high-tech companies[J]. Scientometrics, 2003,58(3):489-506.
[13] Wartburg I V, Teichert T, Rost K. Inventive progress measured by multi-stage patent citation analysis[J]. Research Policy, 2005,34(10):1591-1607.
[14] 洪勇,李英敏. 基于专利耦合的企业间技术相似性可视化研究[J].科学学研究,2013(7):1013-1021.
[15] 孙涛涛,金碧辉.关键技术挖掘与企业技术竞争情报——以DVD激光头技术为例[J].图书情报工作,2008,52(5):129-132.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
