图书情报工作

图书情报工作 >

2016 , Vol. 60 >Issue 12: 139 - 148

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2016.12.020

综述述评

图书馆学领域“网络一代”用户研究综述

  • 徐美凤 ,
  • 祝晓慧 ,
  • 安艳杰
展开
  • 南京财经大学图书馆 南京 210023
徐美凤(ORCID:0000-0002-4141-1135),副馆长,副教授,博士,E-mail:xumeifeng@njue.edu.cn;祝晓慧,馆员,硕士。安艳杰,副研究馆员,硕士

收稿日期: 2016-04-08

  修回日期: 2016-05-24

  网络出版日期: 2016-06-20

基金资助

本文系江苏省教育厅高校哲学社会科学研究项目“学术类虚拟社区知识共享多主体建模研究”项目编号：2012SJB87002研究成果之一。

收起

A Research Review on "Net Generation" Users in Library Science

  • Xu Meifeng ,
  • Zhu Xiaohui ,
  • An Yanjie
Expand
  • The Library of Nanjing University of Finance and Economics, Nanjing 210023

Received date: 2016-04-08

  Revised date: 2016-05-24

  Online published: 2016-06-20

Fold

摘要

[目的/意义] “网络一代”用户，是指在数字技术、网络技术背景下成长起来的用户群体。其图书馆使用行为有不同于以往用户的表现，对其进行研究有助于推动图书馆服务创新。[方法/过程] 利用LISA、CNKI两个数据库的检索结果，并结合引文等途径收集文献，从文献计量分析、内容分析两方面对国内外图书馆学领域关于“网络一代”用户的研究内容进行对比、综述。[结果/结论] 计量分析显示：从文献数量随时间分布来看，国内研究尽管相对滞后，但是目前研究文献量下降的状况与国外相似；关键词分析可见：国内外研究背景、主要研究主题相近，覆盖了技术应用、图书馆服务、用户教育等多方面，明显的区别在于国外研究重视学习理论、教育理论研究，国内则重视阅读理论与阅读推广；内容分析显示：“网络一代”用户的图书馆使用偏好变化以及基于用户特征的图书馆服务变革均是国内外研究者的关注热点，不同之处在于，国外研究者更重视基于样本和案例的分析，但与国内研究相比，缺乏理论指导和统一的分析框架。国内以定性研究居多，取样与案例分析不足。认为未来研究需要增加针对“网络一代”信息行为的切实调查，关注信息行为调查研究的理论框架设计。数字阅读相关的理论研究有利于提升对“网络一代”用户信息行为的理解与感知。

关键词： 网络一代; 图书馆用户; 用户行为; 图书馆变革

本文引用格式

徐美凤 , 祝晓慧 , 安艳杰 . 图书馆学领域“网络一代”用户研究综述[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016 , 60(12) : 139 -148 . DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2016.12.020

Abstract

[Purpose/significance] As the library users, Net Generations, who were born into the era of burgeoning digital technology and network technology, should be focused on for they have showed some behaviors different from the previous generations. The related research will help to promote the library service innovation.[Method/process] With the literatures from the two databases: LISA, CNKI, and some citation literatures from other databases, this study reviews the research on Net Generation patrons in Library Science based on bibliometrics analysis and content analysis.[Result/conclusion] According to the distribution of literature quatity over time, the domestic research has the same trend as the related foreign research, although there are much less literatures and some time lag in domestic research. With the keywords analysis, there are the same research topics between domestic and foreign research, such as technology application, library services, patron education, etc.. The obvious difference is that the domestic researchers focus on reading theory and reading promoting while the foreign researchers attach importance to learning and education theories. With the content analysis, both domestic and foreign searchers pay much attention on the preference change of Net Generation and the library reform based on this. Furthermore, foreign researchers pay more attention to case study but lack theory framework, while domestic researchers aim at qualitative study but lack investigation and case study. According to this paper, large scale survey, theory on user behavior and digital reading should be focused on in future.

