工作研究

科学数据开放中数据中心政策分析与建议

  • 崔雁
展开
  • 1. 北京交通大学图书馆 北京 100044;
    2. 中国科学院文献情报中心 北京 100190
崔雁(ORCID:0000-0002-2577-573X),馆员,博士研究生,E-mail:ycui@bjtu.edu.cn。

收稿日期: 2016-04-05

  修回日期: 2016-04-10

  网络出版日期: 2016-04-20

Policy Analysis and Recommendations on Data Center in the Process of Openly Sharing Scientific Data

  • Cui Yan
Expand
  • 1. Beijing Jiaotong University Library, Beijing 100044;
    2. National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190

Received date: 2016-04-05

  Revised date: 2016-04-10

  Online published: 2016-04-20

摘要

[目的/意义] 在科学数据的开放共享体系中,数据中心是关键利益相关者。对科学数据中心发展的现状、基本政策进行分析,并提出相关建议。[方法/过程] 利用re3data.org注册机制,从多角度分析科学数据中心,包括收录数据的类型、数据的获取方式、数据获取的限制条件、使用许可、元数据标准、永久标识符、质量管理、数据中心的认证等内容。[结果/结论] 在分析科学数据中心现有政策的基础上,为进一步推进科学数据的开放共享提出相关建议,包括推进科学数据的开放性、合理配置管理成本、有效评估科学数据质量等内容。

本文引用格式

崔雁 . 科学数据开放中数据中心政策分析与建议[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016 , 60(8) : 73 -78 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2016.08.008

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] Data centers are key stakeholders in the openly sharing scientific data. This study analyzes the current status and the basic policies of the data centers, and then provides some policy recommendations.[Method/process] Using re3data.org, this paper analyzes the distributions of data center, including content types, data access, data access restrictions, data licenses, metadata standards, permanent identifier systems, quality management, and certificates.[Result/conclusion] Based on the analysis of scientific data centers' policies, the study provides some recommendations, including promoting the openness of scientific data, reasonable allocation of administrative costs, effectively assessing the quality of scientific data and other contents.

参考文献

[1] European Commission. Recommendation on access to and preservation of scientific information[EB/OL].[2016-03-20].http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/recommendation-access-and-preservation-scientific-information_en.pdf.
[2] MARCIAL L H, HEMMINGER B M. Scientific data repositories on the Web:an initial survey[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2010,61(10):2029-2048.
[3] SUBER P. Open access[M].Cambridge:The MIT Press, 2012.
[4] PAMPEL H, VLERKANT P, SCHOLZE F, et al. Making research data repositories visible:the re3data.org registry[EB/OL].[2016-04-10]. http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0078080.
[5] CHOUDHURY G S. Case study in data curation at Johns Hopkins University[J]. Library trends, 2008, 57(2):211-220.
[6] WITT M. Institutional repositories and research data curation in a distributed environment[J]. Library trends, 2008, 57(2):191-201.
[7] 林业科学数据中心[EB/OL].[2016-04-10]. http://www.cfsdc.org/.
[8] 地球系统科学数据共享平台[EB/OL].[2016-04-10]. http://www.geodata.cn/.
[9] 人口与健康科学数据共享平台[EB/OL].[2016-04-10].http://www.ncmi.cn/1.
[10] 农业科学数据共享中心[EB/OL].[2016-04-10]. http://www.agridata.cn/.
[11] 地震科学数据共享中心[EB/OL].[2016-04-10]. http://data.earthquake.cn/.
[12] 中国气象数据网[EB/OL].[2016-04-10].http://data.cma.cn/.
[13] 聂华,韦成府,崔海媛. CALIS机构知识库:建设与推广、反思与展望[J]. 中国图书馆学报,2013,39(2):46-52.
[14] 张冬荣,祝忠明,李麟,等. 中国科学院机构知识库建设推广与服务[J]. 图书情报工作, 2013,57(1):20-25.
[15] re3data.org[EB/OL].[2016-04-10].http://service.re3data.org/.
[16] WDS Certification[EB/OL].[2016-04-10].http://www.icsu-wds.org/services/certification.
[17] Data seal of approval[EB/OL].[2016-04-10].http://www.datasealofapproval.org.
[18] DDI Alliance[EB/OL].[2016-04-10].http://www.ddialliance.org/.
[19] BEAGRIE N, LAVOIE B, WOOLLARD W. Keeping data safe(phase 2)[EB/OL].[2016-04-10].http://www.jisc.ac.uk/publications/reports/2010/keepingresearchdatasafe2.aspx#downloads.
[20] DALLMEIER-TIESSEN S, DARBY R, GITMANS K, et al. Compilation of results on drivers and barriers and new opportunities[EB/OL].[2016-04-10].http://www.alliancepermanentaccess.org/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2012/08/ODE-CompilationResultsDriversBarriersNewOpportunities1.pdf.
[21] RDNL. A federated data infrastructure for the Netherlands:the front-office-back-office model[EB/OL].[2016-04-10].http://www.researchdata.nl/fileadmin/content/RDNL_algemeen/Documenten/RDNL_FOBOmodel-UK-web.pdf.
[22] NOORMAN M, KALAITZI V, ANGELAKI M, et al. Institutional barriers and good practice solutions, RECODE D4.1[EB/OL].[2016-04-10].http://recodeproject.eu/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/RECODE-D4.1-Institutional-barriers-FINAL.pdf.
[23] DOBRATZ S, RODIG P, BORGHOFF U M, et al. The use of quality management standards in trustworthy digital archives[J].The international journal of digital curation, 2010, 1(5):46-63.
[24] Digital Curation Centre[EB/OL].[2016-04-10].http://www.dcc.ac.uk/.
文章导航

/