工作研究

互联网思维下的在线课堂设计要素分析——以“数据分析”课程为例

  • 刘禄 ,
  • 袁曦临 ,
  • 刘利
展开
  • 1. 东南大学情报科技研究所 南京 210096;
    2. 东南大学图书馆 南京 210096
刘禄(ORCID:0000-0002-1417-4891),硕士研究生;刘利(ORCID:0000-0003-4022-1185),副研究馆员,硕士生导师。

收稿日期: 2015-08-21

  修回日期: 2015-09-17

  网络出版日期: 2015-10-05

基金资助

本文系国家社会科学基金一般项目"数字阅读机制与导读策略研究"(项目编号:13BTQ023)和江苏省教育科学"十二五"规划课题"基于知识地图的大学专业课程资源组织与网站开发研究"(项目编号:D/2013/01/037)研究成果之一。

Analysis on Design Factors of Online Class with Internet Thinking:Taking the Course "Data Analysis" for Example

  • Liu Lu ,
  • Yuan Xilin ,
  • Liu Li
Expand
  • 1. Institution of Information Science & Technology, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096;
    2. Southeast University Library, Nanjing 210096

Received date: 2015-08-21

  Revised date: 2015-09-17

  Online published: 2015-10-05

摘要

[目的/意义] 旨在探究能够契合"网络一代"自主探究学习模式的在线课堂教学及课程设计方式。[方法/过程] 以"数据分析"课程为例,选取TED-Ed和中国大学视频公开课这两类具有代表性的在线课堂进行对比分析,调查发现互联网思维对于在线课堂的影响是深刻的。[结果/结论] 在面向"网络一代"的在线课堂设计中应以学生的需求为中心,以学生的学习为主体,围绕知识单元和主题,以扁平化方式组织教学资源,创建互动在线学习环境及符合其学习需要的课程内容和课程结构。

本文引用格式

刘禄 , 袁曦临 , 刘利 . 互联网思维下的在线课堂设计要素分析——以“数据分析”课程为例[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015 , 59(19) : 55 -61 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2015.19.007

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] This paper intends to investigate how to fit online class teaching and course design methods of "Netsters'" self-inquiry learning mode.[Method/process] Two types of representative online classes, TED-Ed and Chinese university video open classes, have been selected and compared, with "data analysis" course for example.[Result/conclusion] It has been discovered that internet thinking has had a deep influence on online classes in the investigation. Online class design should focus on students' needs and take students' study as the main part, revolve around knowledge units and subjects, and organize educational resources in the flat form, to create interactive online education environment and improve the teaching effective of online class.

参考文献

[1] 构建利用信息化手段扩大优质教育资源覆盖面有效机制的实施方案[EB/OL].[2015-08-02].http://www.moe.edu.cn/publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/moe/s3342/201412/179124.html.
[2] 沈敏."在线"教育改变大学[EB/OL].[2015-02-15].http://jjckb.xinhuanet.com/2013-07/26/content_457832.htm.
[3] Penn GSE study shows MOOCs have relatively few active users,with only a few persisting to course end[EB/OL].[2015-02-15].http://www.gse.upenn.edu/pressroom/press-releases/2013/12/penn-gse-study-shows-moocs-have-relatively-few-active-users-only-few-persisti.
[4] Allen I E,Seaman J.Changing course:Ten years of tracking online education in the United States[EB/OL].[2015-08-02].http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/changingcourse.pdf.
[5] Leep online learning[EB/OL].[2015-02-15].http://www.lis.illinois.edu/future-students/leep.
[6] Driscoll A,Thompson G.Can online courses deliver in-class results?:A comparison of student performance and satisfaction in an online versus a face-to-face introductory sociology course[J].Teaching Sociology,2012,40(4):312-331.
[7] Yang Yan,Cho Y J,Mathew S,et al.College student effort expenditure in online versus face-to-face courses the role of gender,team learning orientation,and sense of classroom community[J].Journal of Advanced Academics,2011,22(4):619-638.
[8] Knott J L.Online teaching and faculty learning:The role of hypermedia in online course design[D].East Lansing:Michigan State University,2015.
[9] 邹自德,李文斐,王学珍.开放教育"在校课堂"与"在线课堂"的实践探索[J].中国远程教育,2014(23):55-59.
[10] 孙大雷.在线课程设计评价体系探究[J].价值工程,2013(3):211-212.
[11] 赵大伟.互联网思维之"独孤九剑"[J].科学之友(上半月),2014(5):13-15.
[12] 泰普斯科特.数字化成长3.0[M].云帆,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2009:69-72.
[13] Peet L.Pew:Millennials and libraries report examines millennial engagement,reading[J].Library Journal,2014,139(17):19-20.
[14] visualizing-data[EB/OL].[2015-02-15].http://ed.ted.com/series/visualizing-data.
[15] 开启智慧的大数据[EB/OL].[2015-02-15].http://open.163.com/special/cuvocw/kaiqizhihuidedashuju.html.
[16] 顾明远.教育大辞典[M].增订合编本上.上海:上海教育出版社,1998:1697.
[17] TED-Ed Tour[EB/OL].[2015-02-15].http://ed.ted.com/tour.
[18] 王妍,马弋飞.网络社区传播:美国TED品牌推广策略的启示[J].记者摇篮,2012(4):73-74.

文章导航

/

〈 〉