Key words： Net Generation; library patron; user behavior; library reform

参考文献

[1] TAPSCOTTD D. Growing up digital:the rise of the net generation[M]. New York:McGraw Hill,1997.
[2] 李龙. 美国的网上一代[J]. 现代家教,1998(12):25-26.
[3] HOWEN N, STRAUSSW W. Millennials rising:the next great generation[M]. New York:Vintage,2000.
[4] ALLISON D A. The patron-driven library:a practical guide for managing collections and services in the digital age. Chandos information professional series[M]. UK:Chandos Publishing,2013.
[5] PEET L. ResearchPew:Millennials and Libraries libraries[J]. Library journal,2014, 139(77):19.
[6] LIPPINCOTT J K. Net generation students and libraries[J]. Educause review,2005, 40(2):56-66.
[7] SHEESLEY D. The ‘net generation’ characteristics of traditional-aged college students and implications for academic information services[J]. College and undergraduate libraries,2002, 9(2):25-42.
[8] SWEENEY R T. Reinventing library buildings and services for the millennial generation[J]. Library administration and management,2005, 19(4):165-175.
[9] BENNETT S K, MATONL K,KERVIN L.The ‘digital natives’ debate:a critical review of the evidence[J]. British journal of educational technology,2008, 39(5):775-786.
[10] 牛勇,杨青,满路.作为数字移民的高校图书馆信息素质教育者研究[J].四川图书馆学报,2013(6):73-75.
[11] PRENSKY M. Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1[J]. On the horizon,2001, 9(5):1-6.
[12] 李刚.现在与未来:关于"网上一代"的分析与思考[J].青年研究,1998(3):1-4.
[13] 柯平,陈雅茜. 面向y一代的大学图书馆用户服务[J].大学图书馆学报,2011(4):5-10,17.
[14] 王丽艳,黄溶冰. 面向"网络一代"的学习共享空间建设[J].现代情报,2014, 34(11):96-103
[15] ALTMAN E, PRATT A. Growing up digital:the rise of the net generation[J]. Journal of academic librarianship,1998, 24(4):343.
[16] CAYWOOD C. The net generation[J]. School library journal,1998, 44(10):59.
[17] GIBBONS S L. The academic library and the net gen student:Making the connections[M].Chicago:American Library Association,2007:91-94,96-97.
[18] OBLINGER D G, HAWKINS B L. The myth about students[J]. Educausereview,2005, 40(5):12-13.
[19] LIPPINCOTT J K. Net generation students & libraries[J]. Educause review,2005, 40(2):56-66.
[20] TAYLOR P, KEETER, S.Millennials:a portrait of generation next:confident, connected, open to change[EB/OL].[2015-11-20].http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1501/millennials_new_survey_generational_personality_upbeat_opennew_ideas_technology_bound.
[21] WILLIAMS P. The net generation:the experiences, attitudes and behaviour of children using the internet for their own purposes[J]. ASLIB proceedings,1999, 51(9):315-322.
[22] FRAND J L. The information-age mindset Changes in stuclents and implications for higher education[J]. Educause review,2000, 35(5):15-24.
[23] CONNAWAY L S, DICKEY T J, RADFORD M L. "If it is too inconvenient i'm not going after it:" convenience as a critical factor in information-seeking behaviors[J]. Library & information science research,2011, 33(3):179-190.
[24] BROWER S. Millennial in action:a student-guided effort in curriculum-integration of library skills[J]. Medical reference services quarterly,2004, 23(2):81-88.
[25] ZIMERMAN M. Digital natives, searching behavior and the library[J]. New library world,2012, 113(3-4):174-201.
[26] 王艳,周剑. 大学新生信息行为特征与图书馆入馆教育辨析[J]. 图书馆杂志,2015(12):44-49.
[27] 黄文忠. 网络环境下大学生图书馆信息行为实证研究——以广州大学为例[J]. 广州大学学报:社会科学版,2014, 13(7):66-71.
[28] 艾瑞咨询. 2014年中国数字阅读用户行为研究报告[EB/OL].[2016-01-20].http://report.iresearch.cn/2210.html.
[29] 中国互联网络信息中心第35次中国互联网络发展状况统计报告[EB/OL].[2016-02-20].http://www.cnnic.net.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/hlwtjbg/201502/t20150203_51634.htm,2015:32.
[30] COSTELLO D. Grazing, looping, and skimming:understanding students' digital habits[J]. Internet@Schools,2015, 22(1):7-9.
[31] KOH K, DRESANG E. Modeling and assessing radical change youth information behavior in the digital age:a pilot study[J]. Proceedings of the american society for information science & technology,2009, 46(1):1-7.
