专题:专利引文及其应用研究

中美专利引文比较研究

  • 隆瑾 ,
  • 何伟 ,
  • 吴秀文
展开
  • 湘潭大学知识产权学院 湘潭 411105
隆瑾(ORCID:0000-0002-1854-5258),法治湖南建设与区域社会治理协调创新中心研究员,博士研究生,E-mail:244032910@qq.com;何伟(ORCID:0000-0002-4143-5655),硕士研究生;吴秀文(ORCID:0000-0001-5319-2665),讲师,博士。

收稿日期: 2015-09-03

  修回日期: 2015-09-20

  网络出版日期: 2015-10-05

Comparative Research on Patent Citation from China and the USA

  • Long Jin ,
  • He Wei ,
  • Wu Xiuwen
Expand
  • Intellectual Property Institute of Xiangtan University, Xiangtan 411105

Received date: 2015-09-03

  Revised date: 2015-09-20

  Online published: 2015-10-05

摘要

[目的/意义] 比较中美专利引文的异同,对两者深入认识理解,明晰两者在揭示专利关联度、反映专利所有者间竞争关系、判断专利商业价值和法律稳定性等方面的异同,以利于专利引文价值的更好实现。[方法/过程] 研究中美专利引文的区别,并深入分析其专利制度和社会观念层面的原因。[结果/结论] 中美专利引文在著录内容、引用位置、排序标准、标识要素、类型标注及对PCT申请的国际阶段产生的专利引文态度等方面均存在差异,因而在建立专利引文数据库、挖掘专利引文情报时,只有区别处理,才能提高专利引文分析成果的准确性,更加有效地实现专利引文的价值。

本文引用格式

隆瑾 , 何伟 , 吴秀文 . 中美专利引文比较研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015 , 59(19) : 22 -29 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2015.19.003

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] Comparison of the similarities and differences between the Chinese and American patent citations, the two of them are deeply understood and defined, which is a better realization of the value of the patent citations. [Method/process] This paper reveals the difference of its system and consciousness based on a comparative study of patent citations from China and the USA. [Result/conclusion] On the description of the contents and position of reference, sorting standards, identification of element and the type of annotation are different between the patent citation of China and the USA. Therefore, the establishment of patent citation database and mining patent citation information should be distinguishedin order to improve the accuracy of patent citation analysis results, and more effectively achieve the value of patent citation.

参考文献

[1] Harry H C. Re:Citation system for patent office[J].Journal of the Patent Office Society,1949,31(9):714.
[2] Seidel A H. Citation system for patent office[J].Journal of the Patent Office Society,1949,31(7):554.
[3] Garfield E. Patent citation indexing and the notions of novelty, similarity, and relevance[J].Journal of Chemical Documentation,1966,6(2):63-65.
[4] 陈亮, 张志强, 尚玮姣. 专利引文分析方法研究进展[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2013, 29(7/8):75-81.
[5] Meyer M. What is special about patent citations? Differences between scientific and patent citations[J].Scientometrics,2000,49(1):93-123.
[6] WIPO. Standard ST.9:Bibliographic data on and relating to patents and SPCs[EB/OL].[2015-08-25].http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/standards/en/pdf/03-09-01.pdf.
[7] WIPO. Standard ST.14:References cited in patent documents[EB/OL].[2015-08-25]. http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/standards/en/pdf/03-14-01.pdf.
[8] USPTO. Advance notice of change to "references cited" on the front page of a patent[EB/OL].[2015-08-25].http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/sol/og/2000/week52/patrefr.htm.
[9] MPEP §609 information disclosure statement[EB/OL].[2015-08-25]. http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/s609.html.
[10] USPTO. MPEP §609.05(a) noncomplying information disclosure statements[EB/OL].[2015-08-25]. http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/s609.html.
[11] USPTO. Consolidated Patent Rules, 37 C.F.R §1.97 and 1.98(2015)[EB/OL].[2015-08-25].http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/s2666.html.
[12] USPTO. MPEP §1844 the international search report[EB/OL].[2015-08-25]. http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/s1844.html.
[13] Committee on WIPO standards(CWS):Fourth session[EB/OL].[2015-08-25]. http://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/cws/zh/cws_4/cws_4_5.pdf.
[14] USPTO. MPEP §708.02 petition to make special[EB/OL].[2015-08-25]. http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/s708.html.
[15] USPTO. MPEP §609 information disclosure statement[EB/OL].[2015-08-25].http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/s609.html.
[16] USPTO. MPEP §1302.12 listing of references[EB/OL].[2015-08-25]. http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/s1302.html.
[17] 汤艳莉. 各国专利文献中的引用文献比较[J]. 专利文献研究, 2007(3):4-18.

文章导航

/