收稿日期: 2015-09-09
修回日期: 2015-10-24
网络出版日期: 2015-11-20
基金资助
本文系教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目"复杂网络视角下的科学共同体研究"(项目编号:14YJC870028)和江苏省教育厅2012年度高校"青蓝工程"优秀青年骨干教师培养对象资助项目研究成果之一。
Study on Scholastic Correlation Model Based on Co-Author & Co-Citation and a Case Study
Received date: 2015-09-09
Revised date: 2015-10-24
Online published: 2015-11-20
[目的/意义] 通过对科研群体中学者之间的关联度进行研究,建立一种新的关联度计算模型,为深入分析学者间的关系提供更多视角。[方法/过程] 在对已有学者关联度表示方法进行总结的基础之上,将传统研究中的学者间合著关系与文献引用关系进行集成,构建基于合著与共引关系的学者关联度模型。实证部分以图书情报领域17种期刊10余年的文献数据以及引文数据为例,详细阐述基于该模型的复杂网络构建过程,并对该复杂网络的应用价值进行论述。[结果/结论] 实证数据表明,该关联度计算模型具有可应用性,构建的网络很好地将有向图与无向图进行了统一,不仅能够反映合著关系也能够体现相互间的共引关系,为深入分析学者间的关联提供数据基础,也能为知识服务和政策制定提供有益的参考。
朱云霞 . 基于合著与共引关系的学者关联度模型及实证研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015 , 59(22) : 97 -104 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2015.22.015
[Purpose/significance] Studying the correlation among scholars in research groups, this article builds a new correlation model to provide more views for further analysis of scholastic correlation model.[Method/process] This article summarizes the existing research achievement, and then integrates the co-author relationships and references relationships in traditional study to construct a new scholastic correlation model based on co-author and co-citation. In the case study, this article takes the published literature and citation data from 17 journals for more than ten years in library and information science for example, introduces how to build the complex network based on the model in detail, and discusses the application value of the complex network.[Result/conclusion] The empirical data shows that the correlation calculation model has applicability. This model unified directed graph and undirected graph as one. It can not only reflect the co-author relationships, but also reflect mutual relations. It can provide a data basis for in-depth analysis of scholars and beneficial reference for knowledge service and policy making.
Key words： correlation; co-author; co-citation; complex network
[1] 朱云霞,魏建香.我国高校社会科学领域科研合作网络分析[J].情报科学,2014(3):144-149.
[2] 李亮,朱庆华.社会网络分析方法在合著分析中的实证研究[J].情报科学,2008,26(4):549-555.
[3] 姚啸华.社会网络分析法在图情机构内部合著网络的实证研究[J].现代情报,2011,31(7):51-54.
[4] 邱均平,王菲菲.基于SNA的国内竞争情报领域作者合作关系研究[J].图书馆论坛,2010,30(6):34-40.
[5] 余丰民,汤建民.情报学领域较大规模合著网络的可视化识别及其形成机制研究[J].情报理论与实践,2011,34(8):41-46.
[6] 沈耕宇,黄水清,王东波.以作者合作共现为源数据的科研团队发掘方法研究[J].现代图书情报技术,2013(1):57-62.
[7] 孙丽娟.科技论文作者署名排序与通讯作者[J].中国科技期刊研究,2005,16(2):242-244.
[8] 苏新宁,朱云霞.面向知识服务的引文索引数据组织研究(Ⅰ)——引用数据特征及其作用分析[J].图书与情报,2013(5):1-5.
[9] Small H. Co-citation in the scientific literature:A new measure of the relationship between two documents[J].Journal of American Society for Information Science,1973,24(7):256-269.
[10] 宫雪,崔雷.利用不同类型引文探测研究前沿及比较研究[J].中华医学图书情报杂志,2010,19(4):8-10.
[11] 孙海生.作者关键词共现网络及实证研究[J].情报杂志,2012,31(9):63-67.
[12] 魏瑞斌.社会网络分析在关键词网络分析中的实证研究[J].情报杂志,2009,28(9):46-49.
[13] 彭陶,王建冬,孙慧明.基于关键词共现网络的我国图情领域近三十年学科发展脉络分析[J]. 大学图书馆学报,2012(2):29-34.
[14] 李一平,刘细文.科学共同体文献计量学特征研究[J].图书情报工作,2014,58(9):62-68.
[15] Börner K, Dall'Asta L, Ke Weimao, et al. Studying the emerging global brain: Analyzing and visualizing the impact of co-authorship teams[J]. Complexity, 2005, 10(4): 57-67.
[16] 朱云霞.中文文献题录数据作者重名消解问题研究[J].图书情报工作,2014,58(23): 143-148,142.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
