收稿日期: 2015-09-01
修回日期: 2015-09-22
网络出版日期: 2015-10-05
基金资助
本文系国家自然科学基金"开放数据下公共信息资源再利用体系的重构研究"(项目编号:71373195)研究成果之一。
Comparison and Analysis on the Open Government Data Assessment Methods of International Organizations
Received date: 2015-09-01
Revised date: 2015-09-22
Online published: 2015-10-05
[目的/意义] 开放政府数据评估是开放政府数据的重要组成部分,目前正处于起步发展阶段,需要逐步形成一套科学适用的评估体系。[方法/过程] 通过桌面调查和对比分析,针对当前国际组织部分代表性开放政府数据评估项目的实施,着重从评估方法、评估对象以及指标体系与评估效果等角度分析不同评估项目的实际运行状况。[结果/结论] 归纳和总结各类开放政府数据评估项目的特色与不足,发现国际组织开放政府数据评估的一些规律性做法,如第三方评估保证了评估的客观公正,评估指标体系设计围绕主题科学制定,以数据开放为核心,注重评估方法的整体优化以及重视评估信息采集与处理的信度与效度等。
夏义堃 . 国际组织开放政府数据评估方法的比较与分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015 , 59(19) : 75 -83 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2015.19.010
[Purpose/significance] Open government data assessment is an important part of the system of open government data, which is developing in the initial stage of exploration and needs to form a useful scientific evaluation framework.[Method/process] Beginning with the analysis on the typical current assessment programs in the fields of open government data of international organizations by means of desktop survey and comparative analysis, this paper focuses on the different features which are summarized in all kinds of open data programs from the point of assessment methods, objects, metrics and benefits.[Result/conclusion] Meanwhile, it sums up the characteristics and shortcomings of various open government data assessment programs and finds some rules of open government data assessment of the international organizations, such as that the third party assessment can ensure the objective and fair of results, index system design should focus on the development of subjects or disciplines and centers on data open, pay more attention to the overall optimization of assessment methods, and lay emphasis on the reliability and validity of collecting and processing information.
[1] Division for public administration and development management(DPADM), UN department of economic and social affairs(UNDESA). How can we benchmark Open Government/Open Government Data?[EB/OL].[2015-06-30].http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un-dpadm/unpan050405.pdf.
[2] OECD. Government at a Glance 2015[M/OL]. Paris:OECD Publishing.[2015-06-30]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/gov_glance-2015-48-en.
[3] World Bank's Open Government Data Working Group. Part a:Open data readiness assessment users' guide[EB/OL].[2015-08-01].http://opendatatoolkit.worldbank.org/docs/odra/.
[4] Davies T. Open Data Barometer[EB/OL].[2015-07-09]. http://www.opendataresearch.org/dl/odb-2013/Open-Data-Barometer-2013-Global-Report.pdf.
[5] Open Data Index All datasets/2014[EB/OL].[2015-08-12].http://index.okfn.org/.
[6] 89%的关键性数据集并未得以开放[EB/OL].[2015-08-20].http://index.okfn.org/static/images/press/2014/OpenDataIceberg-mandarin.png.
[7] European PSI scoreboard[EB/OL].[2015-08-21].www.epsiplatform.eu/content/european-psi-scoreboard.
[8] [2015-08-23.]http://project.opendatamonitor.eu/.
[9] Harper J. Grading the Government's Data Publication Practices[EB/OL].[2015-08-25].http://object.cato. org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/PA711.pdf.
[10] Garcia A A. Methodology for Releasing Free Data(MELODA)[EB/OL].[2015-08-29].http://melo-da.org/index.php/meloda/category/1-meloda.
[11] The Arachnys Open Data Compass.[2015-09-05].https://compass.arachnys.com/.
[12] Waseda University and International Academy of CIO(IAC). WASEDA-IAC 10th International E-Government Ranking 2014[EB/OL].[2015-09-06].http://e-gov.waseda.ac.jp/pdf/2014_E-Gov_Press_Release.pdf.
[13] World Wide Web Foundation. 2011. Open Government Data Feasibility Studies[EB/OL].[2015-09-08].http://webfoundation.org/our-work/projects/open-government-data-feasibility-studies.
[14] Tinholt D. The Open data economy:Unlocking economic value by opening government and public data[EB/OL].[2015-09-11].https://www.capgemini-consulting.com/resource-file-access/resource/pdf/opendata_pov_6feb.pdf.
[15] World Bank's Open Government Data Working Group. Open Data Readiness Assessment-Part B:Methodology[EB/OL].[2015-09-02].http://opendatatoolkit.worldbank.org/docs/odra/.
[16] Weiskopf Nicole G, Weng Chunhua. Methods and dimensions of electronic health record data quality assessment:Enabling reuse for clinical research[J/OL].[2015-09-13]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3555312.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
