收稿日期: 2016-01-13
修回日期: 2016-02-25
网络出版日期: 2016-03-05
基金资助
本文系国家社会科学基金项目"学术创新扩散过程及创新力测度研究"(项目编号:15CTQ027)研究成果之一。
Study on Innovation Power Evaluation Index of Scientific Research Achievements:Design and Demonstration of S Index
Received date: 2016-01-13
Revised date: 2016-02-25
Online published: 2016-03-05
[目的/意义]探讨成果创新力指标设计原则、原理,提出相应指数并进行实证研究,为科研评价体系中创新力评价维度的确立提供理论与指标参考。[方法/过程]首先,结合经典指标的设计经验、科研评价领域的最新进展以及库恩范式转换理论,明确成果创新力指标的设计原则。其次,通过对科学发展过程、科研创新产生与扩散机制等的研究,说明成果创新力指标的设计原理。在此基础上,提出S指数及累加S指数的计算公式。最后,进行指数计算、与影响力指数的对比分析、不同扩散阶段的精细评价及成果创新力分区等实证分析。[结果/结论]讨论S指数可靠性,总结指数特性、用途和使用注意事项,并对其在创新扩散现象与规律研究、促进学术规范、确立科研评价体系创新维度中能够起到的作用做出展望。
宋歌 . 科研成果创新力指标S指数的设计与实证[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016 , 60(5) : 77 -86,124 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2016.05.012
[Purpose/significance] Through the discussion on design principle of innovation power index to achievements, and the proposing and demonstrating of corresponding index, the theory and reference for the establishment of innovation power evaluation dimension in scientific research evaluation system is provided.[Method/process] Firstly, combined the design experience of classical index, the latest development of research evaluation field, and the paradigm shift theory of Kuhn, the design principles of the innovation power indexes are cleared. Secondly, through the analysis on scientific development process, scientific research innovation and diffusion mechanism and other research, the design principle of the innovation power indexes is elaborated. On the basis of the above, S index and its formula of accumulated S index are put forward. Empirical research includes the calculation of the index, the correlation analysis with the impact index, the fine evaluation at different diffusion stages and the partition of research results.[Result/conclusion] The reliability of S index, the characteristics of index, the application and the use of attention are summarized. This paper proposes the research prospects of S index on studying the phenomenon and law of innovation diffusion, promoting the academic norms, and establishing the innovation dimensionality of scientific research evaluation system.
[1] 沈律. 科技创新的一般均衡理论[J].科学学研究,2003(2):205-209.
[2] 任全娥. 基于情报学的人文社会科学研究成果创新性测评[J].情报资料工作,2009(2):20-23.
[3] 杨家栋,秦兴方. 社会科学研究成果的评价及其指标体系[J].齐鲁学刊,2001(2):122-128.
[4] KOSMULSKI M. Successful papers:a new idea in evaluation of scientific output[J]. Journal of informetrics, 2011(5):481-485.
[5] Elsevier. Response to HEFCE's call for evidence:independent review of the role of metrics in research assessment[EB/OL].[2015-09-11]. https://www.elsevier.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/53416/Elsevier-response-HEFCE-review-role-of-metrics.pdf.
[6] 武夷山."爱思唯尔宣言"中关于评价指标的12条原则[EB/OL].[2015-09-06]. http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-1557-845279.html.
[7] KUHN T S. The structure of scientific revolutions[M]. 3rd ed. Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 1996:52.
[8] GARFIELD E, WELLJAMSDOROF A. Of nobel class-a citation perspective on high-impact research authors[J]. Theoretical medicine, 1992, 13(2):117-135.
[9] van RAAN A F J. Sleeping beauties in science[J]. Scientometrics, 2004, 59(3):467-472.
[10] MAYER R E. The search for insight:grappling with Gestalt Psychology's unanswered questions[C]//STERMBERG R J, DAVIDSON J E. The nature of insight. Cambridge:The MIT Press, 1995:3-32.
[11] 克兰. 无形学院——知识在科学共同体的扩散[M].刘珺珺,顾昕,王德禄,译.北京:华夏出版社,1988:31.
[12] CHEB C. Turning points:the nature of creativity[M]. Beijing:Higher Education Press, 2011:102.
[13] CHEN C. CiteSpace Ⅱ:detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2006, 57(3):359-377.
[14] 宋歌. 网络结构视域下的创新潜力指标研究[J].图书情报工作,2014(3):64-71.
[15] 庞景安.科学计量研究方法论[M].北京:科学技术文献出版社,2002:318.
[16] PIROLLI P. Information foraging theory:adaptive interaction with information[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press, 2007:14-16.
[17] GLANZEL W, GARFIELD E. The myth of delayed recognition[J]. Scientist, 2004, 18(11):8-9.
[18] 冯平.评价论[M]. 北京:东方出版社,1997:109.
[19] 罗杰斯.创新的扩散[M].辛欣,译.北京:中央编译出版社,2002:298.
[20] 宋歌. 学术创新的扩散过程研究[J].中国图书馆学报, 2015(1):62-75.
[21] The San Francisco declaration on research assessment. Putting science into the assessment of research[EB/OL].[2015-09-28]. http://am.ascb.org/dora/.
[22] 旧金山科研评价宣言小组. 关于科研评价的旧金山宣言——让科研评价更加科学[EB/OL].[2015-09-28]. http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-335532-758739.html.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
