[目的/意义] 比较分析中日两国多项资助基金的关联特征,找出中国多项科技资助存在的问题,为科技基金规范管理的决策提供参考依据。[方法/过程] 以2014年SCI收录的中国内地和日本的多项科技基金资助论文为研究对象,利用社会网络分析方法,对中国内地和日本科技基金的关联分布、科技基金合作网络特征、主要关联基金的影响效果进行比较分析。[结果/结论] 中国内地的多项基金资助SCI论文中,92.8%有国家自然科学基金、国家部委基金及地方政府基金的关联资助;日本的多项资助SCI论文中,86.41%有国外基金、文部省基金、学术振兴会基金、企业基金、科学振兴机构基金、厚生省基金的关联资助。与日本相比,我国多项科技资助的来源比较单一,明确各类基金在科技资助体系中的分工,减少自然科学基金、各级政府基金的多项关联资助,吸引国外基金、企业基金、各类社会团体基金的共同资助将是我国科技基金的发展方向。

[Purpose/significance] This paper comparatively analyzes the associated features of Chinese and Japanese multi-scientific funds, and finds out the existing problems of Chinese multi-funds, to provide reference for standardizing the management decisions of multi-scientific funds.[Method/process] Choosing Chinese and Japanese funded scientific articles included by SCI in 2014 as the research object, it makes a comparative analysis on the associated distribution of two countries' scientific research funds, features of main cooperative networks and impact of main correlated funds with the method of social network analysis.[Result/conclusion] Among Chinese multi-funded scientific articles, 92.8% are mutually funded by national natural fund, national-state funds and local government's funds. 86.41% of Japanese multi-funded scientific papers are interrelated funded by funds of overseas, the Ministry of Education, JSPS, enterprises, JST and Ministry of Welfare.Compared with Japan, the sources of Chinese multi-scientific funds ate relatively single, so its development direction is to clarify the roles of various funds in science and technology system, reduce natural and governments' associated fund, and attract more mutual fund of overseas funds, enterprise funds and all kinds of social group funds.