收稿日期: 2015-11-06
修回日期: 2015-12-09
网络出版日期: 2016-01-05
基金资助
本文系国家社会科学基金项目"多叙词表的开放关联与映射方法研究"(项目编号:14CTQ002)和西北大学教学改革项目(项目编号:JX13067)研究成果之一。
Research Type,Social Effect and Academic Competence:A Content Analysis of Highly Cited Papers in Library and Information Science
Received date: 2015-11-06
Revised date: 2015-12-09
Online published: 2016-01-05
[目的/意义]学术竞争力被普遍认为是衡量学科可持续发展的关键要素;通过图书情报学(简称"图情")高被引论文的内容结构特征阐释图情学术竞争力不足的影响因素并揭示其成因。[方法/过程]融合社会分层理论、市场效率理论和资源基础理论提出学术竞争力模型,构建"体裁-学术规范-社会效应"内容分析框架,利用中国知网全文数据库图情重点期刊2009-2013年80篇高被引论文、6552条引文开展内容分析。[结果/结论]高被引论文之报导型、基础型、应用型和综述型的体裁分布依次为78.8%、3.75%、10%和7.5%,且报导型以图书馆职业研究为主;高被引论文职业实践效应明显,基础社会效应相对不足。上述发现表明,图情学科学术竞争力不足跟论文的体裁结构和社会效应水平紧密相关,职业化是导致学术竞争力不足的根源。因此,就教育层面而言,推进学科转型是一条必由之路。
陶俊 . 体裁、社会效应与学术竞争力——图书情报学科高被引论文内容结构考察[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016 , 60(1) : 56 -65 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2016.01.009
[Purpose/significance] This paper gives an interpretation about the lack of academic competence in library and information science in China by an extensive domain analysis of the discipline in terms of its highly cited papers.[Method/process] Papers of those most frequently cited in key journals from 2009 to 2013 were retrieved via CNKI.6552 citations of the top 80 highly cited papers were submitted to the content encoding framework "research type-academic rule-social effect" by the academic competence model.[Result/conclusion] The results show that the report type, which is given priority to with library practice, accounts for 78.8%;however, the basic, applied and review types account for 3.75%, 10% and 7.5%.Meanwhile, the content of samples is outstanding in professional practice effect, but it has relative shortage of contribution in basic social effect.Findings above conclude that academic competence is closely related to thestructure of the research type and the social effect, and professional orientation is the root of lack of academic competence.Therefore, in terms of education, promoting the discipline reform is necessary.
[1] 张晓林.应该转变图书馆研究的方向[J].图书馆学通讯,1985(3):57-65.
[2] 苏新宁.提升图书情报学学科地位的思考——基于CSSCI的实证分析[J].中国图书馆学报,2010(4):47-53.
[3] 于鸣镝.中国图书馆学的学科地位何以低下?[J].图书馆杂志,2003(11):16-18.
[4] 金武刚.图书馆学的"有为""无位"困境研究——兼论图书馆学的学术营销[J].图书与情报,2007(3):25-31.
[5] 叶继元.图书情报与档案管理学科未来五年重点研究领域与选题——《高校哲学社会科学管理学部图书情报与档案管理学科战略规划研究报告》解读[J].中国图书馆学报,2012(1):105-112.
[6] 赵星,谭旻,余小萍等.我国文科领域知识扩散之引文网络探析[J].中国图书馆学报,2012(5):59-67.
[7] 刘宇,叶继元,袁曦临.实证缺失的中国图书馆学研究[J].中国图书馆学报,2009(4):20-24,30.
[8] 张力,唐健辉,刘永涛,等.中外图书情报学研究方法量化比较[J].中国图书馆学报,2012(2):21-27.
[9] POPENOE D.Sociology[M].11th ed.New York:Pearson Education,Inc,2000:192-193.
[10] SAMUELSON P A,NORDHAUS W D.Economics[M].19th ed.New York:The McGraw-Hill Company,2010:3-5.
[11] BARNEY J B.Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage[J].Journal of management,1991,17(1):99-120.
[12] 陶俊,王传清.信息管理学科整合的变革路径研究[J].图书情报工作,2014,58(14):40-48.
[13] 白君礼.图书馆学研究中问题意识摭拾[J].中国图书馆学报,2012(5):115-125.
[14] 肖希明.图书馆学研究要以问题为导向[J].图书馆,2005(1):39-42.
[15] 邱伍芳.中国图书馆学应进一步弘扬实证研究[J].中国图书馆学报,2008(1):16-21.
[16] 徐建华,李超.莫让规范化的实证研究在当今图书馆学研究中缺位——"当代图书馆员快乐指数"研究的启示[C]//第五次全国图书馆学基础理论研讨会.重庆,2007.
[17] 张晓林.与时俱进让学科之树常青[J].图书情报工作,2003,47(3):7-9.
