理论研究

网络经营者收集与传输个人数据的中外法律规范比较

  • 相丽玲 ,
  • 王景辉
展开
  • 山西大学经济与管理学院 太原 030006
相丽玲,教授,博士,博士生导师。

收稿日期: 2015-12-21

  修回日期: 2016-02-07

  网络出版日期: 2016-02-20

基金资助

本文系国家社会科学基金项目"信息支援的法律制度研究"(项目编号:12BTQ035)研究成果之一。

Comparison of the Domestic and Overseas Legal Norms of Personal Data Collection and Transmission by Network Operators

  • Xiang Liling ,
  • Wang Jinghui
Expand
  • School of Economics and Management, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006

Received date: 2015-12-21

  Revised date: 2016-02-07

  Online published: 2016-02-20

摘要

[目的/意义] 对中外网络经营者收集与传输个人数据行为的法律规范进行对比分析,以期发现我国目前法律规范中存在的具体问题并借鉴先进法律规范经验提出完善建议,从而有效解决我国网络经营者收集与传输个人数据行为日益凸显的问题。[方法/过程] 采用比较研究的方法对主要国际组织与国家现行相关法律规范进行梳理与比较,从立法原则、法定义务、法律责任以及特殊用户(即儿童)4个方面,分析对网络经营者收集与传输个人数据行为进行法律规范的异同。[结果/结论] 通过比较分析指出我国现行相关法律规范存在着法律规范宽泛笼统、个人数据主体维权困难、缺乏专门监管机构等主要问题,借鉴先进的国外立法经验提出相应的改进建议,对我国相关立法的研究与完善具有一定意义。

本文引用格式

相丽玲 , 王景辉 . 网络经营者收集与传输个人数据的中外法律规范比较[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016 , 60(4) : 21 -28 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2016.04.003

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] This paper contrasts and analyzes the domestic and overseas legal norms of network operators collecting and transmitting personal data behavior. It aims to find out the specific problems in China's legal norms and make some suggestions by drawing lessons from the advanced legal norms for solving the increasingly fierce issues of network operators collecting and transmitting personal data behavior in China. [Method/process] Using the comparative approach,we sort out and compare the commons and differences among international organizations and current national legal norms from the aspects of legislation principles,legal obligations,accountabilities and special users(children users). [Result/conclusion] Through the comparative analysis above, it points out that China's currentrelative legal norms have main issues. Legal norms are too general, and it is difficult to protect the legal rights and legal norms lackthe specialized regulatory agencies, and learning lessons from foreign advanced experience to make recommendations for improvement. It's meaningful for the China's relevant legal studies and improvement.

参考文献

[1] 朱力宇.法理学原理与案例教程[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2010:47-58.
[2] 王忠. 大数据时代个人数据隐私规制[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2014:101-116.
[3] 齐爱民. 个人资料保护法原理及其跨国流通法律问题研究[M]. 武汉:武汉大学出版社,2004:145-148.
[4] 2011 Web economic forum the report: personal data, the emergence of a new asset class[EB/OL].[2015-09-20]. http://www.weforum.org/reports/personal-data-emergence-new-asset-class.
[5] MIKKONEN T. Perceptions of controllers on EU data protection reform: a Finnish perspective[J]. Computer law & security review, 2014, 30(2):190-195.
[6] EU COMMISSION. First report on the implementation of the data protection directive (95/46/EC)[EB/OL].[2015-10-25]. http://aei.pitt.edu/45392/.
[7] CATE F H.美国的隐私保护[M] //周汉华.个人信息保护前沿问题研究.北京:法律出版社,2006:73-104.
[8] 蒋坡. 个人数据信息的法律保护[M]. 北京:中国政府大学出版社,2008:352-361.
[9] 牟凡.中美电子商务消费者信息隐私权保护制度比较研究[D].南京:南京大学,2012.
[10] 张鸿霞,郑宁. 网络环境下隐私权的法律保护研究[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2013:160-162. 作者贡献说明: 相丽玲:提出研究思路,设计研究方案,负责最终版本修正; 王景辉:负责文献资料的获取、提供与分析,起草论文。

文章导航

/

〈 〉