[32] DUKE J. Pew issues report on young americans, public libraries[J]. Advanced technology libraries,2014, 43(10):9-10.
[33] 秦超,谢非. 数字阅读与纸质阅读的对比调查研究[J]. 情报探索,2011(10):17-20.
[34] TAYLOR A.A study of the information search behaviour of the millennial generation[J].Information research:an intermational electronic journal,2012,17(1):1.
[35] GROSS M, LATHAM D. Undergraduate perceptions of information literacy:Defining, attaining, and self-assessing skills[J]. College & research libraries,2009, 70(4):336-350.
[36] HARGITTAI E. Digital natives? variation in internet skills and uses among members of the "net generation"[J]. Sociological inquiry,2010, 80(1):92-113.
[37] ALLISON D A. The patron-driven library:a practical guide for managing collections and services in the digital age[M]. UK:Chandos Publishing, 2013.
[38] O'CONNOR L, LUNDSTROM K. The impact of social marketing strategies on the information seeking behaviors of college students[J]. Reference &user services quarterly,2011:351-365.
[39] LIPPINCOTT J K. Information commons:meeting millennials' needs[J]. Journal of library administration,2010, 50(1):27-37.
[40] TENOFSK Y D.Teaching to the whole student:building best practices for collaboration between libraries and student services.in,2005,20(4):284-299.
[41] GLOGOFF S. Information technology in the virtual library:leadership in times of change[J]. Journal of library administration,2001, 32(3/4):59-80.
[42] BECKERB W. Advances in technology and library space[J]. Behavioral & social sciences librarian,2015, 34(1):41-44.
[43] RETTIG J.Technology, cluelessness, anthropology, and the memex:the future of academic reference service[J]. Reference services review,2003, 31(1):17-21.
[44] COSTELLO B,LENHOLT R, STRYKER J. Using blackboard in library instruction:addressing the learning styles of generations x and y[J]. Journal of academic librarianship,2004, 30(6):452-460.
[45] RUSH L,Stott R. Minute to learn it:integrating one-minute videos into information literacy programming[J]. Internet reference services quarterly,2014, 19(3/4):219-232.
[46] CLAPP M J, EEING S R. Using students to make instructional videos:report of an initial experiment[J]. Reference librarian,2013, 54(4):332-340.
[47] 张晓林,许旭. 让数字图书馆驱动图书馆服务创新发展——读《国际图联数字图书馆宣言》有感[J]. 中国图书馆学报,2010(3):73-76.
[48] BLADEK M, OKAMOTO K. What's theory got to do with it? Applying educational theory and research to revamp freshman library workshops[J]. College & undergraduate libraries,2014, 21(1):19-36.
[49] HARLEY B, DREGER M,KNOBLOCH P. The postmodern condition:students, the web, and academic library services[J]. Reference services review,2001, 29(1):23-32.
[50] SMITH S D,GALBRAITH Q. Motivating millennials:improving practices in recruiting, retaining, and motivating younger library staff[J]. Journal of academic librarianship,2012, 38(3):135-144.
[51] LIPPINCOTT J K. Information commons:meeting millennials' needs[J]. Journal of library administration,2012, 52(6/7):538-548.
[52] HEITSCH E K, HOLLEY R P. The information and learning commons:some reflections[J]. New review of academic librarianship,2011, 17(1):64-77.
[53] GAYTON J T. Academic libraries:"social" or "communal?" the nature and future of academic libraries[J]. Journal of academic librarianship,2008, 34(1):60-66.
[54] FREEMAN G T,GEOFFREY T,BENNETT S. Library as place:rethinking roles, rethinking space. Clir publication no. 129[M]. Washington:Council on Library and Information Resources,2005:89.
[55] 吴雪芝,钟文娟,朱红. PDA(patron driven acquisitions)离国内大学图书馆还有多远?[J]. 图书馆学研究,2013(20):50-55,60.
[56] BURKEY M. Sound literature:a guide to audiobooks for youth[J]. American libraries,2013, 44(6):32-35.
[57] 姜广强. 面对y一代大学图书馆资源配置策略研究[J]. 图书馆工作与研究,2013(5):75-77.
[58] ERIKA B,NORBERT B,KRISZTINA K. E-reading-a library in your pocket[J]. Tudomanyos es muszaki tajekoztatas,2014, 61(9):331-341.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