[18] 黄红华,周佳贵.图书馆学理论的使命与担当——第六次全国图书馆学基础理论研讨会综述[J].中国图书馆学报,2012(3):51-56.
[19] 苏新宁.图书馆、情报与文献学学术影响力研究报告(2000-2004)——基于CSSCI的分析[J].情报学报,2006,25(2):131-153.
[20] WALTERS W H,WILDER E I.Disciplinary,national,and departmental contributions to the literature of library and information science,2007-2012(in press)[J/OL].Journal of the association for information science and technology,2016.[2015-12-08].http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.23448//full.
[21] WATSON P D.Production of scholaryly articles by academic librarians and library school faculty[J].College & research libraries,1985,46(4):334-342.
[22] FINLAY S C,NI C,TSOU A,et al.Publish or practice? An examination of librarians' contributions to research[J].Portal:libraries and the academy,2013,13(4):403-421.
[23] WIBERLEY S E,HURD J M,WELLER A C.Publication patterns of U.S.academic librarians from 1998 to 2002[J].College & research libraries,2006,67(3):205-215.
[24] SCHLÖGL C,PETSCHNIG W.Library and information science journals:an editor survey[J].Library collections,acquisitions,& technical services,2005,29(1):4-32.
[25] NISONGER T,DACIS C.The perception of library and information science journals by LIS education deans and ARL library directors:a replication of the kohl-davis study[J].College & research libraries,2005,66(4):341-377.
[26] MANZARI L.Library and information science journal prestige as assessed by library and information science faculty[J].Library quarterly,2013,83(1):42-60.
[27] BLESSINGER K,FRASIER M.Analysis of a decade in library literature:1994-2004[J].College & research libraries,2007,68(2):155-170.
[28] YAN E.Research dynamics,impact,and dissemination:a topic-level analysis[J/OL].Journal of the association for information science and technology,2015,66(11):2357-2372.[2015-12-18].http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.23324/full.
[29] ASTRÖM F.Changes in the LIS research front:time-sliced cocitation analyses of LIS journal articles,1990-2004[J].Journal of the american society for information science and technology,2007,58(7):947-957.
[30] YAN E.Research dynamics:measuring the continuity and popularity of research topics[J].Journal of informetrics,2014,8(1):98-110.
[31] WHITER H D,MCCAIN K W.Visualizing a discipline:an author co-citation analysis of information science,1972-1995[J].Journal of the american society for information science,1998,49(4):327-355.
[32] LEYDESDORFF L,VAUGHAN L.Co-occurrence matrices and their applications in information science:extending ACA to the Web environment[J].Journal of the american society for information science and technology,2006,57(12):1616-1628.
[33] CHEN C.Predictive effects of structural variation on citation counts[J].Journal of the american society for information science and technology,2012,63(3):431-449.
[34] DU Y.A review of structural equation modeling and its use in library and information studies[J].Library & information science research,2009,31(4):257-263.
[35] SUGIMOTO C R,LI D,G.RUSSELL T,et al.The shifting sands of disciplinary development:analyzing north american library and information science dissertations using latent Dirichlet allocation[J].Journal of the american society for information science and technology,2011,62(1):185-204.
[36] CHU H.Research methods in library and information science:a content analysis[J].Library & information science research,2015,37(1):36-41.
[37] FETHER J.LIS reasearch in the united kingdom:reflections and prospects[J].Journal of librarianship and information science,2009,41(3):173-181.
[38] 巴比.社会研究方法[M].11版.邱泽奇,译.北京:华夏出版社,2009:6.
[39] 马庆国.管理科学研究方法与研究生学位论文的评判参考标准[J].管理世界,2004(12):99-108,145.
[40] 米勒,萨尔金德.研究设计与社会测量导引[M].风笑天,译.重庆:重庆大学出版社,2004:2-8.
[41] ONODERA N,YOSHIKANE F.Factors affecting citation rates of research articles[J].Journal of the association for information science and technology,2015,66(4):739-764.
[42] 陈昭全,张志学,WHETTEN D.管理研究中的理论建构[M]//组织与管理研究的实证方法.2版.北京:北京大学出版社,2012:63-95.
[43] 中国图书馆学会,国家图书馆.中国图书馆年鉴2014[M].北京:国家图书馆出版社,2015:201,435.
[44] REICHEL W M M.Publish or perish:a dilemma for academic librarians?[J].College & research libraries,1999,60(3):321-329.
[45] 陶俊.信息管理一级学科的变革路径研究[J].图书情报工作,2013,57(9):5-12.
[46] 程焕文.高涨的事业与低落的教育——关于图书馆学教育逆向发展的思考[J].中国图书馆学报,2001(1):67-70.
[47] 肖希明,司莉,黄如花.我国图书馆学教育发展现状的调查分析[J].图书情报知识,2008(1):5-10,16.
[48] VANHOUSE N A,SUTTON S A.The panda syndrome:an ecology of LIS education[J].Journal of education for library and information science,1996,37(2):131-147.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
